similar to: query_name_response: Multiple responses received

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "query_name_response: Multiple responses received"

2016 Mar 03
2
query_name_response: Multiple (2)
Hello, does someone could explain me what means this message : query_name_response: Multiple (2).... example : samba4 nmbd[88458]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.151.237 for name SAMBA_DOMAIN<1d>. samba4 nmbd[88458]: This response was from IP 192.168.152.237, reporting an IP address of 192.168.152.237. The server has 3 nic (vlans)
2016 Feb 05
2
query_name_response: Multiple (2)
Hello, does someone could explain me what means this message : query_name_response: Multiple (2).... example : samba4 nmbd[88458]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.151.237 for name SAMBA_DOMAIN<1d>. samba4 nmbd[88458]: This response was from IP 192.168.152.237, reporting an IP address of 192.168.152.237. The server has 3 nic (vlans)
1998 Oct 21
1
It's just stopped working! (1.9.18p8, IRIX 5.3)
Hi all, I'm extremely puzzled by the behaviour of one of my Samba servers. It's been working fine for yonks, and this morning (abuout 11:32) it just stopped. (mostly) Connecting to shares still works. Navigating the tree till works. Changing (DOS) attributes still works. But actually opening files and reading the contents doesn't work. The client just times out (Win 3.11, and
2016 Mar 03
1
query_name_response: Multiple (2)
> On 03/03/16 08:23, Pascal Legrand wrote: >> Hello, >> >> does someone could explain me what means this message : >> query_name_response: Multiple (2).... >> >> >> example : >> >> samba4 nmbd[88458]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses >> received for a query on subnet 192.168.151.237 for name SAMBA_DOMAIN<1d>. >>
2000 Jun 06
0
Fw: Time Synchronisation
Thank you very much, it was the setting on the RS6000. Whoever originally setup our box didn't specify the BST time offset correctly. The system was reading TZ=GMT0BST0,M3.5.0,M10.5.0 Thanks to everyone that contributed to solving a simple and obvious error !!!! :) Mike ________________________________________________________________________________________ >From "John Ryan"
2002 Mar 08
1
tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed on Samba 2.2.3a startup
Hi all,. I'm getting this:- [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1274) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1314) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:(475) tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed (fd=7) at offset 4 rw_type=2 lck_type=6 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] smbd/connection.c:(156) claiming 0 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 0]
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
elsewhere in the file, which I doubt) the problem probably lies with printcap. Your smb.conf looks OKay (except for the 'path' mentioned above). >This is Printcap: >This Works. ># HP DeskJet 1220c printer: >HP1220c:sd=/var/spool/lpd/HP1220c:rw:sh:rm=hp1220c:rp=raw: > >This doesn't work. ># HP OfficeJet K80:
1998 Aug 05
0
USE_WAITPID in IRIX (SGI5). Does it work?
Hi all, I'm running Samba 1.9.18p8 on an SG Challenge (L) with IRIX 5.3 Every so often (maybe once a month (ish)) samba goes mad, and we get loads and loads of 'smbd' processes created which fill up the process table, causing many 'fork() failed: too many processes' errors. Eventually, with a slice of luck we can get to execute a 'kill' command on them and the
1998 Oct 02
1
Win95 and mixed case passwords (1.9.18p8)
Hi there, I've just tripped over a problem I thought only existed in WfWg3.11. On Win95 clients connecting to a 1.9.18p8 Samba server (IRIX 5.3) the first logon dialog box seems to have a problem with mixed-case passwords. If I have a lower case password, then I can just enter it in the Win95 'Microsoft Network' logon dialog at startup, and all the shares are reconnected. If I
2002 Feb 19
1
Doco conflict (smb.conf(5) vs. HOWTO-Collection)
Hi all, There seems to be a conflict in the online documentation as to the 'security =' level and the 'add user script'. http://ie.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN1146 says that you have to have 'security = user' in order to have Samba behave as a PDC. Further on :- http://ie.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN1231 it says
2002 Mar 15
0
passwd change program runs as user, not root!
