similar to: integration samba and OS/2

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul W Blackman/UC/CRCFE on 18/02/98 16:41 --------------------------- volker_borchert@teknon.de on 13/02/98 04:21:54 To: ictinus@lake.canberra.edu.au cc: (bcc: Paul W Blackman/UC/CRCFE) Subject: Samba FAQ 3.8 - stale href link Hi Paul, I recently installed Samba and promptly stumbled over the NT 4.0sp3 password problem. Of course, being mainly a

Hi. Where is th /listproc library ? There is a LOT of broken links! http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba/January1999/0294.html Best regards, Alex

Hello, people at SAMBA list. I'm going thru the same problem that Nicholas Williams has described in samba-list first (see references below), and I'm implementing the solution you've decribed in the list (SO_KEEPALIVE, etc). But I'm stuck with the script issue, as I run RedHat Linux 6.0 which doesn't use ksh but pdksh instead. The ksh script doesn't run in pdksh

For those of you that have had/are having problems getting Win 98 clients to correctly authenticate, I have identified a stumbling block which I had to deal with. Specifically, EnablePlainTextPassword *must* be a DWORD value. In following the instructions found here, http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba/October1998/0321.html and on the Microtheft web site, I installed the ptxt_on.inf file from the

Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > Current aside, the February2000 was last modified on February, 2nd. Last > message there is http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba/February2000/0042.html > The same is true for samba-technical, samba-cvs (did not check others) > Or is it a problem of my proxy? I don't think so, I see the same thing. Samba web-folks, could you check this out, please?

Hi, I would be *VERY* interested in a reversed pwget (see http://www.martnet.com/~johnny/exploits/microsoft/NT/WinNT.passwordhashes.deobfuscation.html) to be able to automaticaly set first-time NT passwords ('smbpasswd -r' will only work if you first enter the 'previous' password) on our PDC (evt. remote from UNIX through some tcp (ssh?) connection). Bjart Kvarme seems to have

Howdy folks: Please (I beg you, please!) don't follow the examples of a couple of recent posters. This is very bad form. If you want to get off the list, please don't send send a message to the list begging other readers to help (they can't). Only you can help stamp out forest fires (or get yourself off this list). At the top of every message from the list is a URL that can

David Collier-Brown wrote: > I wonder if Daniel S. Riley hit the nail on the head... > > For high-rate TCP transfers, back to back packets with interface cards > > that are close to the minimum interpacket gap, you actually expect 50% > > collisions from the TCP acks colliding with data packets. This limits > > the transfer rate to about 700 - 800 KB/sec; with

Proposal: There should be a way to specify that some substitutions should be made in a way that is safe as far as Bourne Shell command lines are concerned (e.g., if %f expands to a string with special characters in it, it should be expanded to a sutiably quoted string in 'print command' parameters). Either all parameters that eventually result in a /bin/sh command line

I am experiencing a problem with all time stamps having the same date and time stamp. I found this bug report http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba/June1998/0239.html and see there is a fix. The question I have is has this issue been resolved in later versions of Samba code. It would be easier to upgrade than deal with a code change and re compilation. Scott Ranzal -------------- next part

hi, do somebody tell me, where i could find information about samba restrictions compared with Windows Server. I' m trying to write a small paper for school, which describe a comarison between samba and Windows Server. I heard for example, that 1-Samba is not adapted for great nets? 2-Samba has not a "system management server" like windows? 3-Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) has been

Hi all! Do anybody has a full working environment using externip on an asterisk box behind a nat? I tried with two diferent boxes (Elastix-1.4.24 e Trixbox-1.4.22-3)and the asterisk do not replace neither contact, neither sdp headers info with the externip informed on sip.conf general parameters. I used these two statements: externip=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX localnet=192.168.200.0/255.255.255.0 Do

Hi, My name is Katie and I was wondering if you could help me with my problem. I am trying to write a function in R that computes the statistics (mean, standard error, confidence intervals) for stratified samples. I am not that familiar with R and I am having dificulties setting this function up. Any help or tips on where/how to do this? Best, Katie [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 12/28/18 2:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Currently we use non-cryptographically secure random numbers in two > places, the error filter (to inject errors at random) and the random > plugin. For this we have used either random_r or a home-brew-ish > Linear Congruential Generator. Use of random_r is problematic on BSDs > because it doesn't exist there. Use of the LCG is

I appologise sincerly, will not happen again. mr. Ripley: Your suggestions were helpful, thanks. I figured I haven not installed the devel RPMS. >From: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> >To: listproc at baylor.edu >CC: grass-request at baylor.edu, Miha STAUT <mihastaut at hotmail.com> >Subject: Re: list GRASSLIST: List Message Rejected >Date: Thu, 15 May

Hi there noticed a strange thing in asterisk 1.6.2x 1.6.1x after one of the clients sends bye asterisk first sends invite to other side then after 200 ok it sends bye I am not sure but that could be some missconfiguration issue or a bug? so it's like this: side A sends bye to asterisk, asterisk responds with 200 OK to side A, then it sends INVITE to side B, expects 200 OK

Hi, I dont know if this a coding rule or a program bug. When I write this function below it work: a <- c(1,2) for(i in a){ print(i) } [1] 1 [1] 2 But if I write this function with line space it dont work. a <- c(1,2) for(i in a){ print(i) } Error: unexpected '}' in "}" I remember that in early R version this limitation dont exist. This is a bus, a rule or a

My systems: rh61, 2.2.14 + smbfs-nls.patch. === 1) Samba seems to override unix permissions in a particular case. I get the very same behavior of: http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-technical/February2000/0476.html === 2) browsing behavior: anonymous login There is a different behavior doing smbclient -L -U% if the server is samba or nt/w2k nt wants a correct user/pass pair if guest account

I observe dificulties with using data.frame(I(matrix)) > mat <- matrix(letters, 2, 2) > dimnames(mat) <- list(c(1:2), c("x","y")) > mat x y 1 "a" "c" 2 "b" "d" > dd <- data.frame(I(mat)) > ddd I.mat..x I.mat..y 1 a a 2 b b 3 c c doesn't look too bad, but, has

We still have quite a few patches pending in samba-bugs. If you have sent a patch to samba-bugs and are waiting for it to be integrated then you might like to know about two things that make life easier for you and for us. The first is the samba-cvs list. This is a standard listproc list (just like this one) that automatically receives all the cvs commit messages. Be warned that this list is