similar to: Samba and IIS question

Hi, I have this webroot /webdir/ with 2775 permission so that any created file/directory by apache inside of /webdir/ will be 'users:webusers'. However, I noticed when the apache created a new files (fileB) / directories (dirB), the ownership becomes 'apache:apache' and the sgid has gone for /webdir/ (drwxrwxr-x). I'm currently using Wordpress. [before] drwxrwsr-x users

I've noticed that my nightly tester doesn't seem to be reporting the results of running llvm-test, only build warnings and make check. Checking with -verbose shows that it's running the test suite, so I don't quite understand what's going on. Looking at http://llvm.org/nightlytest/ shows that none of the other Linux testers are reporting test suite results either.

Hello. I create one full backup, then another backup based on that, using --link-dest to reduce the size of the following backups, but the result is very suprising. the full backup seems to be reduzed in size!! I've reduced the commands to the bare minimum that still procduces the str. ange result. mkdir -p /tmp/full_20110329_122743 mkdir -p /tmp/20110329_125251 rsync --archive -e

Hard to tell what's wrong. Perhaps /usr/local/bin is not part of path for a cron job? You should add NewNightlyTest.pl -noremove -release options. That leaves the build directory around for you examine it afterwards. Just manually delete the build directory before running NewNightlyTest.pl. Evan On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > I've noticed that my nightly

Robert Gehr wrote: | I still have the problem while openig MS Word and Excel files. When I do so | for the first time, Excel or Word comes up and once | the Applicaion has loaded it displays a grey screen whit the hour glass. It | take up to 15s or more to even open a small Word | document say 20K or so. Once the thing has been opened the Application is | closed and another document gets selected

Casey Dinsmore wrote: > Anyhow I have experienced some strange things and wonder if there might > be a option that I don't know to set that may fix the strange > occourances we've been having.. Quickbooks Pro 6.0 can run in a > multi-user mode, in which up to 5 users can work on the datafile > simultainously. > My share is as follows. > locking = no This looks

Hi, This is my rsync command /usr/bin/rsync --compress \ --verbose \ --rsh=ssh \ --times \ --owner \ --group \ --ignore-times \ --links \ --perms \ --recursive \ --size-only \

A moderately-frequently asked question is "why do automounted directories in shares disappear?" The old answers were: 1) they timed out and auto-un-mounted, and 2) you shouldn't re-export NFS-imported stuff anyway. A new answer (0) was just suggested by a Sun techie: add a "browse" option to the automounter map entry, to make them appear even when they're not

Gregory Hosler <greg@camelot.eno.ericsson.se> wrote: > Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. > Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In > the event log I see messages like: > > The redirector has times out a request to <server name> > > This did not used to happen.

Dear Dave, Doesn't this only work if you're using samba as a domain controller and the client says "net use h: /home" I've not got it to redirect "//server1/username" to "//server2/username" when the NIS map says "user server2:/path/&" Though if it could be done I'd be VERY keen. Tim "David Collier-Brown"

Anyone have any input on this one. I'm running Samba version 1.9.18p10 on an HP9000 HP_UX 10.20. An NT 4.0 server writes files to a UNIX directory and periodically a shell script runs to process any new files found. Occasionally a file isn't found for several hours after it has been created, then mysteriously appears in the UNIX directory. So far this hasn't been a major

Solaris samba 2.0.6 with largefile support running on ultra 10 with solaris 2.7 patch level 106541-07. Clients are win98 and win2000 importing a 10G share from the solaris machine. Using a small C program that writes 1M chunks to a file I can write a file as large as the partition will support. Using the system backup program to write a system backup to a file on the share the program dies with a

John Wilkes wrote: > I can't get samba to work reliably. Win98 machines can map a network > drive via Samba, but writing large files to the Linux box fails. I get > error messages that all are some variation on this ... > [2000/02/20 22:38:31, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(560) > write_socket(6,39) wrote 39 > [2000/02/20 22:38:31, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(468)

Hi all, I've installed samba on a sun sparc-station with solaris 2.5. But when i'm doing something that's using the network really intense (like mp3-files playing over the network) the feed is not constant. With mp3 files you can that because you have pauses during the playing of the song. Is this a configuration mistake or something ? cu, Patrick

Hi all, I've looked about and I can't find anything on Quotas and SAMBA with FreeBSD. The FreeBSD manual says that I can enable quotas and how to go about it, but I get the feeling this is just for shell accounts. Quotas would be useless in my situation if they did not work with SAMBA as well. All my SAMBA users have shell accounts as well and only save to their home directory - either

After fixing nested () problem manual run nighttest finished successfully with one remarkable logged problem: INITIALIZED CVS Root = :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:2401/var/cvs/llvm BuildDir = /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night/build WebDir = /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night/testresults-X86-FreeBSD Prefix = /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/2004-09-06

You wrote: > I am writing a news article about the rulings in the cphack and DVD cases > and how they could impact reverse engineering in the United States. > It appears that new interpretations of fair use provisions in copyright law > could force reverse engineering offshore. [We can discuss this in detail in private email, which you may quote freely, but here's an overview

You wrote: I have been disappointed that I can't use Linux+Samba as an alternative to a Win9x or NT server for our GP medical practice. The software we need runs in win9x. We crave stability. But Linux+Samba is just much slower as a file server. It's normally quite fast: are you running over a dial-up network, requiring you to adust MTU's for speed??? If not, try ``socket

Slow connections login isnt too bad ... 4 sec. tops but its at least 10 seconds or more to access Samba shared Printers or Directories. this is a 10/100 network using Redhat 6.0 with Samba 2.0.5a ... everything works great Except for access times. for example Win9x --> NT its relatively Quick. Is this an Authorization Default that checks every access to Shared objects ? security is all

My problem that I don't know a good practic way to measure performance of my system I need fileserver for Win9x machines with files share with dos applications Friendly speaking I need to choose between WinNT and Linux I know there are a lot of parameters in for ex in smb.conf but how to play with it? may be there are some utilities or etc. Any help will be appreciated Thanks in advance