Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Win2k terminal server and "MultipleUsersOnConnection""
2001 Nov 13
2
NT terminal server
I'm running a NT4.0 Terminal Server with 50+ peopleon it. All the users' home directories / data etc. is located on a samba server (2.2.1a) on a RedHat7.1 box.
All the users on the server are shown in samba under the same connection as they're all on the same machine... this means samba only runs one copy of smb for all these users.
Everything seems to be working / set up fine but
1999 Dec 18
1
MultipleUsersOnConnection, WTSE
There is a new regedit file in Samba 2.0.6 for Windows Terminal Server
Edition that sets a MultipleUsersOnConnection value to 1. I can't find
any documentation about this regedit in the source package or using a
search of the Samba website. In Micro$oft's knowledgebase articles
Q190162, Q233082, Q231798 and Q191370, it would appear that the value
should be set to 0 rather than 1 for the
2001 Apr 04
3
Problems Using the MultipleUsersOnConnection Registry Key in WTS NT4
Hi.
I am running SAMBA 2.0.7 on HP-UX 11.00 and HP-UX 10.20.
I have tried adding the MultipleUsersOnConnection registry key onto my
Microsoft Windows NT Server 4 Terminal Server Edition servers, running with
Service Pack 6. After I make this change in the registry and reboot my WTS
servers all my samba connections from the servers are still being made with
one process instead of being split
2000 Feb 15
0
samba 2.0.6 breaks domain validation (for me)
Hi,
Recently i moved from samba 2.0.5a to Samba 2.0.6 on 4 machines. Samba 2.0.5a ran quite smooth except for oplocking problems, so i decided to upgrade.
I compiled both releases myself and used the same ./configure options both times (but i compiled on different machines: v 2.0.5a was compiled on a HP 9000/715/50, 2.0.6 was compiled on a HP 9000/800/K360)
I used binutils 2.9.1 and gcc 2.8.1 on
1999 Dec 20
0
ERROR! Out of connection structures
Hi,
I have Samba 2.0.5a running on several HP-UX 10.20 machines. (all different
hardware and patchlevel).
On one (and only one) of the machines i see at irregular intervals the next
error: ERROR! Out of connection structures
excerpt from the smb.log:
engelber opened file desktop/Microsoft PowerPoint.lnk read=Yes write=No (numopen=7)
[1999/12/20 13:19:59, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(582)
2004 May 20
0
Problems w/ MultipleUsersOnConnection registry entry for Windows 2000 Terminal servers
I'm sending this as an FYI since we don't have all the details worked out
and this isn't a Samba problem.
We have seen problems (on the one system we tried it on) with
MultipleUsersOnConnection registry entry for Windows 2000 Terminal servers
that was mentioned in
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-April/084427.html
It may only happen with users who map through Microsoft
2002 Nov 26
1
MSVC TerminalServer Speed
Hi,
Back in 1997 the list was full of tips on making Microsoft Visual C++ Studio
(v6) use files over Samba (v2.2.2 on Solaris). Could someone please point me
to the definitive answers... (beyond speed.txt?) and their current status.
We have an added complication of having 5 developers using each NT4 box over
citrix/Terminalserver. Some days we are fine, but some days we slow to a
crawl of over a
2002 Nov 26
1
Samba & Citrix
Hello Everybody,
I hope everybody is doing well and that you can help me out as I am
approaching my wit's end. I am running a Citrix server on a Windows
2000 SP 3 server. One of my published applications on this server needs
to access samba for multiple users. So basically every user who logs on
to the Citrix server needs to have access to their home directory on our
Unix server.
2003 Sep 18
1
Use Samba on an other port than 137-139?
Hello,
I would like to ask you if its possible to run Samba on an other port than
137-139?
I tried once to edit the "/etc/services" File.
The lines:
...
netbios-ns 137/tcp
netbios-ns 137/udp
netbios-dgm 138/tcp
netbios-dgm 138/udp
netbios-ssn 139/tcp
netbios-ssn 139/udp
...
