similar to: Problem in Win95/98 Find Computer

Dear sir: There was one problem which bothered me for a long time. I used the Red Hat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36 (gcc 2.7.2.3) and samba-2.0.3, samba-2.0.5a for a period of time. The Linux was treated as the Samba server. All of the file/printer sharing from the Linux samba server to the MS-Windows 95/98/NT clients are OK. It only got problems in the Windows 2000 (since Beta3, now RC2) as the

Hello All, I have a SCO unix server running smbclient 2.0.3 and I have set it up so that it has print queues and can print to win95 and win nt 4 machines successfully. The win95 machines I can print to with share level security and the win nt machines i can print to using doman usernames and password without anyproblems. However I am trying to print to a win95 machine with user level security.

I've been having some trouble loggin on to the home share on my Win95 boxes. I've checked the archive, and I've seen this posted before, but no solution posted. My smb.conf maps home directories correctly with NT logons, but not with Win95 PCs. It maps the profiles directory instead of the home directory. If someone could take a quick look at my smb.conf and let me know what I hosed

Thanks Quentin. I'm trying to examine from the operands of the return instruction, and then to get the last assignment of those. I thought use_iterator/reg_iterator may suit better than just loop through the machine basicblock in the reverse order. Cheng-Chih On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Cheng-Chih, > > On Sep 25,

On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. >> This >> means that if you have MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 and Pass2 uses MemDep

Chris Lattner schrieb: > On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: >>> This isn't really possible. The issue is that MemDep doesn't just >>> "analyze your function". It is designed to be as lazy as possible, >>> which means that it only does analysis when a query is performed. This >>> means that if you have

On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:55 AM, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following > assertion: > > test: > /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h: > 226: > AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, > llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion

Hi, I am trying to write an LLVM project, using LLVM 2.9. My passes are defined as follows, where the Pass2 requires Pass1. namespace llvm { class BaseClass : public ModulePass { // Name for printing const char* printname; protected: BaseClass(char id, const char* name) : ModulePass(id),printname(name){ } }; class Pass1 : public BaseClass { public: static char ID; Pass1() :

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Marc Brünink<marc at bruenink.de> wrote: >>> actually my problem is easier. So I still have hope that it is possible: >>> >>> MemDep->Pass1->Pass2 >>> >>> Pass1 uses MemDep. Pass2 only uses Pass1. Eventually, Pass2 changes the >>> code. Unfortunately, non-local dependencies of MemDep might point to

Chris Lattner schrieb: > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass >> requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary analyses. >> This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. >> >> The problem is, that I would like

Suppose, I have a Pass1 implemented as a subclass of Pass, with source code in the directory of llvm source base( transform/analyze ) I can run that pass through opt on the bytecode emitted by gcc frontend through opt tool. However, I want that Pass1 to be the part of the actual GCC compiler. I want to know how I can position Pass1 among other passes /optimizations/ code generations. e.g if

I am having problems passing analysis results to transformation passes, so I reduced my testcase into the following bare bone: Pass1: simple FunctionPass, counting functions Pass2: transformation pass, for now, just trying to obtain a reference of Pass1 using AU.getAnalysis<Pass1>() inside its runOnFunction(). When I run it, I get the following runtime error: opt -load

Hi David, Thank you for your reply. In fact, my question originally came from the google native client. I thought that the bitcode can be shared among the different targets as it inherently is. Therefore, I used the clang to generate the bitcode to prove that my thought is right, and I supposed that the different bitcode caused from the different versions of libraries before. Thanks for the

Hello all, I have written one pass to collect information about specific calls in an llvm IR file and am not trying to reference the results from the first pass in a second pass. What is the correct way to reference an additional custom pass in LLVM? At the moment the project is set up under the lib/Transforms directory in source and has the current layout: Thresholds/ include/

Devang Patel wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:01 PM, John Criswell wrote: > >> Devang Patel wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Devang Patel, >>>> >>>> In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to >>>> requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by

Just curious, has anyone gotten Samba to work with Windows 2000? I've mucked with it a bit. But can't seem to make it go. I haven't tried applying the NT 4.0 Registry patches yet I will probably take a look at them and see if I can get them working with Win2000. Thanks! -- Steve "We confuse you, or your money back!"

Hi Óscar, Thank you for your reply. It looks like the limitations are the platform's API and ABI (included the size of variable). So, if there are two platforms that have the same API, ABI but different ISAs, the bitcode can be shared. Can I say that? Thanks, Kenia Kuo 2012/9/25 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Kenia Kuo <kenkillerkuo at gmail.com> writes: > >

A summary of my problem, I had wrong UIDs for a user (eg pmal) between the /etc/passwd file and the smbpasswd file. When I was trying to loggin from a couple of machines running either win nt or win 98 I was reading in the log files that the loggin could not be completed because the UID were wrong but there were instances were I could loggin from another computer with the same username. I really

On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Marc Brünink wrote: > Hi, > > I do have a FunctionPass that does change the code. This FunctionPass > requires another FunctionPass which performs all the necessary > analyses. > This AnalysisPass again requires MemoryDependenceAnalysis. > > The problem is, that I would like MemoryDependenceAnalysis to run on > the > unaltered

On 6/25/12 8:55 PM, Thomson wrote: > Thanks, John. > > This sounds reasonable that the analysis group just provides an > interface to its implementors (pass). Then I have another question, is > it allowed to specify multiple pass in the same analysis group in the > command line for opt? Yes, you can do that. Using multiple analysis passes that belong to the same group may