Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Need your help."
2017 Feb 24
0
Fail to create samba user Q01
Hi folks
I face a problem when creating a samba user, Here is the detail:
(1) Phenomenon
I have created a linux user q01, Q01, and samba user q01,and then, when I created the samba user Q01,I ran into a problem:
I use “smbpasswd –a Q01” to create samba user Q01, command line returned successfully, but in fact the samba user has not been created.
I can not query the user with the
2008 Nov 05
2
HVM on Dell Optiplex 755
Hi,
I want to run a HVM domU.
I have a Dell Optiplex 755:
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz
I have enabled VT in BIOS settings under performance.
However, after I boot into a linux kernel (not under Xen),
grep vmx /proc/cpuinfo returns nothing.
When I boot under Xen, I get
(XEN) Intel VT-d has been enabled
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1700: Queued Invalidation hardware not
2005 Sep 28
2
Permission denied: failed to chdir to /home/paul
Hi,
I've been trying to set up Exin and Dovecot and think I've almost gotten
there. However I'm not recieving mail to my inbox and I get messages like
the following in /var/log/exim/main.log:
2005-09-28 04:14:47 1EKZtf-0003gQ-26 <= users-return-105525-paul=
paulororke.net at openoffice.org H=s002.sfo.collab.net<http://s002.sfo.collab.net>(
openoffice.org
2012 Mar 09
3
[LLVMdev] Stack protector performance
I have a question about the performance of the implementation of the stack
protector in LLVM.
Consider the following C program:
=====
void canary()
{
char buf[20];
buf[0]++;
}
int main()
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; ++i)
canary();
return 0;
}
=====
This should definately run slower when stack protection is enabled, right?
I have measured the runtime of
2007 Mar 23
0
[LLVMdev] June 2007 LLVM Developer's Meeting
For those of you coming from out of the area and who may not be
familiar with the bay area.
TRAVEL:
The closest airport is San Jose International Airport (SJC; 10 miles
away). There is also San Francisco Internation Airport (SFO; 43 miles
away) or Oakland (OAK; 49 miles away). IMHO, I would choose SJC, then
SFO, and lastly OAK, depending upont he prices.
HOTELS:
The Cypress Hotel
2005 Jun 29
8
Hot swap CPU
From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org>
> Btw, don't quote me on this one :)
> I'm only 90% sure of the hotswapping capabilities, and less than 50%
> sure about the price :)
There _are_ systems with hot-swap CPUs, memory and/or, PCI[-X] slots.
They are _not_ commodity and pricey, and require OS-level support.
In fact, I believe Linux 2.6 has some support for
2009 Apr 17
1
CentOS 4 dkms-ndiswrapper
Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop
(latitude-e4500) for an employee.
I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf -
enclosed are the
errors messages.
The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS.
The errors prior to rebuilding the kernel are identical to the errors after
rebuilding the kernel and rebooting - minus the error
2011 Jul 30
2
[PATCH] net_connect_*(): Wait for fd to complete connect(2) when fd is non-blocking
Hi,
Dovecot ignores EINPROGRESS on connect(2) for non-blocking fd.
This is wrong. After that, read(2) to fd (or write(2) to fd) fails
with ENOTCONN if the connection of fd is not completed.
The attached patch fixes this problem.
--
-- Name: SATOH Fumiyasu (fumiyas @ osstech co jp)
-- Business Home: http://www.OSSTech.co.jp/
-- Personal Home: http://www.SFO.jp/blog/
-------------- next part
2012 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] Stack protector performance
If you compile this with optimizations, then the 'canary()' function should be totally inlined into the 'main()' function. In that case, the cost of the stack protectors will be very small compared to the loop.
-bw
On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:52 AM, Job Noorman <jobnoorman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a question about the performance of the implementation of the stack
>
2006 Aug 18
4
ZFS Filesytem Corrpution
Hi,
I have been seeing data corruption on the ZFS filesystem. Here are
some details. The machine is running s10 on X86 platform with a single
160Gb SATA disk. (root on s0 and zfs on s7)
...Sanjaya
--------- /etc/release ----------
-bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 6/06 s10x_u2wos_09a X86
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights
2005 Oct 03
2
asterisk, cisco 3640's and DIDs...
I would think I could do this but for some reason I am stymied.
I have a PRI from RCN connected to a cisco 3640 (in my day "cisco" is
all lower case :-)). My config looks something like this on the cisco...
