similar to: NetBIOS keepalives.

Hi Folks, Where is the best place to feed back patches and problem reports for Samba these days? Should I be using "samba-patches@samba.org"? This list? The samba-technical list? The samba-bugs address bounces back an auto-response telling one to use samba-patches for well-formed patches, but if the Jitterbug web interface is to be believed then submissions to samba-patches seem to be

Hi folks, I have a Solaris 8 machine, running Samba 2.2.2, acting as a domain controller. Several different people in the Department do administrative work, such as adding client machines to the network. Rather than a single shared root password we've historically given each sysadmin a root equivelent account, so that in addition to root account there are several other administrator accounts

Bonjour, I'm running samba 2.0.4 on a Sparc Solaris 2.5.1 and I have some error logs when I'm trying to connect to a sharing directory from *some* NT4 WS (SP4 or SP5): pchp2 (194.xxx.xxx.xxx) connect to service centreAS as user truc (uid=1326, gid=1320) (pid 22939) [1999/08/26 15:52:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(415) write_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe [1999/08/26

Hello, I try to exectute a command on my NT server from my unix server with the following command : smbclient \\\\monnet01\\C$ -U admin_nan -c "help.exe" C$ is my share admin_nan is the user Smbclient doesn't ask a password so i get the following error message : Anonymous login successful Domain=[FR-MON] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0] tree connect failed: ERRDOS

Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40, Geb.

I've got Redhat 6.2 kernel 2.2.18 and have been running samba 2.07. When I try to configure samba 2.2.0, the configure bombs out with an error ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe with what I think relevant lines from the configure output are: checking for Linux kernel oplocks... no checking for fcntl locking... no Is there something I have to enable in the Kernel for

Well you won't find them shouting about it, but if you dig down in their web pages on Solaris 9 you'll find this : "Common Linux applications, such as Samba, Apache, Linux (GNU) commands, etc., are included in the Solaris 9 Operating Environment. The Solaris Software Companion CD has an even more comprehensive set of free software." So I guess that means we made it onto the OS

Newbie question! We currently are running a product call TAS from Syntax Corporation and would like to move to Samba. I have review the documentation and cannot find how to set up muliple services on one server. I tried using the Netbios name = and the include statement to bring in another smb.conf file but I don't think I'm on the right track.

Andrew: One additional issue that came up with trying to configure the SMB.CONF file: The "Using Samba" book from O'Reilly says to start up my browser and go to "http://localhost:901, to use the SWAT package. This did not work. My IE 5.0 came back with an unable to locate or connect to the specified host. I know the /etc/services file was modified correctly, I checked it

How do you undo the Plain Text Password Registry hack in Windows? How do I reverse it after it has been applied? Daniel Hardy metaSENSORS, Inc. 358 Hungerford Drive Rockville, Maryland 20850 Tel: (301) 762-3078 ext. 35 Fax: (301) 340-0769 Email: danh@metasensors.com On the Web at www.metasensors.com -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Installed v205 for Solaris8, and successfully exec'd tests 1-7 -- but failed 8-10 -- in //doc/docs/textdocs/DIAGNOSIS.txt. Errors... TEST 8 "System error 5 has occured. Access is denied." TESTS 9 & 10 "The account is not authorized to log in from this station." I recall from a previous life that the solution is to modify a registry key (EnablePlainTextPassword or

Hi all, I would like to do something like this at Samba level: hosts allow = subnet1/mask1 subnet2/mask2 etc hosts deny = * But this doesn't seem to work (machine that are not in subnet1 and not in subnet2 still have access) I think the * is not understood by Samba, I tried ALL, this didn't work either. I'm gonna check the samba source code but if I could get an expert answer

Dear All, we are experiencing severe problems with Samba 2.2.0 (with quota support) running on a dual processor (400MHz) Sun E450 running Solaris 2.7. This is used as a central file server for student diskspace, accessed by approx 1200 PCs running NT 4. Up until recently we experienced some, what we assume to be, loading issues with connections during the middle of the day being slow.

Need SIP KEEPALIVES in Asterisk, but QUALIFY won't presently work for you (due to it's channel disabling behavior)? Someone posted on the list that they would like to split "keepalives" and "qualify" into different features. Sounds like a good plan, but until that is done you can turn "qualify=" into a keepalive mechanism, without disabling your channels.

I'm running a fairly simple samba server on a sun V440, solaris 9 Samba version: 3.0.10 smbd daemon only In the server logs I'm getting: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 5: ERRNO = Broken pipe Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Broken pipe) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 Closing connections Yielding

Hi I'm looking for help in netbios-ssn problem we ecountered. Our server is HP UNIX 10.20, and samba is 2.0.7. recently, we can saw error message in syslog.log file: "netbios-ssn/tcp: accept: Resource temporarily unavailable" and, from log.smb, we can see beblow message: Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Invalid argument) [2003/11/08 03:56:54, 0]

samba2.07,nt4sp6a I run a samba-server with 15nt-clients on a 100MBit-Switch. Now I faced extremely poor performance and really have no idea why. I even dont know if it can be a samba-problem. When copying myriads of small file from a client to the server or vice versa I get bad performance: 1000 files a 16kb: ~80seconds = 200kb/second But this is highspeed compared to copying from nt to nt:

Hello, I need an answer to the following problem: I have a Samba server with domain logons enabled and with encrypt passwords=no. So I don't use the smbpasswd file, only the Unix password files. When I try to logon with a Win95 client (client for Microsoft Networks, logging on to a domain), people with mixed-case passwords cannot logon to the Samba logon server. Those with a password in

Qualify=yes will send a SIP OPTIONS periodically and keep the NAT open, if you use 1 to 1 NAT (versus PAT where it is "many to one NAT") it will work because port 5060 on the private address will still be port 5060 on the public address. With PAT the port could be anything over 1024, but usually much higher, and the originator will send to port 5060, which your NAT router will drop.

We have 4 class C networks, 199.129.206.* 199.129.207.* 199.129.208.* 199.129.209.* I see IP addresses from all 4 classes thru tcpdump. Some of these computers broadcast as C-class computers; eg, to 199.129.206.255 Some broadcast to 255.255.255.255 Of course, several C class networks would induce me to use a B-class broadcast, 199.129.255.255 This works for the computers I