Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "passwd : Module is unknown (Redhat 9 Enterprise Edition)"
2005 Aug 11
2
URGENT: How to recover ext3 files?
Hi,
After panic boot, I have executed fsck for the mount point and we
couldn't find a single file. We have lot of directories under lost+found
like this #3194985.
Can anyone tell me how to recover the data from this folder? This is
urgent.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards
Kapil Sampath
"Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they
2005 Apr 24
3
Help needed to recover data from ext3 file system where mkfs was issued accidentally
Hi,
I connected my harddisk which had ext3 filesystem and some files
archived in it as slave device and issued "mkfs /dev/hdb2" accidentally.
Immediately I issued Ctrl C and stopped the process. But before that it
had deleted some 100 Blocks.
After that I am unable to boot that hard disk as primary device. The
system is asking me "please insert a valid boot device and press
2005 Jun 16
2
User directories in /home are missing
Hi,
I use Redhat Enterprise Edition 2.4.21 kernel version. In my system all
the user directories in /home disappeared. No one deleted it. But I
don't know how it is missing. I had one or two open sessions where I
already logged in as root and cd'ed to one particular home directory.
>From there I am able to access files in that home directory. But not
from a new session. In new session
2005 Jun 17
1
[Q] Is this true and does it mean there is dynamic defragmentation in ext2/3?
Someone recently posted the following statement midway down the page
at
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-305871-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-ext3+ordered+data-start-25.html
>You don't need to defragment ext2/ext3 because as you use the
>filesystem file blocks and inodes are moved around and reallocated
>to keep the data nearly contiguous. It's not perfect, but it
2005 Jul 08
1
filesystem fragmentation stats?
Let me preface this by saying "Yes, I know *nix filesystems don't need
to worry about fragmentation".
That said, is there a way to check the overall level of fragmentation of
a live ext3 filesystem? I know about filefrag, but that's for specific
files. And I think e2fsck tells you, but only if you take the
filesystem offline for the scan. Is there anything that will give
2005 May 19
3
[Q] Where does all the space go?
I created a filesystem as follows:
mke2fs -j -O dir_index -O sparse_super -T largefile /dev/drbd/6
Here's the the output from df
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use%
/dev/drbd/6 475G 33M 452G 1%
It seems that ext3 has taken 23 GB, which is about 5% of the total
disk size, for itself. Is that right?
If that is, indeed, the case, why does df just list 33M as being
2005 May 22
4
FSCK of corrupted ext3 filesystem
Hello,
I have a 1.3TB ext3 filesystem that has been in service for about 3 months.
About 6 days ago the Emulex fibrechannel controller logged a SCSI error
and the filesystem changed to RO.
It appears that the filesystem instantly changes to RO and prevents the
journal from working, therefore invalidating the filesystem.
The filesystem was unmounted and a remount was attempted. The mount
failed
2006 Apr 17
1
EXT3-fs unexpected failure msg ?
Hi -
We have had a raid failure, we have some what recovered
but we continue to see the following ext3 message...
Apr 17 14:59:14 acnlin84 kernel: EXT3-fs unexpected failure: (((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL <<
BH_Uptodate)) != 0);
Apr 17 14:59:14 acnlin84 kernel: Possible IO failure.
Since we have experienced several instances of ext3 file system corruption
when we lose
2006 Feb 28
2
Status of fragment support, advantages of having fewer indoes
Hi,
There wasn't much information regarding fragment support of ext2/3 since 2003
[1], Andreas stating that there were problems with the xattr implementation. Has
this changed in the meanwhile?
My second question is regarding the bytes-per-inode ratio: What benefits would I
gain from having fewer inodes? I reckon it's only diskspace (if so, how much?).
best regards,
Michael Renner
[1]
2006 May 10
2
Why different directory sizes?
I just discovered two directories with the same number of files and the same
number of hard links but different size:
# stat /home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn \
/hdsync/home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn
File: `/home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn'
Size: 8192 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 801h/2049d Inode: 52060
2006 Oct 03
1
16TB ext3 mainstream - when?
