similar to: /etc/smbusers

samba@samba.org Giulio Orsero <giulioo@pobox.com> Mike Quin <m.r.quin@stir.ac.uk> Matthew Halliday <matthewh@fesa.co.uk> Carsten =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Nordstr=3DF8m?=3D Jensen <north@get2net.= "Carlos Vinueza M." <carlos@ecuadorexplorer.com> Eric Dahnke <edahnke@istreetlabs.com> Giulio Orsero <giulioo@pobox.com> Giulio Orsero

V??en? z?kazn?ku, tak jak st?rneme, kles? na?e pohlavn? potence. N?? organizmus produkuje m?n? testosteronu, co? je v?znamn? hormon mu??, a proto je i na?e touha men?? a v?kon slab??. Pro mnoho mu?? to znamen? v??n? pohlavn? probl?my - slab? nebo neexistuj?c? stopo?en?, ztr?ta mu?nosti nebo schopnosti uspokojen?. Jsou to trapn?, poni?uj?c? v?ci. Samoz?ejm? na to existuj? l?ky na l?ka?sk? p?edpis,

Hi, my situation is: incoming call goes into the queue and is picked up by callback agent. The agent then wants to transfer the call to another device (another SIP phone). But 'transfer' button doesn't work and '#' button attempts to start channel monitor. Tried with both Queue(testq) and Queue(testq,tT). Is it meant as a feature that agents won't transfer calls at

Hi, I have '#' key mapped to attended transfer in features.conf, but when the call is answered by queue agent, following message appears on CLI after pressing the '#' key: ERROR[15062]: chan_agent.c:330 __agent_start_monitoring: Recording already started on that call. I've not found any option in agents.conf or queues.conf that enables/disables this feature. Any ideas?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Currently some of our organizational roles uses shared secrets (aka the password) to access the mail account of an organizational role, say "sales" for example. For one, I don't like shared secrets, for second, there had been some changes to shared mailboxes, I can only say "user sales has deleted the message at then and

Everyone, I have finally resolved the new heartburn 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty was giving me and have stumbled upon some information that might help others out there. I was seeing problems with ACL entries getting mangled and disappearing, Excel making files read only and extended attributes doing bizarre things. The solution revolved around what appears to be a change in how ACLs are managed.

Hello, I tried to configure a very simple case of Asterisk using SIP userA --- Asterisk server ---- userB sip.conf [userA] type=friend username=userA host=dynamic nat=no context=test [userB] type=friend username=userB host=dynamic nat=no context=test In extensions.conf [test] exten => 1000,1,Dial(SIP/userA) exten => 2000,1,Dial(SIP/userB) I make a call from userA to userB, it works,

In dovecot 1.2.10 I run into the following problem: Our users are entitled to share their personal mailboxes. This works. But if user A shares any of its mailboxes with user B, then dovecot always reports the INBOX of user A as subscribed by user B. No matter whether user B really subscribed the INBOX of A, or whether user A permitted user B the access to its INBOX. The problem is caused

Hey List- running samba 3.0.23b I have an issue with a single member of a group not being able to get write access to a share that all the other members have access to. I have checked the file permissions and they look good to me. Any thoughts on where to look or solve this? Below is some info. share portion of smb.cnf: [ecwtest] path = /data/www/webroot writeable = yes create mode = 6775

Hello, I have a Dovecot Installation Version 2.2.14 on CentOS 6.5 with shared folder. UserA shares his INBOX to user UserB. I activated "per user \Seen flags" with location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=%h/shared/%%u:CONTROL=%h/shared/%%u:INDEXPVT=%h/shared I think the INDEXPVT setting activates this setting, right? I activated this setting when there were already several accounts in

On 10/25/2017 12:58 PM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > We could create new "role" users, share the password and create an > additional account within the mail client (thunderbird) they use. From > users perspective it is exactly what they want. But I dislike the idea > of sharing the password. For what reason exactly? It not being personalized, too easy to leak, potentially

Hi, I tried upgrading from my Samba 3 setup to Samba 4.1.6 - I do not need all those AD-Features, I just need to mount the shares on two Windows 7 systems. Nothing more or less - this is the only feature I need. I use the same configuration that I used with Samba 3 (testparm says it is fine). The simple question is - why do I reach transfer rates of ~110MB/Sec with Samba 3 and only ~45 MB/Sec

Hello, I have discovered a slight problem with MS-Project4 on a WinDD server, where users are not able to update the *.MPP file. We have all data files stored on a UNIX box, using samba-2.05a, on an RS6000 running AIX 4.2.1, so all *.MPP files are stored there, with the proper UNIX user's userid and permissions. The problem is that userB can not update and save changes in a file that userA

Hi All, Is it possible for different users to sync their home directory's (which reside on the same server) using rsync. By that I mean that usera will using rsync to sync /home/usera and userb will sync /home/userb on the same server but usera will not have access to /home/userb. I hope I am making sense. I do not want to use ssh, just rsync. I have RTFMs but they did not answer my question.

Hi, I have dovecot configured to make use of the dict (mysql) plugin in order to keep track of the used quota. First, as you can see in the mysql table output below it seems that values aren't stored correctly. Secondly I get all kinds of database related errors in my mail logs. The (relevant) sections of the configuration files are also included below. My question is, what am I doing wrong?

Hello, I have discovered a slight problem with MS-Project4 on a WinDD server, where users are not able to update the *.MPP file. WinDD is Citrix Metaframe on Windows NT 3.51. We have all data files stored on a UNIX box, using samba-2.05a, so all *.MPP files are stored there, with the proper UNIX user's userid and permissions. The problem is that userB can not update and save changes in a

Hi, I have a problem with the removal of inheritance ACLs of subdirectories. It almost sounds like only adding ACLs work but removals of inheritance ACL's not. By default the access rights (including ACLs) should be inherited, but it should also be possible to remove the access rights from any subdirectory. This is what I am trying to do, I have a share called media with some users /

Hello guys, I have an issue with shared folders: 1) The USERA shares his INBOX with USERB 2) USERB subscribes the USERA share without problems. 3) USERA deletes all his / or some directories from his INBOX (Trash, Drafts and Sent) 4) USERA logouts and makes login, so dovecot recreates the folders. 5) USERB gains access to subscrive those folders (Trash, Drafts and Sent) this is my namespace

Hi, I'm making some tests with Tellfree brazilian provider. I'm using 2 users A and B, one for calling and the other to receive calls. When I make a call I can see (from the CLI console) user A is calling user B but user B does not answer (the phone continues to ring) even if the "sip show registry" command says user B is registered. In my sip.conf I have: register =>

Greetings, i am testing: - dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.11 - dovecot 1.2.3 - dovecot-1.2-managesieve-0.11.8 (with patch) I am trying to use sieve_after to execute some redirection of mails. I have put in the after script: require "include"; require "fileinto"; if header :contains ["To","Cc"] "userA at acasalud.com.ar" { keep; redirect