Hi all, I've been working (hard) on password sync (with NIS) here and it's now ready to roll. However, there's a problem. If I use '% smbpasswd -r nnpdc' from the UNIX command line, then the password change program runs as root and the NIS gets updated. If I use 'c:\> net password \\nnpdc' (from an Win98 box) then the password change program runs as the user
2002 Feb 26
3
unix password sync doesn't update smbpasswd file!
Hi all, I'm using 2.2.3 on FreeBSD 4.5 RELEASE and trying to get 'smbpasswd' to change the encrypted password and the UNIX password (/etc/passwd). I'm getting strange behaviour. Having worked through debugging my 'chat script', I now have the following situation:- When unix password sync = yes smbpasswd works, but only the UNIX password is changed When unix password
2002 Mar 06
1
Possible bug in 2.2.3a source/script/installbin.sh (with patch)
Hi all, the file samba-2.2.3a/source/script/installbin.sh has a rather odd blindspot. It doesn't honor the --with-privatedir= option to ./configure it just blindly uses $BASEDIR/private instead. I think the fix would be:- a) move directory creation out of installbin.sh altogehter (after all what's the installdirs: target for in the Makefile?) OR b) add an extra parameter
2023 Apr 01
1
Standalone - Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet ...
Current Version: samba 4.18.1 All, I have several **standalone** servers on a subnet, and for quite some time, I have received log messages in other standalone machines about multiple responses from the WINS server. There is only a single WINS server on the network (as it has been since samba 2.02 or earlier). The WINS server is 192.168.6.14. The log message that is received for example
2002 Feb 19
4
Doco! ARGH! (smbpasswd's not up to date on the web site)
Hi all, (again) The page:- http://ie.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smbpasswd.8.html does not have any description of the '-j' option. However:- http://ie.samba.org/samba/ftp/docs/htmldocs/smbpasswd.8.html does. Why is this a big issue ? (worthof a post to the mailing list?) because the first URL above is linked off the main 'Documentation' page of the Samba web site
2000 Jun 06
4
WINS serving
Hi all, I use Samba (nmbd) for WINS serving round here. Any one know how to set up two WINS servers (on different machines for resilience) using Samba? Also, whislt I'm on the subject. Suppose I have a machine with multiple (physical) interfaces, each with a unique IP address. When it ('s nmbd) registers with teh WINS server does it register all its addresses? Moreover, when the
2002 Oct 01
2
default for 'writeable ='
Hi all, 'Using Samba' (and it's companion 'Pocket Reference') both say that the default for the 'writable' option in smb.conf is 'YES'. But, http://ie.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html says the default is 'no'. Which is right? Mac Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk
2016 Feb 05
0
query_name_response: Multiple (2)
On 05/02/16 14:36, Pascal Legrand wrote: > Hello, > > does someone could explain me what means this message : > query_name_response: Multiple (2).... > > > example : > > samba4 nmbd[88458]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses > received for a query on subnet 192.168.151.237 for name SAMBA_DOMAIN<1d>. > > samba4 nmbd[88458]: This response was from
2002 May 28
0
query_name_response error
Hello, I've looked through multiple mailing list archives and cannot find an answer to this problem, but have found many others who are having the same problem. I hope this list can help. I have a Solaris 2.7 server running Samba 2.0.5 with multiple interfaces: hme0: 172.17.5.56 public qfe0: 172.18.30.36 backup network qfe1: 192.168.30.36 private qfe3: 172.18.10.36 private I have Samba
2002 Jun 07
0
RE: [SOLUTION]query_name_response error
Hi all, I don't make it a point to answer my own posts, but I thought this information would be useful: In researching the problem our client was having below, I found that there were two NT servers on the same subnet as my Unix server running Samba. Both these NT servers were "arguing" over who was the master browser for that network segment. Once the NT SysAdmin corrected the