similar to: help please anybody - [ homes ] problem

I have Backgroundrb working with a Rails project on my OS X box at work, but when I attempt to run migrations or tests at home on my windows box, it fails stating: UNIXServer required! If I remove Backgroundrb from the plugins directory, things work on Windows so I know this is somehow related to Backgroundrb. Does anyone have a tip on what might be going on? Thanks, Nathan -------------- next

I have a SAMBA Server utilizing an LDAP backend for user authentication and it works great unless I use ClearCase. When ClearCase is used the compilation time for our code is slowed down to a crawl and the ClearCase application is rendered nearly useless. As a test fix my boss wants me to create a second SAMBA server to be used for only the ClearCase server. I don't know if this will work,

One of the benefits of living in Silicon Valley is the SVLUG Linux users group. You meet the most interesting people there :-). I met someone from Rational software who has the ability to contact the product manager for Clearcase. I told him about the number of Clearcase customers who would like Rational to support Clearcase running against a Samba fileserver (as they've asked the Samba Team

Hello there- I hope you do not mind this email, as I am trying to reach a talented ClearCase professional. I am a business development manager for a technical consulting form called ettain group, and hope you will peruse the description below. In the event that Jacksonville is not a market of interest to you, please feel free to make any suggestions of how I can locate talented ClearCase

We are having some problems in our company's test group that did not exist when our Clearcase 2003.06 server existed on a Solaris 8 machine. Now we are running on RHEL 5.2 with Clearcase 7.0.1.3 with Samba 3.0.28 (despite the fact that IBM has only blessed up to 3.0.24) and running into some file locking issues with some scripts our test group runs. I am hoping that someone might have some

Hi all -- I recently temporarily deployed an upgraded Clearcase server (7.1.2.3) on 64 bit RHEL 5.6. With it I was using Redhat's release of Samba for that version of the OS -- 3.0.33. The system has 32 GB of memory and within 12 hours, it would be down into swap. Maximum active licenses used is 36 but a more typical load is 18-25 users having a Clearcase license at once. Clearcase

This falls under the 'getting clearcase to work with samba' category. Does anybody know if the clearcase albd server actually uses samba to access files (or anything else) on the unix side? I am having 'discussions' with rational (the clearcase people). The nt user running clearcase to access some unix-side views connects to the unix side using a set of credentials that have

Hi - I'm getting timouts trying to access us1.samba.org or I'd look through the archives first. Anyone currently supporting any versions of Rational's ClearCase/samba/UNIX/NT? We are currently running samba v2.0.3 on both HP-UX 11.0 (vob server) and Solaris 2.5.1 (view server). Rational ClearCase v3.2.1 on the two UNIX and NT Workstation 4 (some SP3, some SP4) We currently support

FYI:, I'm fairly new to samba (a couple of months now), and have experimented - unsuccessfully - with getting it to work with clearcase. Does anyone have a how-to, or a list of gotcha's for setting up clearcase with samba? Thanks in advance for any information you can send me. Ozzie,

Andrew, Thank you for your suggestions. The real problem is Rational Technical support. When you pay someone 100k+ they tend to look for any excuse to deem you "unsupported". If you don't have your default group set to the clearcase user group, then technical support will decide that thats where your problem is! I am sure you know how that goes... I have solved problems

Gerald, No worries. This patch is required if your using Rational ClearCase and you don't want everyone to have access to it. It's to fix a brokenness (IMO) within ClearCase, and maybe other programs. Our windows primary group has 10k+ users... I will shoot it off to Rational, so they can provide it to there customers. I was hoping it could be applied to the main tree so I could just

I'm hoping this turns into another case of 'knowing it works makes it happen.' I am involved with a unix clearcase installation which now needs to work with nt. We have clearcase 3.2.1 running on both the unix and nt side. Because we have checkin/checkout triggers hooked to some unix-side stuff, we need the unix views to be accessible from nt. Does anyone have direct experience

Hello, i have a little problem here: Using Samba 2.2.2 with IBM ClearCase (2003) on a Sun Solaris 8 machine (2 cpus, 4G ram) (IBM does not support Samba 3.0 with Clearcase, maybe Samba 3.0 will fix the problem, but not able to test it yet). There are more than 100 smbd processes running in average. Load average of the maschine: under 1.0 in normal operation. But from time to time there are

Hello Samba, We tried to use samba-2.2.4-1 with Rational ClearCase and had a problem using WinBind. ClearCase requires the primary group id to be set to the clearcase users group. WinBind sets the primary group to something like DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS. I am including the patch we made to samba-2.2.4 to get things working. I have added two new smb.conf options: winbind primary group //

I installed Samba recently on a ClearCase server (Solaris 8) to remove the need for DiskAccess on the Windows clients. I'm having two problems with it, actually. The important one that I'm asking the list about is that Samba is hammering my NIS master with requests for DoMaiN+UseR (and every conceivable combination of cases--note + instead of \, per winbind separator statement in

Hi, folks: One of my developers brought a SAMBA/ClearCase permissions issue to my attention for which I have no visibility. Perhaps someone has run across this before, and could enlighten us? We are using ClearCase 5 on SunFire 880 vob servers, SAMBA 2.2. Developer creates file in unix vob, using unix view, from unix machine, testfile_unix_text Developer creates file in unix vob, using unix

Hi Can somebody help me concerning this problm with samba. I am using samba 2.0.7 to link clearcase DB files on server UNIX with NT clearcase clients. We have upgraded clients from winNT4.0 to win2000 . Now we have many trouble like : PC stuck performance very slow file not found ( it exists!) etc... I saw in the samba log file of users the message as follow: cbc0794634 (137.x.x.x) connect to

All, We've been testing to determine why SAMBA access to UNIX clearcase VOBs became slow when we upgraded from 2.2.8a to 3.0.14 (and now 3.0.24). I cannot say we've found 'anything new' but we have found the following behavior. Any help understanding why a WinXP and Win2K client would need the shares to VOB storage mapped to speed processing would be appreciated (note that it

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Need help in samba configuration Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500 From: Brian Cowan <brcowan at gmail.com> To: Pankaj.C.Pimple at relianceada.com References: <OF3AAD32AD.86A5D538-ON65257671.002808E6-65257671.002851F0 at relianceada.com> If your Samba server is a fully operational domain member server, then the

I am experiencing a reproducible crash from the following statement: plot(density(rnorm(1000))) on R 1.5.1 on Windows 2000. This is a dual-processor machine with 512Mb of RAM. Please advise if further details of hardware/OS are needed. If rgui.exe is in use, the crash occurs before the plot can be displayed. If rterm.exe is in use, the plot appears, then the error (and crash). A screen