Are we likely to see patches to allow 16TB ext3 in the mainstream
kernel any time soon?
I am working with a storage box that has 16x750GB drives RAID5-ed together
to create a potential 10.5TB of potential storage. But because ext3 is
limited to
8TB I am forced to split into 2 smaller ext3 filesystems which is really
cumbersome
for my app.
Any ideas anybody?
2008 Oct 08
1
[LLVMdev] Error while making new pass
HI Devang,
Initially I had not added this pass to the group and I got this error
regarding PassManager. I added the pass to group just to check whether that
removes the error or not...
I have removed it again.
Is there any other registration required to configure pass manager for the
pass?
--Kapil
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On
2008 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Error while making new pass
On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:59 AM, kapil anand wrote:
> Hi Devang,
>
> GlobalModRefPass is also a ModulePass and it uses CallGraph Analysis.
> So, I think it should not necessary to extend CallGraphSCCPass to use
> CallGraph information. Module Pass shoule be sufficient...
ok, but you're Registering your pass in CallGraph Analysis group.
What if you remove
2005 Nov 03
5
mount r/w and r/o
I have an ext3 filesystem mounted r/w on 1 host and r/o on multiple
hosts. Dangerous but cost effective. I recently implemented some
protection through a fc switch that restricts some hosts to r/o access
to the data luns. So if someone types mount -o rw or something, all is
not lost.
The issue occurs when it's mounted r/w on 1 host and another host
attempts to mount it r/o. The mount
2009 Sep 25
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Development on ARM
Hi,
I am trying to natively compile LLVM on a ARM virtual machine ( which I am
running through QEMU) but getting the error as mentioned in previous mail.
VM is running ARM926 which according to ARM architecture, has vfp support.
Do some changes need to me made in LLVM distribution to make it run on ARM
platforms
Thanks
--Kapil
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Xerxes RĂ„nby <xerxes at
2006 Apr 06
2
deleting partition does not effect superblock?
Hi,
I am using kernel 2.6.15.4.
On my system, I first created a partition with EXT3 and put some data
on it. Later, I deleted the partition, and re-created another
partition with the same starting block number and a higher ending
block number. I intended to format it with another filesystem, but
surprisingly (or maybe just to me), the superblock of the partition
had not changed. I could still
2009 Sep 25
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM Development on ARM
Hi Kapil!
LLVM both builds and runs fine on ARM Linux.
I am running a public buildbot for the llvm project that are compiling
and testing llvm on arm-linux daily and this machine are running Ubuntu
Jaunty.
http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux
I have successfully compiled LLVM on ARM using GCC 4.3.3 on a Ubuntu
Jaunty system and GCC 4.4 on a Ubuntu Karmic system.
Do you use
2008 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] Error while making new pass
Hi Devang,
GlobalModRefPass is also a ModulePass and it uses CallGraph Analysis.
So, I think it should not necessary to extend CallGraphSCCPass to use
CallGraph information. Module Pass shoule be sufficient...
--Kapil
On 10/8/08, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Kapil,
>
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:19 AM, kapil anand wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I
2005 Oct 31
3
1.5TB ext3 partitions - mke2fs problems at 2^31 blocks
I am trying to get a 9550SX to support a 1.5TB raid partition. I am unsure
whether this is a driver problem, or an ext3 problem (as am getting some
other wierdness detecting LUNs), but...
fdisk recognizes the disk OK. I make a single extended partition with a
single 1.5TB logical partition inside it. I then run
mke2fs -j /dev/sdb
It gets to writing inode tables, and wants to write 11176 block
2010 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Static Profiling Algorithms in LLVM
Hello Jeff,
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Jeff Kunkel <jdkunk3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> My god! I would love a branch predictor! It would simplify many aspects of
> my register allocator.
The branch predictor of the implementation is not as accurate as the
one from the paper, but it is close enough. Unfortunately, the branch
predictor is a very expensive pass, because it relies on