similar to: hosts allow/deny question

Dear Ivan Thanks a lot for this very nice example. Is it true that all.equal just compares y values? Based on this help here I think so and the value I got is the difference for the y-values. https://www.statology.org/all-equal-function-r/ However, here I see x and y testing? https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/base/versions/3.6.2/topics/all.equal I am actually interested in the x values

? Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:32:58 +0200 <sibylle.stoeckli at gmx.ch> ?????: > # values and mask r1 > r1 <- getValues(r1) > mask1 <- is.na(r1) > # Do the same for r2 > r2 <- getValues(r2_resampled) > mask2 <- is.na(r2) > > # Combine the masks > all.equal(r1[!(mask1 & mask2)], r2[!(mask1 & mask2)]) Let's consider a more tangible example: # The

Cool thanks # values and mask r1 r1 <- getValues(r1) mask1 <- is.na(r1) # Do the same for r2 r2 <- getValues(r2_resampled) mask2 <- is.na(r2) # Combine the masks all.equal(r1[!(mask1 & mask2)], r2[!(mask1 & mask2)]) output > all.equal(r1[!(mask1 & mask2)], r2[!(mask1 & mask2)]) [1] "'is.NA' value mismatch: 389 in current 56989152 in target"

"Is it true that all.equal just compares y values?" The following may be a bit more than you may have wanted, but I hope it is nevertheless useful. The first place you should go to for questions like this is the Help system, not here, i.e. ?all.equal When you do this, you will find that all.equal() is a so-called S3 generic function, which, among other things, means that it works

? Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:35:35 +0200 <sibylle.stoeckli at gmx.ch> ?????: > what do you mean by use is.na() in getValues(). So I need to call > getValues a second time? Not necessarily, but it's one of the options. I was thinking along the lines of: values1 <- getValues(r1) mask1 <- is.na(values1) # Do the same for r2 # Combine the masks all.equal(values1[!combined_mask],

?? The OP's original problem is that the all.equal method for raster objects (raster:::all.equal.raster), which is a wrapper around the compareRaster() function, compares a bunch of different properties of rasters (extent, resolution, values, etc.) and only returns a single overall logical (TRUE/FALSE) value. OP wanted to see the magnitude of the difference (as you could get for more

Ah...I see. Perhaps, then, the maintainer should be contacted, as the desired functionality seems similar to that provided in other all.equal methods. I realize that this may often not elicit a (prompt) response. -- Bert On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:50?AM Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com> wrote: > > The OP's original problem is that the all.equal method for raster >

I have 1 100MB NIC with two 2MB-subnets trough a router behind it. I''d like to create multiple default classes: 1: + |\_ 1:10 default, ceiling 100000kbit, rate 96000kbit | |\_ 1:11 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 2048kbit | | | |\_1:110 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 1536kbit | \_1:111 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 512kbit (default subnet1) | \_ 1:12 ceiling 2048kbit, rate

Hi there. Currently, our network design has two ISP lines and 3 subnets for LAN. Below are some details :- eth0 - isp1 eth1 - isp2 eth2 - subnet1 eth3 - subnet2 eth4 - subnet3 What i wanted to do is to assign incoming port 80 to our local squid server running on the firewall itself and assigned it to eth0(ISP1). I think it shouldnt be a problem as /etc/shorewall/rules provides a sample of the

good morning all, i have an interesting issue with browsing. details: i have three subnets. (subnet1, subnet2, and subnet3) i have a samba server on each subnet. (samba1, samba2, and samba3) i have a windows 2000 server on subnet1. (m$1) samba1 is the domain master and wins server with ip 192.168.0.1 win2k clients authenticate to their local server and wins is set to 192.168.0.1. when i run a

Hi, I want to make a data frame which contains the positions of some searched values in another data frame. Like: Dataframe 1: 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 2 4 1 2 3 2 3 4 1 Let's say I searched on "4", then Dataframe 2 should contain: x y 1 4 1 8 2 3 2 7 3 1 3 7 I have written a routine, but it seems to me that it isn't that perfect: x<- 0

On 5/16/2013 11:17 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > > Would this TRI function solve your problem? >[...] > /// > /// Covering = getCoveringLanes(); > /// MaskA = getSubRegIndexLaneMask(SubA); > /// MaskB = getSubRegIndexLaneMask(SubB); > /// > /// If (MaskA & ~(MaskB & Covering)) == 0, then SubA is completely covered by > /// SubB.

A number of you are flailing around trying to get the subject combination to work. You should all be aware that there are parts of this that don''t currently work and that won''t work well until there are enhancements made to Shorewall (and probably to Netfilter). I. There is no clean way currently to support Road Warriors from a Masquerading Netfilter firewall/gateway. As

Hi, I am configuring a network with two subnets with a different workgroup in each subnet. My aim is to have users being able to view and access shares on both workgroups. I have a Samba server in each subnet/workgroup, configured as both the domain and local master for each workgroup. Each server is also the WINS server for its subnet. The setup is like this: Subnet1: network -

Greetings, I just received some netweb-301 phones frm Seshu down in NJ. I cannot for the life of me get it to register with the asterisk server, nor upgrade the firmware to the latest (1.41) i'm still using 1.37. The packets are traversing the router, going into the other subnet, hitting the asterisk box, but not actually making it to asterisk. Nothing in the asterisk logs, but tcpdump

Hello Kevin, We have a  Samba/Windows20008R2 domain that's been running a few years now. Here are the details: * clients auth with SSSD (ldap, kerberos, ldap_schema=rfc2307bis) * idmap * samba on clients/server for joining domain We have scripts that automatically create users with UnixHomeDir, UID and GUID numbers within AD. I don't know about using WInbind...  I dropped that

On May 16, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > The function TII::canCombineSubRegIndices has been gone for a while now, and I was wondering if there is a target-independent way of determining if a certain set of physical registers "adds up" to a larger register. For example, on X86, AL and AH together form AX. On Hexagon, R0 and R1 are

The problem is that I have only 2 ethernet adapters in my linux router, one of this adapter pluged to the LAN and the other is pluged to a HUB who have 2 routers DSL. Each DSL routers have an static ip and the solution that I found was creating an eth0 and eth0:1 but with this option I have any way to use the eth0:1 adapte... Any one knows a solution for this ? Regards.

The function TII::canCombineSubRegIndices has been gone for a while now, and I was wondering if there is a target-independent way of determining if a certain set of physical registers "adds up" to a larger register. For example, on X86, AL and AH together form AX. On Hexagon, R0 and R1 are D0. The context here is an attempt to coalesce multiple loads/stores into fewer loads/stores

Hi, Is there a way in Linux to do NAT with a pool of outside addresses such that each connection to the outside resource gets a different IP address?? I don''t want 1:1 NAT as I have some thousands of IP addresses on one side of the LARTC router that _may_ need to access a resource on the other side... The resource needs to see a different IP address for each active call, but these