similar to: SAMBA and network security (Try 2 without HTML)

I have a question about setting up a samba BDC (with a samba PDC). I am running Samba as the PDC on a small network. Other Unix boxes on the network are running with: security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes password server = 192.168.1.5 So they make use of the PDC for smbmount and smbsh applications. The W2K box also uses Samba at the PDC. I want to set up a Redhat

Redhat Linux will install and configure Samba Currently 2.2.1a. The pieces are not placed in /usr/local/samba/... Does anyone have the configure parameters that would allow a "make install" of Samba 2.2.2 to put everything in the right place? I could not find this in the archives. Also, it appears smbsh is still broke in Samba 2.2.1 for Redhat 7.2. Is this known to be the case?

> > Hi, > > I'm runnig a red hat 8 with a samba 2.2.5 and my client computer is = > configured in our network with dhcp. But the problem is I can see my = > computer from a NT4 system with sp6 and from a win 2k I can not see him. = > I put in the smb.conf file encrypted passwords =3D yes. > > What else should I do? > > Thank you! > > Cristi S >

share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)

share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)

I am running wine 20050725. I used winetools to get an assortment of software loaded and with a bit of tweeking it worked. I then ran the install CD for Broderbund "The Print Shop". It loaded OK and after copying a few dll's from my windows box, it came up and ran. My problem is with printing. After reading through the users guide on printing and poking around in the archives

apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC. So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be trying to track the failure in that code? In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows: libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000) libc.so.6 =>

I see that smbmount is for Linux only. I have a need for a Solaris 8 Sun to see a Win2k shared volume, currently as read-only. So I have a few questions: - Is there a read-only capability of smbmount for Solaris 8? - Is there a Solaris 8 version of smbmount in development? Is so, when would it be released? - Can you name any commercial packages that offer the ability to mount NTFS file

Hi all Just a query from a fellow tech who's playing with Samba. He just asked me the following question, it's something I've never really thought of, but on the face of it could be worth further investigation. Any thoughts?? TIA <snip> Was doing some research last night on high availablilty - led me to a thought which I have seen around before but decided it was not

cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path:

and that access to the client should be denied. > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client? > > > > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by

> Hello Bob, > looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look > how it goes. > Sincerely > AndyBe Hello AndyBe, I download the ISO's and started the reinstall. It went through all the normal setup up to outputting the message that it was starting Anaconda. Then the screen went blank and stayed that way. This is the same symptom as when it

I was also successful with 7 computers, however they run version 6.7. For some reason this one computer upgraded to 6.8 and Xorg does not work. I also changed to 3 different terminals and it did not help. I am not giving up yet. Thanks Shoshana On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Styma, Robert (Nokia - US/Phoenix) < robert.styma at nokia.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for responding. I

Thanks for responding. I really don't know why I have the problem my computer is a Dell computer with the standard parts. I am not sure that your fix will work for me. I am using the computer remotely and am still looking for a solution. Thanks Shoshana On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Styma, Robert (Nokia - US/Phoenix) < robert.styma at nokia.com> wrote: > > I updated to Centos

have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does

Styma, Robert (Nokia - US) wrote: >> >>> looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look >>> how it goes. >> I download the ISO's and started the reinstall. It went through all >> the normal setup up to outputting the message that it was starting >> Anaconda. Then the screen went blank and stayed that way. This is

Hello Bob, looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look how it goes. Sincerely AndyBe Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2017, 17:40 +0000 schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia - US): > I am loading a server from the CentOS 6.7 ISO and then upgrading. After loading at release 6.7, the machine behaves normally. After running yum update, the X server will not start. Attempts to

Hello Bob, while im test something with samba, install an old centos 6.4 and updated it. before i move the virual machine into trash, here are the rebuilt driver without any modification. http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/6/ The prelink problem should be gone - hopefully. Sincerely AndyBe Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2017, 17:40 +0000 schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia - US): > I am loading a server

I am also using CentOS, but to get a bug fixed, you have to go upstream to RedHat. I think John Pierce is right, I had to change my run level to get the alternate consoles to work. I still have the machine at run level 3 hoping that a bug fix lets me go back to run level 5. Other machines work fine, just the 2 with the MACH64 video on the motherboard will no longer run X. Bob S.

I did try other console and it did not work. I did go from 6.7 to 6.8 but with centos not redhat. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Styma, Robert (Nokia - US) < robert.styma at nokia.com> wrote: > Try another console like ALT-F2. See if you have a black screen login > prompt. I opened a bug with RedHat for a system that when I went from 6.7 > to 6.8 booted but would not start