similar to: Doing fsck on shutdown

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Doing fsck on shutdown"

2005 Dec 23
4
Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.42 Severity: minor Tags: patch Logcheck does not report any error if the config file is not readable or does not exists. This may easily happen, as logcheck is run as logcheck user and while one is testing a new configuration on live system with running configuration intact. Following fragment may help: # Now source the config file - before things that should
2005 Mar 06
3
Bug#298291: logcheck-database: Printer out-of-paper reported
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.34 Severity: minor I have parallel port attached printer and kernel reports whenever printer is out of paper: Mar 6 12:38:50 host kernel: lp0 out of paper However, this is not a situation that should be reported by default (IMHO) by logcheck sending report email. Thus I propose adding following line to ignore.d.workstation/logcheck (possibly to .server
2005 Sep 23
2
Unmounted File Handle
Is it practical to get a R/W file handle opened against an existing file on an unmounted ext2 filesystem? -- Chuck Wolber Electronic Flight Bag Crew Information Systems/ Linux Wonk 253.576.1154 "You can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards." --Steve Jobs
2016 Sep 08
2
smbd to authenticate via pam modules
On 09/08/2016 05:10 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:59:14PM +0200, David Komanek via samba wrote: >> and there is nothing logged by pam libraries, so I suppose they are not >> called at all (other services are using it successfully and logging >> without problems). But as long as I am using plaintext passwords, it >> should be going to pam
2005 Feb 05
1
updating ALSA
Hi, I have installed CentOS 4 beta and everything works apart from the sound. Searching online I have found that Fedora Core 3 requires upgrading ALSA to the very latest version for sound to work on this laptop, that probaly means that I need to upgrade ALSA. Is there anytwhere I can get updates RPMs/SRPMs or do I have to compile the updates? AFAIK alsa is now part of the kernel, will this cause
2011 Oct 28
2
Split an array into arbirtary sizes
Hi there, I have a ts object that I would like wo split into arbirary sizes. Can'tfind how to do this? I realise its probaly very simple buy I can't sem to find the right function? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Split-an-array-into-arbirtary-sizes-tp3948938p3948938.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2013 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > On 10/9/2013 4:19 PM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > >> On 10/9/2013 3:09 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: >> >>> On Oct 9, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We have a whole bunch of readers(we would have
2001 Apr 06
5
workgroup
tengo una pregunta : si tengo una red y dentro de esta hay 10 grupos de trabajo, pero en mi servidor samba solo acepta que especifique un solo grupo de trabajo, ?hay alguna manera de que el servidor samba se vea en dos grupos distintos????? _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Construye tu p?gina personal en Yahoo! GeoCities. ?Es f?cil, r?pido y gratis!
2004 Dec 24
2
[LLVMdev]Undefinedreferenceto`llvm::sys::CopyFile(llvm::sys::Path const&,llvm::sys::P
Hi Reid, Looking closer at the build process, I find that Path.cpp doesn't get compiled, even if it is a newer version than its *.o file. That's probaly the reason the error still exists. I've zipped and attached the trace after the point the new Path.cpp was updated by cvs. It clearly shows that it newer gets compiled and now shows that it is the dependencies in the makefile
2013 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers
On 10/9/2013 11:19 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > > Isnt having a YAML file starting with the below better, so that you dont > need to go through file extensions. > > magic : > arch: > > I guess we will use a fixed file extension anyway (we probaly don't want to > use .txt for YAML object file for example), so what do you think is the > benefit of depending on special
2013 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > On 10/9/2013 11:19 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > >> >> Isnt having a YAML file starting with the below better, so that you dont >> need to go through file extensions. >> >> magic : >> arch: >> >> I guess we will use a fixed file extension anyway (we probaly
2019 Dec 10
1
Re: [PATCH] rhv-upload: Fix waiting for transfer
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 10:58 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:34:18PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > > We were not considering failures while initializing the transfer. In > > this case the transfer phase can change to PAUSED_SYSTEM or > > FINISHED_FAILURE, and transfer_url will be None, which failed the > > upload
2005 Jun 17
1
[Q] Is this true and does it mean there is dynamic defragmentation in ext2/3?
Someone recently posted the following statement midway down the page at http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-305871-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-ext3+ordered+data-start-25.html >You don't need to defragment ext2/ext3 because as you use the >filesystem file blocks and inodes are moved around and reallocated >to keep the data nearly contiguous. It's not perfect, but it
2006 Mar 23
11
linux box as vlan p2p limiter and firewall?
re I would like to do some firewalling and p2p shaping/limiting on one of the vlans in my network and I was thinking of using linux box as transparent bridged firewall/limiter. For this I''m planning to use AMD64 2.2Ghz box with 2 1gbit NIC (Broadcom 5721), that will be bridged. The box must be totally transparent and unseen in the network, as well as it should have much influence on
2005 Oct 10
1
how to run fsck on 500GB ext3 partition
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20051010/1f0b0bc2/attachment.htm>
2019 Nov 28
3
[PATCH] rhv-upload: Fix waiting for transfer
We were not considering failures while initializing the transfer. In this case the transfer phase can change to PAUSED_SYSTEM or FINISHED_FAILURE, and transfer_url will be None, which failed the upload with a misleading error: RuntimeError: direct upload to host not supported, requires ovirt-engine >= 4.2 and only works when virt-v2v is run within the oVirt/RHV environment, eg. on
2013 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers
# is a line comment chracter in YAML so it's valid. That's why I wrote a simple magic "comment". On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > On 10/10/2013 5:00 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Shankar Easwaran >> <shankare at codeaurora.org>**wrote: >> >> On
2013 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers
On 10/10/2013 5:00 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Shankar Easwaran > <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > >> On 10/9/2013 11:19 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: >> >>> Isnt having a YAML file starting with the below better, so that you dont >>> need to go through file extensions. >>> >>> magic : >>> arch:
2004 Dec 24
0
[LLVMdev]Undefinedreferenceto`llvm::sys::CopyFile(llvm::sys::Pathconst&, llvm::sys::P
Hi Reid, Looking closer at the build process, I find that Path.cpp doesn't get compiled, even if it is a newer version than its *.o file. That's probaly the reason the error still exists. I've zipped and attached the trace after the point the new Path.cpp was updated by cvs. It clearly shows that it newer gets compiled and now shows that it is the dependencies in the makefile
2018 May 16
1
[RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring
On 2018?04?25? 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the > implementation in this patch may not work as expected, > and some further discussions on the implementation are > needed, e.g. do we have to check the wrap counter when > checking whether a kick is needed? > >