similar to: Permission problem in message command with guest ftp user

are being offered by the server. You can check also what shares are being offered by the windows boxes the same way. I wonder why the other windows machines are not showing up in network neighborhood? Try sharing some things between windows machines. Maybe you have something misconfigured on the windows side. There is a script, findsmb, which comes with samba. First turn off nmbd (killall nmbd) ,

for this process is "root", that is correct. The PID 7247 is one of the users, but the UID shouldn't be "root" and should be the username that was authenticated during logon. Anyone have same or similar problem? and how do I prevent this problem from happening again? I would appreciate any help. Thanks. Will Sun wsun@jpl.nasa.gov (818) 354-2311 Return-Path:

<<<<<<<<<<<<< I connect my homedir from the testserver and start Lotus Notes. Lotus Notes is infamous for it's sensitivity for 'non-optimal' network connections. Notes tries to lock certain files and complains immediately if that fails. > 3. does the log message always fail at the same offset/count: > (fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset

read list (S) This is a list of users that are given read-only access to a service. If the connecting user is in this list then they will not be given write access, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no matter what the writeable option is set to. The

network. I did read somewhere on the web (several years ago) of a guy who managed to boot windows from the net. With the start of Win 98/ME/ etc.etc it's not posible anymore. I currently use PXE to install machine from the net using bpbatch that works great only bpbatch is not really under developnt and the script language is a bit buggy. I see only one option to boot windows from the net and

I can access Samba and Windows share on my newtork (I have Samba on linux server) and some W2K Server. >From my SUSE 9 Professional client within Konqueror I can create, delete file, rename and even overwrite files on the share of my server (Samba or Windows). But When I open the file (file.txt or any other type) within Konqueror on a Samba share (by example right clicking and choosing open

Japanese input - the final frontier. This is the last obstacle before I can work completely within Centos and be free of Windows. But it's still not working. To cut to the chase, in my quest to get Japanese working, I came across the following: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-i18n-list/2004-November/msg00030.html ... where someone says: "You need to have httx (htt_xbe) running

TEST 3 If you get a "connection refused" response then the smbd server may not be running. If you installed it in inetd.conf then you probably edited that file incorrectly. If you installed it as a daemon then check that it is running, and check that the netbios-ssn port is in a LISTEN state using "netstat -a". Note: You have xinetd not inetd on the redhat box. To avoid all

Hello! I noticed that the binaries of all llvm tools contain an rpath to $OBJDIR/Release/bin. I just only learned about rpaths, but the way I understand them this would only make sense if that path would contain shared libraries, which it doesn't. Especially it makes no sense if I install the binaries and delete the build directory (where it potentially even leaves a security issue behind).

Well, you can run smbstatus from the preexec script. You can grep out the name of the user connecting and compare it to the %U or %u variable sent during the login to $IPC. This could get complicated. For example, your script would depend, maybe, on whether you have security = share or security = user. Here is a possibly useful tool for figuring out what you want. This smb.conf share, with the

> I've run the test last night to see how long it takes, and I can > afford to cronjob it for the night. Great! > I didn't quite realize it would automatically send the report, but > it did [1] and there are a few test failure from the > Frontend{C,C++} directories. I suppose this is because I have > llvm-gcc4.0 2.1 installed, which might need to be upgraded. Is >

Hello list! Tanya Lattner wrote: > We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you > could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now > we have virtually no testers covering this platform. I've run the test last night to see how long it takes, and I can afford to cronjob it for the night. I didn't quite realize it would automatically

When I try to run any X11 app I get the following: ----------------------------------------------- X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. kedit: Fatal IO error: client killed ----------------------------------------------- The DISPLAY variable maps to an IP address other than 127.0.0.1 and is listed int /etc/hosts. I am not a member of this list so a CC: to dgames at isoc.net

>> llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind >> that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). > > This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time llvm > is built and the test run. Shouldn't this be part of > NewNightlyTest.pl then? Yes. Patches accepted ;) There is a GSOC student that is supposed

and that access to the client should be denied. > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client? > > > > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by

Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> Is >> there a specific version of llvm-gcc that is prefered for nightly >> tests? Shall I go with the latest stable one? 4.0 or 4.2? > llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind > that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > >> llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind > >> that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). > > > > This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time llvm > > is built and the test run.

I posted a question a few days back to see if anyone could tell me where the default X0.hosts file should/does reside. Searching the system turns up nothing, and did not find any info in any of the man pages, other than it would reside in /etc, but doesn't. Setting a host access permission does not become permanent, and I'd really like to find out where the thing should be so I can

Good day to all. I don''t like to Post unless I am really stuck. Guess what? Redhat with Shorewall. Been using this for years. I have a new client that we have setup with Redhat and Shorewall. The problem is that his outside address (ETH0 = NET) is dynamic (i.e. DHCP enabled). All the rules work fine when we use a STATIC address on Eth0, so we know the rules, filters, tos etc work fine

>>>> llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind >>>> that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). >>> >>> This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time llvm >>> is built and the test run. Shouldn't this be part of >>> NewNightlyTest.pl then? >> >>