Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "short read while checking ext3 journal"
2001 Dec 11
1
More external journal woes.
I have been playing with external journals some more and thought I
should share some experiences.
I am running 2.4.16 with the ext3 patches from Andrew Morton
and e2fsprogs 1.25
I have an ext3fs filesystem on an 8 drive RAID5 array and place the
journal on a partition of the mirrored pair that I boot off (all
drives SCSI).
I have tried pulling the power cable and seeing what happens. I
finally
2002 Aug 20
5
unmountable ext3 root recovery
After a (hardware) crash yesterday, I was unable to boot up due to
unrecoverable ide errors (according to the printk()s) when accessing
the root filesystem's journal for recovery.
Unable to recover, I tried deleting the has_journal option, but that was
disallowed given that the needs_recovery flag was set. I saw no way
to unset that flag.
Unable to access the backups (they were on a fw
2003 Aug 18
2
another seriously corrupt ext3 -- pesky journal
Hi Ted and all,
I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have
to describe my problem in some detail.
The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box
running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB
IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms
are very similar to what Eddy described
2002 Dec 04
1
ext3-Partition lost after crash !?
Hi,
hoping that someone on this list can help me here is the Problem.
After a crash it seems the journal could not be recovered.
This is what mount gives:
root@wuehlkiste:# mount -t ext3 /dev/hdb2 /mnt
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdb2,
or too many mounted file systems
and this is the corresponding logfile-entry:
Nov 27 11:16:13 wuehlkiste kernel: attempt to
2013 Jun 25
2
removing external journal
Hi,
I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other
device (an SSD).
Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o.
I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because
needs_check is set. I can't run fsck because the journal is not
reachable. Is there any way to solve this? I understand I lost any
pending changes in the journal.
regards
2013 Jun 26
0
Re: removing external journal
On 6/25/13 3:13 AM, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other
> device (an SSD).
> Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o.
> I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because
> needs_check is set.
What does it actually say? there is no needs_check flag AFAIK.
> I
2013 Jun 26
2
Re: removing external journal
On 2013-06-26, at 9:38 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 6/25/13 3:13 AM, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
>>
>> I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other
>> device (an SSD).
>> Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o.
>> I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because
>> needs_check is set.
>
2006 Jan 26
1
Ext3 filesystem access after downgrade from v4.2 to v3.6 [SOLVED]
Peter Kjellstr?m wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 16:46, Plant, Dean wrote:
>> I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to
>> performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape
>> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3
>> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos
>> complains on
2013 Jun 27
2
Re: removing external journal
On 6/27/13 3:57 AM, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Eric, Andreas,
>
>>>> I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other
>>>> device (an SSD).
>>>> Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o.
>>>> I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because
>>>> needs_check is set.
2005 Oct 19
1
EXT3 journalling issue
Hello,
I have 2 boxes with 1.5TB storage with ext3 fs, and the kernel is 2.6.11.8.
I'm using E2fsprogs 1.37 for FS creation. And, Filesystem revision #: 1
(dynamic)
There are 2 scenarios:
1. All SATA drives, RAID5
2. All PATA drives, RAID5 and wrapped in log volumes.
I'm having lots of issues with fsck. I did search, but somehow not getting
the right information.
needs_recovery
2004 Sep 24
2
Corrupted journal
Hi
I was running few tests on the Ext3 filesystem having
an external journal; basically trying to check
recovery in crash scenarios.
I started with simple scripts doing some filesystem
operations on the ext3 partition and crashed the
system with a direct poweroff. On reboot, I also
corrupted the journal device by "dd"ing it out with
blocks of zeroes.
Now, when I try to mount the
2013 Jun 27
0
Re: removing external journal
>>>>> I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other
>>>>> device (an SSD).
>>>>> Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o.
>>>>> I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because
>>>>> needs_check is set.
>>>>
>>>> What does it actually
2013 Jun 27
0
Re: removing external journal
Eric, Andreas,
>>> I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other
>>> device (an SSD).
>>> Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o.
>>> I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because
>>> needs_check is set.
>>
>> What does it actually say? there is no needs_check flag
2002 May 13
5
Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:609:
Hi all (and developers in particular)
I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the
subject, and ends with:
"!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)"
Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year,
but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed.
I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the
2005 Nov 08
1
EXT3-fs error (device md2): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal...
Hi,
I'm running a production server (Debian Sarge install) whose root
filesystem (a software raid 1 array of 2 partitions of IDE drive)
exhibited the following problem:
Oct 28 06:00:06 server2 kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
Oct 28 06:00:06 server2 kernel: md2: rw=1, want=3050401328, limit=16353920
[...] a few of the above line snipped, want is different each time
Oct 28
2006 Jul 26
4
data recovering in EXT3
Hello,
We have run and stopped by chance command "fsck -y" on one of our raid disks
(with ext3 file system). After that we have found that SOME files disappeared
(they are not seen in the directories where they have been before).
The data are extremely important and contain a lot of programs,
scripts for some data analysis and very hard to recover by hands.
I have run ''fsck
2001 Dec 27
2
Visible /.journal
Hello
On root Partition is .journal visible . On all other
Partitions is invisible. At which way I can move it manually to a
hiden inode?
I have delete with
chattr -i /.journal
rm -f /.journal
and installed ext3 with
tune2fs -j /dev/hdb1
And /.journal is again visible!
--
MfG / With best Regards
Rusmir Duško
Registered Linux user: #130654 http://counter.li.org
2003 Sep 04
1
ext3 + external journal -- Howto..
I am new to ext3 + external journal. Is there any howto I can look at?
this is what I understand
1. mke2fs -O journal_dev /dev/md5
2. mke2fs -J device=/dev/md5 /dev/md0
3. mount /dev/md0 / -t ext3 ( hmm.. what do I need to put on fstab?? )
/dev/md5 is a two drive RAID 1 partition
/dev/md0 is a 4 drive RAID 5 partition.
questions:
1. I am running RedHat 9.0. what extra software I need to
2001 Jun 19
2
removing visible journal.dat
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I created all my ext3 partitions a while back, so the journal.dat file is
visable. I'd like to remove them and use the new tune2fs functionality.
Can I just mount the drives as ext2, rm journal.dat, tune2fs -j /dev/hd?? and
then remount as ext3? Or am I missing something?
thanks!
- --
Douglas J. Hunley (Linux User #174778)
2009 Mar 11
5
Disk usage for small files in ext3 in CentOS 5
Hello,
I noticed something unusual today.
If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the
file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size
I'm using.
I tried this on several CentOS 5 machines, both x86_64 and i386:
$ echo test >test.txt
$ ls -l test.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 filbranden filbranden 5 Mar 11 17:24 test.txt
$ du -h test.txt
8.0K