similar to: 2.6.19-rc5-git4 benchmarks

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1937 Christian Kujau <mindrot at nerdbynature.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at nerdbynature.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the

When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the following messages are printed: [28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.685036] Kernel

Ralf Hildebrandt reported[0] the following messages on ext3-users: name_count maxed, losing inode data: dev=00:05, inode=5221 because the filesystem in question is indeed ext3. However, this warning is not generated by ext3 code but by the audit framework. While the origins of these messages are discussed elsewhere[1] the following patch modifies the printks in question so that users know

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [!! i've Cc'ed several fs lists, please remove when when replying !!] hi all, from time to time i do some benchmarks for several filesystems and several crypto-algorithms too, details here: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/ latest results here: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/bonnie.html

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585 --- Comment #8 from mindrot at nerdbynature.de --- Created attachment 2274 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2274&action=edit Include option patch for OpenSSH 6.2 This is really just a modified version of Gavin Beatty's patch, slightly altered so it'll apply cleanly to OpenSSH 6.2 (i.e. yesterdays CVS checkout).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 [cc'ing 4 mailing lists, please reply to *one* list only!] hi, every now and then i'm running some benchmarks on filesystems i really use...here are the results: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/bonnie.html http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/ may it be of some help.... thanks, Christian. PS:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [cc'ing 4 mailing lists, please reply to *one* list only!] hi, i was about to set up a new fs for my desktop machine and i could not decide which fs it should be. i've written a wrapper script for some benchmarks before, but it was not really good. i tried to rewrite it and so, here are the results: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/

Hi, Short version: If I had a CPU with the aes-ni [1] feature would luks use it? I know that Upstream Vendors Security Guide [2] says: ...snip The default cipher used for LUKS (refer to cryptsetup --help) is aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 (ESSIV - Encrypted Salt-Sector Initialization Vector). Note that the installation program, Anaconda, uses by default XTS mode (aes-xts-plain64) snap... I also found a

(depends on Advance Storage Configuration patch) This patch adds the option of requesting, at install time, that swap LVs be encrypted. The modifications include: * Introduction of the ovirt_swap_encrypt install parameter * Inclusion of all required packages * Inclusion of required kernel modules * Introduction of /etc/ovirt-crypttab to hold encrypted swap configuration (Couldn't use

On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:56:22 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Since people were recently complaining about too many warnings: > Here is a list of the warnings I'm getting in MODPOST and later. > > Since the warnings by far exceed the 100kB limit of linux-kernel (sic), > I had to attach them compressed. > > With the exception of the

On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:56:22 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Since people were recently complaining about too many warnings: > Here is a list of the warnings I'm getting in MODPOST and later. > > Since the warnings by far exceed the 100kB limit of linux-kernel (sic), > I had to attach them compressed. > > With the exception of the

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:16:26 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Paravirt breaks CONFIG_X86_PAE=y compilation: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC init/main.o > In file included from include2/asm/pgtable.h:245, > from > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/include/linux/mm.h:40, > from >

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:16:26 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Paravirt breaks CONFIG_X86_PAE=y compilation: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC init/main.o > In file included from include2/asm/pgtable.h:245, > from > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/include/linux/mm.h:40, > from >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, after upgrading to samba 3.0.8 (debian/unstable, i386) i too encounter similar problems as reported here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/095567.html upon logoff from a win2k(sp4) client, the profile cannot be saved and the samba logfile from the client (prinz) gives: [2004/11/26 17:57:06, 2]

Hello ext3-users, we have an oopsy situation here: we have 4 machines: 3 client nodes, 1 master: the master holds a fairly big repository of small files. The repo's current size is ~40GB with ~1.2 M files in ~100 directories. Now, we like to rsync changes from the master to the client nodes, which is working perfectly for 2 nodes, but our 3rd node oopses "sometimes", rendering

OK, at least two patches got dropped on the way from the mm tree to Andi's tree: the desc.h cleanup, and the processor.h rearrangement. Merging into Andi's tree without these patches must have been a nightmare 8( Andi then tried to fix it with x86_64-mm-paravirt-compile.patch but then it didn't boot so he disabled it in x86_64-mm-paravirt-broken.patch This patch undoes those two

OK, at least two patches got dropped on the way from the mm tree to Andi's tree: the desc.h cleanup, and the processor.h rearrangement. Merging into Andi's tree without these patches must have been a nightmare 8( Andi then tried to fix it with x86_64-mm-paravirt-compile.patch but then it didn't boot so he disabled it in x86_64-mm-paravirt-broken.patch This patch undoes those two

Hi I would like to know if it would be possible for me to install wine on a dedicated server in a datacenter withou me being to be there myself (physically). I only have remote acces to fedora linux.