similar to: bad inode number followed by ext3_abort and remount readonly

hello: I have been reviewin my message slog and have found the following message: Dec 19 06:27:28 server02 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,7)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 What is error 28 and should I be worried about it? Ray Turcotte

Hi folks -- My machine is a RHEL 3 with 2.4 kernel installed - with some large ext3 filesystems on drives connected internally ( >200G) Now, When this system crashed (for eg:- a CPU panic /hardware error ) - e2fsck on this filesystem seems to be taking a long time to return thereby adding to the overall downtime of this system. could there be any workarounds for my issue? say for

Hi, I've run many time e2fsck, but in a special dir ls tells me: ls: r?cksendung-wlan.dvi: No such file or directory ls: baf?g_r?ckmeldung.latex: No such file or directory ls: finpr?f.pdf: No such file or directory $ cat finpr?f.pdf cat: finpr?f.pdf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden I don't know what to do? How can I find the failure? If I cat the files with debugfs, I see the

I want to config one 50T OST stroage, is it okay? Since I know that the limitation of ext3 is 1XT. Thnaks

Recently I've encountered a problem, and now I would preciate any help about being able to undelete files. My /var filestructured is mounted at /dev/hdc1 Part of my /etc/mtab looks like this: /dev/hdc1 /var ext3 rw 0 0 I'm using the e2fsprogs-1.23-2 package currently installed with Redhat 7.2 So, could anyone give me a hint of how things could be done to find deleted inodes? I've

Hi, I have 2 identical xSeries 346 with 2 identical IBM 72GB scsi drive. What i did is install the centos 4.2 serverCD on the first IBM and set the HDD to raid1 and raid0 for swap. Now what i did is get the 2nd HDD in the 1st Server swap it with the 1st HDD in the 2nd Server and rebuild the Raids. The 1st server rebuild the array fine. My problem is the Second server, after rebuilding it and

Hi, I have high IO-Wait on the ods (ceph), the osd are running a v3.1-rc9 kernel. I also experience high IO-rates, around 500IO/s reported via iostat. Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.80 0.00 62.40 18.35 0.04 5.29 0.00 5.29 5.29 3.60 sdb

Hello, I wrote earlier today about a new PRI installation in the Caribbean, where all outbound calls are functioning fine *except* calls to Sprint phone numbers, which get rejected immediately as "busy". The telco has been working with their switch manufacturer and took the output of "pri show span 1" from me and came back with this: ----quote--- Please check your timers

Hi all, I have another problem with starting domainU (xenolinux). I took me pretty much quite some time and i can not figure out why starting a new domain is failing. I will really appreciate if somebody can help me with this error. The error I get when booting xen-domainU is: /======================= Red Hat nash version 4.1.18 starting Mounted /proc filesystem Mounting sysfs Creating /dev

Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 16:46, Plant, Dean wrote: >> I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to >> performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on

Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch. Have all the domu file systems in lvm. Problem 1 If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error: Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying device XFS mounting filesystem sda5 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5 If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away. If I mount under

Hi All, I am having an issue with an XFS filesystem shutting down under high load with very many small files. Basically, I have around 3.5 - 4 million files on this filesystem. New files are being written to the FS all the time, until I get to 9-11 mln small files (35k on average). at some point I get the following in dmesg: [2870477.695512] Filesystem "sda5": XFS internal error

Hi, Now with the new libguestfs-1.27.55-1.1 I have this new issue : libguestfs: trace: is_file = 0 libguestfs: trace: is_file "/freedos/freedos.ico" libguestfs: trace: is_file = 0 libguestfs: trace: is_file "/boot/loader.rc" libguestfs: trace: is_file = 0 libguestfs: trace: umount_all libguestfs: trace: umount_all = 0 libguestfs: trace: vfs_type "/dev/sda2"

Hi, I''m starting to play with btrfs on my new computer. I''m running Gentoo and have compiled the 2.6.31 kernel, enabling btrfs. Now I have 2 partitions (on 2 different sata disks) that are free for me to play with, each about 375 gb in size. I wanted to create a "raid1" volume using these two partitions, so I did: # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdb5 # mount

Hi, guys. I''m trying to use physical disks as virtual disks in HVM domains. But I couldn''t. I''m using cs10508 of xen-unstable.hg. When I use disk = [ ''phy:sda5,ioemu:hda,w'' ] in conf file, creating HVM domain says, I need to use ''file'' modifier if I use ''ioemu''. So, I changed it to disk = [

Hi A box was installed with the majority of the free space in /home but i actually want this to be available to /opt. My fstab had /home looking like this LABEL=/home /home ext3 defaults 1 2 I umounted /home and changed the fstab to look like this /dev/sda5 /opt ext3 defaults 1 2 and then mounted /opt. All works

hi, for some reason i can not get vista ultimate to install. i get to the page where i enter the user name and password and at the next reboot, it just gets stuck in the boot loader - see attachment. the cpu usage goes to 50% and that was it. has anyone else experienced this ? it does boot a couple of times, but i guess that it is from the installation image. created domU using the virtual

For future filesystem compatibility, we are wondering if there are any Lustre MDT filesystems in existence that have 2B or more total inodes? This is fairly unlikely, because it would require an MDT filesystem that is > 8TB in size (which isn''t even supported yet) and/or has been formatted with specific options to increase the total number of inodes. This can be checked with

For future filesystem compatibility, we are wondering if there are any Lustre MDT filesystems in existence that have 2B or more total inodes? This is fairly unlikely, because it would require an MDT filesystem that is > 8TB in size (which isn''t even supported yet) and/or has been formatted with specific options to increase the total number of inodes. This can be checked with

Roland, On 2020-09-10 21:27, Roland wrote: >> with rsync hanging - after breakout on /home for writing I then get: >> "Read-only file system" > > if your filesystem switches to read-only, you have a serious problem > with your system/storage, not with rsync. > > rsync (or the workload) is simply triggering the problem. Thanks for the response . . Hmm . .