similar to: Making a NAS/HFS server

I am running a CentOS 3 server with a kernel version -2.4.21-40. I typically use Webmin to accomplish mounting varied filesystems, but this one has me buffaloed. We have a Thecus N5400 that was mounted on a Mac and a ton of data was written to it. All of the data was placed in yearly folders with content-related folders below the yearly folders. When I mount this through Webmin as an smbfs

Hi A friend has a disk with an hfs filesystem on it; we'd like to move it to a Debian (etch 2.6.18-6) box and share it via samba 3.0.24. I can mount the hfs disk and see the files on the linux box : good I can share a normal (xfs/etx3) fs via samba to the Mac : good Although I can share the hfs fs via samba, the extended attributes are not visible; so the existing files on the hfs

hi will the official rsync version in future maybe support HFS(+) filesystem, like rsyncx does right now? i ask because the rsyncx version dosen't run on my linuxbox and the feature is only supported if all systems use rsyncx. regards sam

Hi, I'm looking at using Linux as a NAS / SAN device, and would like some input from other's who have done this before? How would it compare to commercial SAN devices, Thecus N8800SAS (http://www.thecus.com/products_over.php?cid=11&pid=177&set_language=english) or something similar to these? I would probably use hardware RAID 10, and could go with either SAS / SATA, and then

Hi all, I?ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i?m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl?s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the

Hey, The recent discussion on NAS/SAN and the Thecus N8800 got me to thinking. Bit of background. I have an old Dual Athlon MP2800+ that I'm using for a home web/file server. It runs fine but between the noise of the various fans and it's location in the living room, I've been asked by my spouse to find a replacement for it that's smaller & quieter. Looking at the Thecus, and

I tried to install kmod-hfs and kmod-hfsplus but not found ? What is up ? the system is all updated with yum update. Jerry

Hi, I''m looking at using Linux as a NAS / SAN device, and would like some input from other''s who have done this before? How would it compare to commercial SAN devices, Thecus N8800SAS (http://www.thecus.com/products_over.php?cid=11&pid=177&set_language=english) or something similar to these? I would probably use hardware RAID 10, and could go with either SAS / SATA,

Hello first, sorry for my bad english but i'm french I'm using totaly Ubuntu Dapper for 4 months, and Wine 0.9.9 I would like to submit you a very usefull software for windows and who doesn't work with Wine : it's Http File Server ( or HFS for close friends :D ) The HFS developer knows that HFS doesn't work with Wine, but doesn't know why, so we need your help :D A

Hello Samba experts, I have just successfully replaced the old default Thecus Samba version 3.5.16 on my Thecus NAS (32-bit Intel Atom, 3 GB RAM, i686 Thecus kernel 2.6.33) by a current Samba 4.6.5 build that I have cross-compiled myself from scratch. Note that so far, I am using the unchanged (i.e. exactly identical) old 3.5.16 smb.conf file for 4.6.5. Everything seems to work fine in

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8333 Summary: crash with hfs-compression.diff and possible fix Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: martinjotte at

OS X 10.4.6 (BSD) I was using the 'standard' versions (i.e. non-HFS supporting) of rsync with the backup -b option so that I could do nightly incrementals. This seemed to be running fine. Changes to existing backed up files got copied to the appropriate path(s) on the target. BUDIR=myDirectoryName time /usr/local/bin/rsync -a -b --suffix=# --backup-dir=$BUDIR / Users

That doesn’t work too. :-( Last login: Mon Mar 19 19:18:16 on console iMac:~ andre$ mount /dev/disk0s2 on / (hfs, local, journaled) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse) map -hosts on /net (autofs, nosuid, automounted, nobrowse) map auto_home on /home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse) /dev/disk2 on /Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3 (hfs, local, nodev, nosuid, journaled, noowners) iMac:~ andre$

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8284 Summary: hfs-compression.diff patch incorrectly expands relative directory Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hello again, Jeremy and other Samba experts, I'm sorry to be such a pain in your neck(s), but I still need your help in looking for help trying to find out why SMB2/3.1.1 in Samba 4.6.5 performs so much worse than SMB/1.5 in Samba 3.6.15 in scenarios with a huge number of small files. As requested by Jeremy, I have done wireshark "pcapng" captures of the four scenarios as

I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its power supply, it has not skipped a beat in all this time. I use it primarily as a backup device (via NFS) for a couple of Linux machines, (via SMB) for a couple of Windows PC's, and (via ftp) for web sites at my hosting provider. SMART+ reporting shows

I have a feature request for rsync. I tried posting it to the FAQ-o-matic, but that system didn't seem to be accepting new questions. I hope this is an okay list for the request--apologies if it's misdirected. Mac OS X provides support for the Mac file system resource forks and mac specific metadata (e.g., creator and file type). Most Unix applications ignore this information, but it

I dont see anything hfsplus in the modules area??? > uname -r > > 3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64 > > [root at nuc5i3 ~]# find /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/ |grep hfs > /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs > /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/squashfs.ko >

If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or home theater system. We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but I'm in the market for something new. The NetGear's aren't the cheapest ones around but they do what it says on the box. My only real gripe with them is the

I have a Thecus NAS, which seems to be a samba server internally # smbclient -L thecus : Domain=[THECUS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.14a] My Workstation (Mandrake 10.1): # uname -r 2.6.11-6mdk # rpm -qa |grep samba samba-server-3.0.13-2mdk samba-swat-3.0.13-2mdk samba-common-3.0.13-2mdk samba-client-3.0.13-2mdk The problem: when I 'mount -t smbfs' one of the folders of the thecus and