Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Exploding connections"
2001 Mar 02
0
help with roaming profile
I've got a problem loading my roaming profile:
client - win2k
domain controllers - winnt server
profile server - samba 2.0.3
I can log in OK, and the PDC tells the client go attach \\server\userid as
my H: drive. That works, thus samba and the domain controller are properly
exchanging info.
the problem happens right at login though: i can't download my profile.
Windows cannot copy
2006 Jan 27
17
Is it just me, or is Ruby exploding?
I am being barraged with Ruby, Rails and Rich Internet application
work right now. Almost enough that I could quit the day job and make a
go of it, forgetting about Java altogether. Places in the greater
Miami area are turning on to Rails and Ruby -- much of it fueled by
the stronger voices in the local Java community.
Am I alone in this, or do many of you see absolutely explosive growth
in Ruby,
2024 Nov 13
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
Hello,
I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with quotas on those filesystems, etc)
I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs action? If not, I'll start ignoring them.
Nov 11 19:00:45 tm samba-dcerpcd[7373]: [2024/11/11 19:00:45.852391, 0] ../../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log)
Nov 11 19:00:45 tm samba-dcerpcd[7373]:
2024 Nov 18
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with
> quotas on those filesystems, etc)
>
> I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs
> action? If not, I'll start ignoring them.
>
> Nov 11 19:00:45 tm samba-dcerpcd[7373]: [2024/11/11
2024 Nov 19
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On 19/11/24 02:27, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with
>> quotas on those filesystems, etc)
>>
>> I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs
>> action? If not, I'll start
2024 Nov 19
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> On 19/11/24 02:27, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with
>>> quotas on those filesystems, etc)
>>>
>>> I'm seeing these
2024 Nov 20
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hope that helps.
Not much unfortunately.
Running this:
net cache list
will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with
real things, it could indicate where they're coming from. If it fails or
shows a cache full of nonsense, well that is also interesting.
>
> The original messages are long scrolled off the
2024 Nov 21
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 6:31 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> Hope that helps.
>
> Not much unfortunately.
>
> Running this:
>
> net cache list
>
> will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with
> real things, it could indicate where they're coming from. If it fails or
> shows a cache
2024 Nov 21
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On 21/11/24 14:11, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 6:31 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
>> On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> Not much unfortunately.
>>
>> Running this:
>>
>> net cache list
>>
>> will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with
>> real
2004 Dec 01
3
zaptel and low ring voltage
Hi all,
Several months ago we built an * box with a quad-FXO tdm400p (REV e/f).
>From the get-go, there has been a problem where occasionally (2-3 times
a week) zaptel/* will not detect the ringing on a line. (The call will
ring through to telco voicemail).
The problem is not specific to a single line or FXO port on the tdm400p.
I have 2 theories:
#1 - the ring voltage for some calls is
2015 Oct 16
2
Problems with TDBs on CTDB-managed Samba instance
Hi All,
My site has two separate clustered Samba instances (managed by two independent CTDB instances) running over GPFS. In the last couple of weeks, we have seen a recurring issue that causes the `smbd` process in *one* of these instances to become unresponsive (as seen by CTDB), which results in flapping of CTDB and multiple IP takeover runs.
The symptoms that we observe are:
1) Samba
2010 Feb 05
6
large scale paging
Has anyone done any large scale intercom deployments with Asterisk? I've
been asked about building a system to one-way page 500 phones
simultaneously from a single server.
My concerns are:
- My limited math capabilities suggest 41 Mbps of RTP traffic, which
seems like a lot, plus asterisk would be taking a single input stream
and exploding it out to 500 endpoints.
- There are 500
2017 Jan 14
3
Corrupted idmap...
Rowland, I commented out what you asked me to, no change.
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = TRUEVINE
realm = TRUEVINE.LAN
netbios name = DC01
server role = active directory domain controller
server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc,
drepl, winbi$
# idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
# idmap config *:backend = tdb
# idmap
2009 Aug 21
1
Wiki Edits: HowTos/OS_Protection
Hello,
There are some errors on the HowTos/OS_Protection page on the CentOS wiki. I would like to correct the errors.
Thanks,
William Voyek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090821/ad61f2f3/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text
2010 Dec 29
5
Network communication between hosts
Hi,
I need advice about developing C++ program. I need to develop 2 application which must communicate via network using SSL encryption. The problem is in which format to exchange the data. I can use XML format to exchange data between the hosts but a lot traffic will be generated. What are the usual practices to exchange data between the hosts?
Regards
Peter
-------------- next part
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Little problem with 1.x versions (if_indextoname)
Hi,
I have used bridge-utils 0.9.6 so far in a kernel 2.4.26, uClibc and ppc environment.
When I use version 1.0.3 I have the problem that I do not see the brige with the 'brctl show' command if it is not fully set up. It was working with 0.9.6.
I tracked the problem down to an 'incompatibility' in bridge/uClibc/kernel.
0.9.6 uses its own if_indextoname function which uses the
2006 Jan 31
4
has_one without inverse belongs_to
I have two models called entity and user.
The entities table has a column called users_id that contains the user
id of the user that created the entity.
In entity I have...
has_one :user
... as I want to be able to show the user who created the entity from
the entity object.
But this produces the following error...
Mysql::Error: #42S22Unknown column ''users.entity_id'' in
2006 Apr 21
9
Yet another dry question..
One of these days I''ll figure this out, but in the meantime help me be a
better programmer by eliminating some excess code:
I''m trying to check to see if somebody trying to view/edit/update a
product is the owner. In my scaffold I have this code that works:
def edit
@owner = Product.find(params[:id].to_i)
if @owner.user_id == @user.id
@product =
2015 Oct 16
0
Problems with TDBs on CTDB-managed Samba instance
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:44:36PM +0000, Howard, Stewart Jameson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> My site has two separate clustered Samba instances (managed by two independent CTDB instances) running over GPFS. In the last couple of weeks, we have seen a recurring issue that causes the `smbd` process in *one* of these instances to become unresponsive (as seen by CTDB), which results in
2014 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper (redux)
The fundamental problem is that IR has never been treated as "user input" before. It has always been an ephemeral format, and if some component comes along and sees something it doesn't recognize, that is ipso facto a compiler bug, not a user input error, and it's perfectly okay to crash on a compiler bug. Changing that fundamental assumption would be pretty pervasive.
I will