---------------------------------------------------------
voice-card 3
dsp services dspfarm
!
ip cef
!
isdn switch-type primary-5ess
!
controller T1 3/0
framing esf
linecode
2012 May 23
2
Dovecot auth process delays exiting if LDAPS passdb used
Hi,
I'm using Dovecot 2.1.6 and LDAP server as a backend for
Postfix SMTP-Auth (SASL) on Debian GNU/Linux (wheezy),
Solaris 10 and AIX 6.1/7.1.
If Dovecot passdb is configured with LDAP (no TLS/SSL),
it is no problem. But if Dovecot passdb is configured with
LDAPS (or LDAP+TLS), Dovecot auth process has a problem
that Dovecot auth delays exiting about between 20 and
60 seconds when Dovecot
2008 Feb 01
1
Samba + BDE and slow speed on reading (long)
Hello list.
I'm new here, and I'm joining because I'm having a problem wich I can't figure out the solution myself. Here's what's happening:
A Samba 3.0.24 is serving files to seven Windows XP clients. Three of those clients run an application with a BDE database. The problem is that when running this application on Samba, it gets very, VERY slow, causing it to hang. I
2008 Mar 09
5
Recommendations for a “real RAID" 1 card on Centos box
Hi,
I'm considering setting up my Centos Desktop machine for RAID 1. I read a lot of good info at this site:http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Hardware/sata.html#intel-vitesse about differences in fakeraid and real raid cards.
The hardware I plan on installing this RAID card into is an Intel DP35DP motherboard with the Intel E4500 dual core processor, and I have two Mator 500 gig SATA hard drives.
2007 Mar 23
7
[LLVMdev] June 2007 LLVM Developer's Meeting
All,
This message contains important information about the June 2007 LLVM
Developer's Meeting. If you plan to go (or even if you don't), please
read it carefully. Nothing is set in stone yet so if you have a
suggestion, please make it! Your feedback is wanted.
Thank you to all who participated in the Conference Poll we held at the
end of last year. It let us know your preferences and
2008 Jul 03
1
Migrating from S-Plus to R - Exporting Tables
Does something like this get you close:
x <- list()
keys <- LETTERS[1:6]
# create
for (i in keys){
x[[i]] <- data.frame(a=1:5, b=1:5, c=1:5)
}
# output
output <- file('tempxx.txt', 'w')
for (i in keys){
write.table(i, row.names=FALSE, col.names=FALSE, file=output, quote=FALSE)
write.table(x[[i]], file=output, quote=FALSE)
}
close(output)
On Wed, Jul 2,
2008 Sep 04
0
Inherit Owner
Hi,
I'm having difficultly getting Inherit Owner to work. I'm running the following:
Solaris 10 (patch 6, I think)
Samba 3.2.1
Joined to AD Domain
I've been compiling Samba with:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --exec-prefix=/usr/local/samba --enable-nss-wrapper --enable-cups --with-ads --with-pam --with-acl-support --with-krb5=/usr/local --with-ldap
2005 Jul 08
1
Re: Hot swap CPU -- shared memory (1 NUMA/UPA) v. clustered (4 MCH)
From: Bruno Delbono <bruno.s.delbono at mail.ac>
> I'm really sorry to start this thread again but I found something very
> interesting I thought everyone should ^at least^ have a look at:
> http://uadmin.blogspot.com/2005/06/4-dual-xeon-vs-e4500.html
> This article takes into account a comparision of 4 dual xeon vs. e4500.
> The author (not me!) talks about "A
2013 Mar 28
2
Packages of icecast 2.4-beta?
Hi Thomas,
> My preferred approach would be to explain how to merge the debian
> packaging with a more recent tar-ball and rebuild a package out of this.
We can provide a wiki page on that, sure, although we would probably go
one step further and actually provide the packages for our target
distros too (Debian stable/testing and Ubuntu 10.04/12.04 LTS).
> a PPA approach might be
2008 Jul 02
1
randomForest training error
While trying to train randomForest with my dataset, I am ending up with the
following error
Error in randomForest.default(datatrain, classtrain) :
length of response must be the same as predictors
My data looks like:
A,B,C,D,Class
1,2,1,2,cl1
1,2,1,2,cl1
3,2,1,2,cl2
3,2,1,2,cl2
3,2,1,2,cl2
3,2,1,2,cl2
3,2,1,2,cl2
3,2,1,2,cl2
3,2,1,2,cl2
3,2,12,3,cl2
3,2,1,2,cl2
Actual dataset has around 4000