Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Multiple Services on one Server"
2017 Dec 20
2
glusterfs, ganesh, and pcs rules
Hi,
I've just created again the gluster with NFS ganesha. Glusterfs version 3.8
When I run the command gluster nfs-ganesha enable - it returns a success.
However, looking at the pcs status, I see this:
[root at tlxdmz-nfs1 ~]# pcs status
Cluster name: ganesha-nfs
Stack: corosync
Current DC: tlxdmz-nfs2 (version 1.1.16-12.el7_4.5-94ff4df) - partition
with quorum
Last updated: Wed Dec 20
2017 Dec 21
0
glusterfs, ganesh, and pcs rules
Hi,
In your ganesha-ha.conf do you have your virtual ip adresses set something like this?:
VIP_tlxdmz-nfs1="192.168.22.33"
VIP_tlxdmz-nfs2="192.168.22.34"
Renaud
De?: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] De la part de Hetz Ben Hamo
Envoy??: 20 d?cembre 2017 04:35
??: gluster-users at gluster.org
Objet?: [Gluster-users]
2017 Dec 24
1
glusterfs, ganesh, and pcs rules
I checked, and I have it like this:
# Name of the HA cluster created.
# must be unique within the subnet
HA_NAME="ganesha-nfs"
#
# The gluster server from which to mount the shared data volume.
HA_VOL_SERVER="tlxdmz-nfs1"
#
# N.B. you may use short names or long names; you may not use IP addrs.
# Once you select one, stay with it as it will be mildly unpleasant to
# clean up
2011 Oct 10
2
can't snapshot
Good morning Btrfs list,
I am trying to create a subvolume of a directory tree (approximately 1.1
million subvolumes under nfs1). The following error is thrown and
without the wiki I don''t know what argument is needed. I am running
kernel 3.1.0-rc4.
[root@btrfs ~]# btrfs sub snapshot /btrfs/nfs1/ /btrfs/snaps/
Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot
[root@btrfs ~]# btrfs sub list
2014 Aug 01
2
Live blockcopy onto storage pool that is an NFS mount?
Hello,
I am running qemu-kvm 1.4.0 and libvirt 1.0.2 on Ubuntu 12.04. I have two NFS
mountpoints configured as two separate pools in virsh:
<pool type='dir'>
<name>nfs1</name>
<uuid>419d799c-2493-6ebc-6848-53b0919e7bad</uuid>
<capacity unit='bytes'>6836057014272</capacity>
<allocation unit='bytes'>0</allocation>
2010 Jul 13
5
Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has
done it before.
On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The
clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance
issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating
the client is not an option at
2008 Jan 25
2
strange xen memory calculations?
Hi,
I have started the xen kernel with parameter dom0_mem=300M.
xm info | grep total
total_memory : 2045
Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 300 2 r----- 292.1
FTP 822 1 56.7
LDAP 1 822 1 r----- 541.3
NFS1 822 1 14.8
NFS2 822 1 1.4
For the
2014 Mar 06
1
CTDB and NFS4
Hi everyone,
I'm sorry if this has already been covered somewhere, but I've had a look
and can't find it. Also if there is a better place for this question,
please let me know.
I know that the CTDB documentation states that only NFS2/3 are supported
with CTDB but what I'd really like to know is why NFS4 won't work and if
NFS4 support is planned for the future (timeline?).
2000 Aug 31
4
Execution on NT
Hello,
I try to exectute a command on my NT server from my unix server with the
following command :
smbclient \\\\monnet01\\C$ -U admin_nan -c "help.exe"
C$ is my share
admin_nan is the user
Smbclient doesn't ask a password so i get the following error message :
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[FR-MON] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0]
tree connect failed: ERRDOS
2001 Apr 18
2
Configure error 2.2.0 - no locking
I've got Redhat 6.2 kernel 2.2.18 and have been running samba 2.07.
