similar to: Samba without NetBIOS

Is it possible to disable all lookup protocols and only use DNS using samba when all hosts are w2k and a samba 3 domain controller? I am only saying this on the assumption that you can disable wins, netbios, nbt when using DNS and a Microsoft AD as a domain controller. If so what should the smb.conf file look like. thanks

Hello everybody, I installed samba 3.0.1 on a solaris 8 and I don't understand the message in /var/adm/messages ... netbios-ns/udp server failing (looping) service terminated The command niscat services.org_dir returns netbios-ns netbios-ns tcp 137 netbios name service netbios-ns netbios-ns udp 137 netbois name service Any ideas Jean Frontin System team I R I T Universit?

I would like to disable NBT on my network but I also want to put SAMBA to greater use. Is there any way to do this without NBT? If not, will a future version of SAMBA be available that can? -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

When I use smbclient to access an IOMEGA NAS server, smbclient tries to access port 445 for a full five minutes before timing out: [2004/02/20 17:48:24, 10] lib/gencache.c:gencache_get(262) Returning valid cache entry: key = NBT/NAS_120_1#20, value = 192.168.123.161:0, timeout = Fri Feb 20 17:53:22 2004 [2004/02/20 17:48:24, 5] libsmb/namecache.c:namecache_fetch(201) name

I have been searching around - I cant seem to figure out if netbios browsing is supposed to work or not. # /usr/sbin/nmbd -F -S nmbd version 4.1.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 server role = 'active directory domain controller' not compatible with running nmbd standalone. You should start 'samba' instead, and it will control starting the

Hi, I want to ask you, if you release an RPM package for samba 2.2.2 for Redhat 6.2 too, and not only for version 7.1 Thanks a lot Tomas Zeman

I need to allow [read] access to a Samba server using both IP filtering & UserIDs . For a given list of IP subnets, any user should have access. Outside these 'trusted' subnets, I need to do User authentication. I can handle the User authentication OK in several ways. However, I don't see any way to do the 'short circuit' allow for some IPs, then use User authentication

Hi all, I've been looking at the samba build farm code and hope you can help with a couple questions... First, is the build_farm code usable under an open source license? Second, does the build_farm currently run any network tests between a client and server on separate machines? Thanks, Bryce

is there by any chance a smb modual for squid? Squid is a proxy/cache server used on unix systems that gives pretty complete logs, but only lists clients by IP. Is there anyway to easily tie this to a netbios name incase your administrating a windows network and want names associated with places instead of IP's that can change on a DHCP network? thanks all -Conlan Adams

Is it possible to for a Windows XP workstation to connect to samba-2.0.5a-12 version? I'm following some threads but could not get the complete way on how to do it. Is there a site or a step-by-step instruction on how to do it? Million thanks in advance!!! -- Jun Tanamal

I have two samba servers (version 2.2.2-2, debian sid) with identical configuration. One stands in the server room and is part of the server subnet. the other is in the normal 'user' subnet. I added both server (several times!) to the win2000 domain. the procedure was identical. Both have secret.tbs files of 8192 bytes opposite to the 6xx bytes which they have when they are not joined to

Hello, I'm looking for some (user & technical) feedback on a change I'm considering on how mount and smbmount works together. The current way mounts are done are: mount -t smbfs ... => smbmount ... => smbmnt Possibly without the mount step. smbmount stays as a daemon and reconnects when asked (unless it crashes). Problems: - Some mount options should affect if the mount

I have set up a web page describing my Unix to SMB password synchronisiation which also has the source code to the C front end and expect script used. http://www.btinternet.com/~p.polkinghorne/samba/u2s/ Note this is a Solaris specific solution - but should be adaptable to other Unices. Hope this helps someone ... -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell

With OpenSSH 2.9.9p2 as the server, I'm not able to do scp or "ssh machinename command" in general to any of my Suns! I tracked this down a bit; the problem occurs only when PAM support is enabled. However, if I remove line 430 of session.c, "do_pam_session(s->pw->pw_name, NULL);" inside of do_exec_no_pty, the problem goes away. It looks like the following entry

Please see my post from 24 hours ago for the background on my efforts to get Samba to run. I received instructions to modify include/includes.h to change the #include <compat.h> to #include <compat_ap.h>. Needless to say, this solved nothing other than a bunch of harmless warnings. It also caused a different warning to spew forth eternally from gcc, and more importantly, it

i have a samba PDC and a NT PDC working in mi local net.. in the samba PDC there are around 800 users.. in the NT PDC there are aroun 400 users.. i want my user to can use the shares of the NT and the shares of the clients of the NT.. in Microsoft terms this is called Trusth relationship.. how can i do this with samba? thx!

Hi Everybody, We are integrating samba,kerberos and ldap samba-3.0.2a sun kerberos sun ldap all the three servers are on three different solaris machines. we were able to successfully integrate samba and ldap and works fine. When trying to bring in kerberos support , we changed the samba configuration file as follows interfaces = 131.183.20.96 bind interfaces only

i tried in the smb.conf [global] unyx password sinc = yes pam password change = yes obey pam restrictions = yes and have compiled samba with pam support (im using redhat 7.2 and samba 2.2.2 rpm version from ftp.samba.org for redhat) if i logon in my linux box (telnet or ssh) with user xxx i have a message displayed "Warning you password expire in xx (5) days" if i put in /etc/shadow the

Running v3.0.2a-SUSE, joined to AD, all clients are XP.SP2 When smb.conf has "smb ports = 139", then %L is populated with the appropriate netbios alias name as selected by the end user, and everything works as expected. When "smb ports = 445" or is not specified, then %L is populated with the host name instead of the alias name. Is there a code patch for %L or an

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:28:57 +0000 Vincent DROUIN <vdrouin at chapsvision.com> wrote: > Thanks for the advice about the security line, I won't use domain > type anymore then. > > I know name_status_find is using NetBios, what I don't know is why > this function is called when using 'security = ads', and as a result > of the fail my domain is added to the