similar to: seeking a developper documentation for jbd and ext3

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "seeking a developper documentation for jbd and ext3"

2006 Sep 22
2
incoming chmod on daemon fails on subdirectories
Running rsync 2.6.8 as daemon on Fedora core 4. Have the following in the rsyncd.conf file... [test] path = /home/test/greenlight # use chroot = true max connections = 3 lock file = /var/lock/rsyncd/test.lock uid = 503 gid = 503 auth users = test incoming chmod = Dg=s,Dug=rwx,Do-rwx,Fug=rw,Fo-rwx Uploading a tree from windows with
2016 Dec 19
1
Aw: rsync show files changed during transfer - how?
At 17:00 19.12.2016, devzero at web.de wrote: >>http://olstrans.sourceforge.net/release/OLS2000-rsync/OLS2000-rsync.html > ><snipp> But the filename twice can happen under other circumstances; if you've seen this happen, it's almost certainly because the file changed during transfer. Rsync does no locking. Which means that: if you are modifying a file while it's
2006 May 22
1
How to learn about ext3?
Hi, I want to learn about ext3 fs from the basics to the inner details. Some hints about links that have that info well explained? Cheers.
2009 Jun 11
1
Key for high CPU usage
Dear List, I'm trying to take a closer look at rsync code, and found when we run daemon, it will take a lot of CPU (400Mhz). So I'm interested in Which part of rsync code on ver 3.0.5 consuming CPU a lot? Can anyone here help to lighten me up? So I can try to improve the performance or low the CPU usage. I suspect that there are a few factors, which might related with CPU usage:
2016 Oct 31
3
rsync show files changed during transfer - how?
i'm using rsync for backup and, as rsync can detect if files have vanished during transfer, i wonder how rsync can tell which files got modified during transfer (i.e. which are not consistent on the destination side after transfer) apparently, rsync can't show that information? wouldn't that be an extremely useful feature if rsync could do another additional mtime or even checksum
2004 Jun 15
6
mode data=journal in ext3. Is it safe to use?
Hello I try again. Can anybody of you acknowledge or not if mode data=journal in ext3 is safe to use in Linux kernel 2.6.x? Wee need to have a very consistent and integrity for our filesystem, and it would then be desired to journal both data and metadata. But if this mode can corrupt the filesystem as both Phil White and Nicolas Kowalski has experienced, it may be more advised to use mode
2004 Jan 19
0
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] benevolent dictatorship, or inclusive developper community?
This probably a dead horse, but this showed up on another list I read and I thought it might be of interest. respectfully to all... Dear all, I have just put online a survey addressing the topic of "good leadership in the open-source environment". Basically, my objective is to identify the personal conceptions of good leadership that reside in the minds of the contributors,
2002 Dec 13
0
Lookig for a french vorbis developper
Hi, This is my first post in this list. I joined it for a little bit special reason that I'll explain. for begginning I'll briefly present myself, I'm french and most implicated in free software promotion in France, I'm working as freelance in free software system administration. No the reason why I joined vorbis-dev, I'm a member of [1]April, an association that promote
2010 Nov 29
0
job offer of Quantitative Developper
Overview Statistical Research Laboratory (SRL) is an established hedge fund and asset management technology company based in London and New York, with significant mandates to provide cutting edge technology solutions to leading investment companies. A highly experienced Quantitative Developer is required to support a rapidly evolving Statitisical Research project based on R. The Quantitative
2004 Jan 06
2
benevolent dictatorship, or inclusive developper community?
sorry for the cross post, but this is germane to the developpers as well as the larger user community. Re: [SIP 0000104]: [patch] Cisco-like NAT trick for outbound SIP connections On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 08:07:29PM -0600, bugs@digium.com wrote: > > A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. tabarnac! it's been months now! the only thing that i can think at this point is that mark
2005 Apr 21
0
Problems with ext3/jbd on 2.4.27-vrs1 with power management
Hello all, I have a question about ext3/jbd for 2.4 as it pertains to the ARM architecture. The presence of the ext3 and/or jbd drivers seem to cause suspend/resume to stop working on our platform (SA1110 (StrongARM) - based). My question is: are there any appropriate patches since 2.4.27 to either ext3 or jbd that may be appropos to this issue. I have also posted to the ARM kernel mailing list
2008 Mar 18
1
Problems patching fs/jbd/checkpoint.c in RHEL4 2.6.9-67.0.4 kernel
My manual patching of the rejects in checkpoint.c didn''t work out; a delete of 10,000 files caused a panic (in any ext fs, not just Lustre). In the new checkpoint.c, two routines expected by the patch no longer exist: __cleanup_transaction and __flush_buffer. I can avoid the panic if I omit (don''t try to manually patch) the following: Index: linux-2.6.9/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
2006 Aug 27
1
how can I get the 64bit JBD patch?
I see that ocfs2 has used 64bit JBD. I want to know where is the 64bit JBD patch? Whether the patch is developed by ocfs2 or not? Whether the patch is developed by JBD itself? Anyone can help me? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20060828/98fdb6c1/attachment.html
2010 Aug 02
1
JBD: failed to read block at offset
Im getting errors like JBD: failed to read block at offset 4360 on a raid 5 parition , have run several fcsk on it.... are these Journal errors recoverable? I've done a physical scan of the hard disks with HP insight manager as well -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This message,
2002 Sep 06
1
kjournald & jbd
Hello everybody, Could someone please explain to me what is the difference between kjournald and jbd (precisely, what does each of them do?) Thank you, Alina _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
2010 Jul 06
0
[PATCH 0/6 v6][RFC] jbd[2]: enhance fsync performance when using CFQ
Hi Jeff, On 07/03/2010 03:58 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Hi, > > Running iozone or fs_mark with fsync enabled, the performance of CFQ is > far worse than that of deadline for enterprise class storage when dealing > with file sizes of 8MB or less. I used the following command line as a > representative test case: > > fs_mark -S 1 -D 10000 -N 100000 -d /mnt/test/fs_mark -s
2009 Sep 23
0
jbd/kjournald oops on 2.6.30.1
Hi, I am getting the following Oops on 2.6.30.1 kernel. The bad part is, it happens rarely (twice in last 1.5 months) and the system is pretty lightly loaded when this happens (no heavy file/disk io). Any insights or patches that I can try? (i searched lkml and ext3 lists but could not find any similar oops/reports). == Oops =================== BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
2003 Jun 13
1
jbd count incremented *even* if volume is mounted RO?
Continuing on with my earlier post . . . after looking through code of JBD, is the following perhaps the difference in why the md5 values differ; When a journalled filesystem that uses jbd is mounted the journal b_count is incremented by one? *EVEN* if the volume was mounted read only, this b_count is still increased by one? curious as ever! lt __________________________________ Do you
2005 Nov 16
0
(large, external) data journal BUG (Assertion failure in __journal_drop_transaction() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:626: "transaction->t_forget == NULL")
Hi, A couple of our important servers, both running FC4 but one i386 and one x86_64, have been crashing recently. They both are running ext3 data=journal with large external journals and high commit intervals. Both machines use the gdth driver for their hardware RAID sets, if that's of any use. I think the hardware is good in both cases. I hope someone finds this data useful enough to be
2002 Dec 06
1
Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at fs/jbd/transaction.c:746
I guess this could be filed under the 'shot myself in the foot' section, but I figured I'd report it anyways.. Kernel 2.5.50-bk6, x86, preempt, PIIX IDE, ext3 fs. I dd'ed the first part of a ext3 partition to tmp, then mounted it via loopback. (the image passed a fsck, except for warning about corrupt part. table or superblock) I tried to 'cd' into a directory within