I changed it to:
...
netbios-ns 6998/tcp
netbios-ns 6998/udp
netbios-dgm 6999/tcp
netbios-dgm 6999/udp
2003 Sep 18
1
NO ACTIVE CONNECTIONS
can anyone pls help,
On my Windows server, I can view and access my Samba
Server and shares, but on my Samba Server under Server
Status, the ACTIVE CONNECTIONS shows no value even
while the "demons" are running.
Sometimes The Active Conections displays 0.0.0 for the
value of the IP address.
This is absolutely driving me nuts.
SOMEONE PLS HELP!!!!
__________________________________
2003 Sep 10
2
Help using multiple file servers
I am trying to setup samba so that I can authenticate users from a
single server, but use multiple file servers to server the home
directories and user profiles. How would I go about doing this?
Rob
2003 Sep 10
1
OT: Win2k ts - cannot start microsft outlook
This is off-topic so please let me know if it is inappropriate. I thought
i'd post here as a lot of people on the list seem to be using samba with ms
terminal server.
I have profile problem ito roaming profiles from my samba dc not loading
when you log onto w2k terminal server.
I reloaded one of the servers, installed sp4 and installed ms office 2000
using the termsrvr.mst file.
When a
2003 Oct 01
1
roaming profile, w2k and chjaracter sets - PLEASE HELP URGENTLY!
I've been running verious version of samba 2.2.x up to last night.
I now converted all my server so 3.0 with ldapsam.
All my w2k roaming profiles now refuse to load, complaining about not being
able to load various files in the profile dir containing special chars.
Things like Sendto\3>> floppy... or 3?floppy or 3||!!|floppy is displayed
where it should be 3<ascii character for
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
When I try the command
nmblookup -M TESTGROUP
querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255
name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d
My /etc/hosts file is
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
192.168.100.101 testpc
192.168.100.100 linuxserver
/etc/samba/lmhosts is
127.0.0.1 localhost
2003 Sep 23
1
Samba upgrade on dedrat linux
I'm running samba 2.2.5 on a redhat 9.0 server. I'm planning on upgrading
it to 2.2.8a tomorrow.
My questions are thus:
1) I has hassles before when doing this on another redhat box because samba
was installed with redhat's own rpm's which install in different locations.
Would it be OK to do rpm --erase for all the redhat packages (samba, common,
client, swat,
2003 Sep 15
2
Roaming Profiles not updating.
I'm finding our employees' roaming profiles are not being updated. They were initially created correctly, they copy down onto a new machine, but updates are not put back onto the server. I've also noticed that smbstatus does not show any open dat files, such as ntuser.dat. I would have assumed that these files would have been held open while the client was connected.
Employees can
2003 Sep 18
1
2.2.8a newbie path problem
Hi
I'm presently installing 2.2.8a on Mandrake 9.1
I'm a newbie to Linux as well as Samba, so it's been fun...
When I first installed Linux I installed Samba from the discs (2.2.7a), but
on reading up on the subject it became clear that I should give installing
the source a go.
My problem is this - I don't think I have rerouted all of the paths to
usr/local/samba from what
2003 May 16
4
Samba & Terminal Services / Citrix
Hello!
I have heard that there is a problem with using Samba along with Windows
Terminal Services and that it's related to session IDs with multiple users
coming from one server.
I'm in the process of moving to Windows Server 2003 using Citrix and hoping
to be able to revive our samba use.
Has anyone had any success with using samba in a Terminal Server / Citrix
environment?
Thanks
2001 Apr 16
1
Multiple connections from NT terminal server
Hi people!
Does anybody remember a key in NT terminal server's registry to enable multiple connections from NT to samba (e.g. every terminal server user's request to samba volume opens a NEW connection to the samba server)?
--
Yours truly, WBR, Paul Argentoff.
+-------------------------------------------------------
| e-mail: Paul Argentoff <argentoff@rtelekom.ru>
| homepage:
2003 Oct 15
1
e100p in Australia
I've seen this question asked before but haven't seen a definative answer.
Does the e100p work in australia? Did any one who was asking the question
before bite the bullet and get one? I can get a te410 if i really have to but
would prefer to stay with the cheaper option.
Any comments appreciated, Thanks
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: