similar to: File Locking - File Opened Read-Only Locks File for Read-Write Access

IN SHORT: - READ+WRITE becomes READ ONLY - OWNER ACL Permissions for "another User" affects Group ACL Permissions Hi Experts, we recently figured some strange behaviour on our Debian 5 (Lenny, uname 2.6.26-2-686) + Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny14 server that i would like to discuss here. I cannot tell apart if its a bug or just lack of understanding. Here is the Scenario: I got a samba

Hi Arnaud, The patch looks good. I've committed it in r133249. > > > I noticed an unexpected --- to me at least --- behaviour of the allocator. > > I have some instructions using 2 pairs of registers, say “mpra R_x, R_x+1, > R_y, R_y+1”, and setting the pairing constraints R_x -> R_x+1 and R_y -> > R_y+1 could silently produce wrong code like “mpra %R0, %R2, %R1,

I need help interpeting this issue, thanks in advance. A file was created by user nli on windows 7, that user can manipulate the file at will. If user jpyeron tries to manipulate the file on XPx64 the below happens. # smbd -V Version 3.0.33-3.40.el5_10 [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(188) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8]

Hi Lang, > Hmm. Let me make sure I'm reading this right. The constraints are that: > a) All four operands have distinct registers. > b) The first two are in a consecutive pair (second > first) > c) The second two are in a consecutive pair (fourth > third) Constraints b & c are OK, but a is too strict : "mpra %R0, %R1, %R0, %R1" is OK. But I though, may be

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:14:58 -0300 francis picabia via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On production, we have Samba share on Solaris and ADS config > working already using 3.6.25 > > On a dev box used to test patches, I've spent a day and > some time on a Oracle support ticket trying to get > this working again under 4.4.14 > > The same problem

Everyone, I have finally resolved the new heartburn 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty was giving me and have stumbled upon some information that might help others out there. I was seeing problems with ACL entries getting mangled and disappearing, Excel making files read only and extended attributes doing bizarre things. The solution revolved around what appears to be a change in how ACLs are managed.

Hi, We've just put in a Samba fileserver to replace our windows box for our School District and it seems to be working great. I have a question about defining some specific permissions though. We set up 'Drop boxes' for teachers that kids can drag files into, but they don't have read permission so they can't read each others submitted work. Here's what is looks like on

Solaris ACLs - Files Becoming Read Only --------------------------------------- Problem: -------- Since we have upgraded to Microsoft Office 2003 from Microsoft Office 2000 we have had problems with files becoming Read Only. Background: ----------- We have read-only and write groups which have access to files. We control access using both the Samba configuration file and file system ACLs.

Hi ML, I got this problem on my linux box SMB3 PDC with ACLs(xfs filesystem) Samba 3.0.20 look: I encounter a problem with ONLY msword 97-2000 files ( yes, I hate this product, but for now I have not the choice of changing it in my case!): creating a new word file test.doc is ok --> user have good permissions : rwx modifing and saving this document result in changing permissions to my

Attached is a small patch to allow users of the PBQP allocator to optionally insert a custom pass. I believe it can be usefull to other users of the pbqp. I used it to undo some of the coalescer work, and make sure that I have different virtual registers, inserting a copy if necessary, to build a pair. I noticed an unexpected --- to me at least --- behaviour of the allocator. I have some

Samba 3.0.11 + acl (ext3) ------------------------- I have to second this, but actually we are seeing the same problem with Linux ACLS (ext3) and Office 97. Further investigation showed that although the acls seem to be inherited (eg the group has write access) the do not seem to be honoured with regard to the user. Let me give an example to clarify: 2 users: y,x belogn to group: mygroup

On production, we have Samba share on Solaris and ADS config working already using 3.6.25 On a dev box used to test patches, I've spent a day and some time on a Oracle support ticket trying to get this working again under 4.4.14 The same problem happens whether I'm testing with homes or a share with /tmp. The user isn't matching expectations, so it won't allow copying a 700 file

I have an issue with W2K/XP using Folder Redirection to a Samba homes share (or any share for that matter). This is only a problem when access for a user is via an ACE (ACL) and not the traditional file system permissions. So for example (user is cath in this example): [root@gandalf users]# ll -d cath drwxrwx---+ 5 root root 4096 Apr 15 20:40 cath [root@gandalf users]# getfacl cath # file: cath

Hai Nico, Did your stop samba and start samba already. I have on one old server, also debian wheezy samba 3.6.6 about the same problem, stopping samba and starting solves it. !! restarting samba not !! Give it a try. If that does not work, try the following. Disconnect all you netwerk shares on the computer and reconnect them. I have 1 pc here (win7 64bit) which is getting a

Hi all, I've got these permissions set on a folder: $ getfacl htdocs # file: htdocs # owner: root # group: users user::rwx group::rwx group:DOMAIN\134htdocs_access:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x The idea being that any users in the "htdocs_access" group in Active Directory will have full access to this "htdocs" folder, without interfering with the real owner/group of the

When using the following to keep duplicate files on multiple computers, I find some files have their ACLs changed and cannot then be opened. I am using the following command. My goal is to be able to read/write/edit any local or remote file from any machine. Until recently this worked just fine, but now some files cannot be opened once rsync'd. rsync -avzh --progress --delete --super -A

I have a storage server running samba 3.6.6 on Debian. Unfortunately I cannot easily upgrade samba as this is a production server. The server is a member of a Samba-based domain, unix users are still handled by NIS. When I logon to a Windows 7 pc (also part of the domain) with my own user my homedirectory is automatically available as H:\. I can see the content of the directory but when I try to

I'm having a problem that I've seen people talk about in the list archives. Unfortunately I haven't found any solutions that work. It is a documented bug and I've added my story to it. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2346 I'm posting my problem here as well because it is causing me some serious grief. For the past few months I have been working towards

I tried the following: * rebooted both Samba DC's -- no change * restarted samba on storage server -- no change * remove client pc from domain, tried accessing the folder from non-domain pc -- no change * created a temporary server (running samba 4.x) to serve the same homedirectores -- no problem at all So that narrows the problem down to something on the storage server. I'll try

Have you tried smbmount //w2kname/share /mountpoint -o username=user,password=pass,workgroup=domain ? Alexandre Moutinho -----Original Message----- From: Andy Tomlin [mailto:atomlin@sandisk.com] Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Junho de 2002 17:52 To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: [Samba] RE: Unable to Access W2K share as read/write using SMBMOUNT I am still unable to get this working -