When I try to configure samba 2.2.0, the configure bombs out with
an error
ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
with what I think relevant lines from the configure output are:
checking for Linux kernel oplocks... no
checking for fcntl locking... no
Is there something I have to enable in the Kernel for
2002 May 22
3
Sun finally ships Samba as standard on Solaris 9
Well you won't find them shouting about it, but if you dig down
in their web pages on Solaris 9 you'll find this :
"Common Linux applications, such as Samba, Apache, Linux (GNU) commands,
etc., are included in the Solaris 9 Operating Environment. The Solaris
Software Companion CD has an even more comprehensive set of free software."
So I guess that means we made it onto the OS
2000 Jul 05
1
ADDITIONAL ISSUE
Andrew:
One additional issue that came up with trying to configure the SMB.CONF
file:
The "Using Samba" book from O'Reilly says to start up my browser and go to
"http://localhost:901, to use the SWAT package.
This did not work. My IE 5.0 came back with an unable to locate or connect
to
the specified host.
I know the /etc/services file was modified correctly, I checked it
2000 Jul 17
2
Plain Text Passwords
How do you undo the Plain Text Password Registry hack in Windows? How do I
reverse it after it has been applied?
Daniel Hardy
metaSENSORS, Inc.
358 Hungerford Drive
Rockville, Maryland 20850
Tel: (301) 762-3078 ext. 35
Fax: (301) 340-0769
Email: danh@metasensors.com
On the Web at www.metasensors.com
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2000 Aug 10
1
EnablePlainTextPassword for Win2K
Installed v205 for Solaris8, and successfully
exec'd tests 1-7 -- but failed 8-10 -- in
//doc/docs/textdocs/DIAGNOSIS.txt. Errors...
TEST 8
"System error 5 has occured. Access is denied."
TESTS 9 & 10
"The account is not authorized to log in from
this station."
I recall from a previous life that the solution
is to modify a registry key
(EnablePlainTextPassword or
2000 Aug 24
2
hosts allow/deny question
Hi all,
I would like to do something like this at Samba level:
hosts allow = subnet1/mask1 subnet2/mask2 etc
hosts deny = *
But this doesn't seem to work (machine that are not in subnet1 and
not in subnet2 still have access)
I think the * is not understood by Samba, I tried ALL, this didn't
work either. I'm gonna check the samba source code but if I could
get an expert answer
2016 Aug 29
6
CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody
Hi,
We are running a cluster under CentOS 6.6. We recently attached a new
NAS device, running CentOS 6.8 and rsync'd our user file system to it.
We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the
group). We copied over the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files from our
front-end server to our NAS server. If we log in to the NAS server we
see the files owned by their
2016 Aug 29
0
CentOS 6: files now owned by nobody:nobody
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:59:31 -0400
Pat Haley wrote:
> We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody
Here are my notes for dealing with this issue:
If all users come up as nobody on a nfs mount:
Add nfs server name to the Domain = line in /etc/idmapd.conf on both the server and the clients, i.e. Domain = nameof.server
/sbin/service rpcidmapd restart
/sbin/service nfslock restart
2010 Apr 08
1
ZFS monitoring - best practices?
We''re starting to grow our ZFS environment and really need to start
standardizing our monitoring procedures.
OS tools are great for spot troubleshooting and sar can be used for
some trending, but we''d really like to tie this into an SNMP based
system that can generate graphs for us (via RRD or other).
Whether or not we do this via our standard enterprise monitoring tool
or
2006 Jul 01
1
The ZFS Read / Write roundabout
Hey all -
Was playing a little with zfs today and noticed that when I was
untarring a 2.5gb archive both from and onto the same spindle in my
laptop, I noticed that the bytes red and written over time was seesawing
between approximately 23MB/s and 0MB/s.
It seemed like we read and read and read till we were all full up, then
wrote until we were empty, and so the cycle went.
Now: as it happens,
2000 Aug 23
2
network extremely slow
samba2.07,nt4sp6a
I run a samba-server with 15nt-clients on a 100MBit-Switch. Now I
faced extremely poor performance and really have no idea why. I even
dont know if it can be a samba-problem.
When copying myriads of small file from a client to the server or vice
versa I get bad performance:
1000 files a 16kb: ~80seconds = 200kb/second
But this is highspeed compared to copying from nt to nt: