similar to: Delay when using ipc share

MM = M Maki (1 Oct 2002) AB = Andrew Bartlett (2 Oct 2002) MM > I have a couple of Samba (2.0.7 & 2.2.0) servers I scanned with > Nessus and they reported a security hole of "Possible to login > to the remote host using a NULL session" I have a couple of NT > servers I disabled with a registry edit. Is there a way to > prevent this on the Samba

>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:14:44 -0400 (EDT) >> schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote: >> >>>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) >>>> Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. >>>>> In the logs for a few client machines I

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:14:44 -0400 (EDT) > schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) > > > Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. > > > > In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: >

Hi, Is it possible to make only the IPC$ guest ok so that you don't have to have to specify a password? In other words, I'd like 'map to guest'=bad user for all shares *except* IPC$, but to allow any user to browse the share list (ie: map to guest=bad password" for IPC$ only) Thanks.

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:14:32 -0400 (EDT) > Thomas Schulz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. > > In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: > > > > [2016/09/29 22:36:58.862575, 0] > > ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4402(widelinks_warning) > > Share 'IPC$'

We are running Samba 4.4.6 as a file server. In the logs for a few client machines I see entries such as: [2016/09/29 22:36:58.862575, 0] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4402(widelinks_warning) Share 'IPC$' has wide links and unix extensions enabled. These parameters are incompatible. Wide links will be disabled for this share. I assume that Share 'IPC$' is some sort of

Can anyone help on this matter in changing samba password: [d8tsjb0@as87500580 ~]$ smbpasswd Old SMB password: New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. Receiving SMB: Server stopped responding machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the tconX on the IPC$ share. Error was : Read error: Connection reset by peer. Failed

Probably an easy one for most of you: I'm trying to create nested groups on my Samba server. When running "net rpc group add" I am prompted for my root password and receive the error: "Failed to connect to IPC$ share on localhost". When I use my other login I receive: # net rpc group add Admins -L -U bill Enter bill's password: Failed to add alias 'Admins'

Thanks, I recompiled following your instructions and it is now working. Thanks very much I forward to samba ML, so it could be a clue for people having same problem !!!! On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Barlow, Graham K wrote: > Add the option below to your FLAGS1= line in the compile options and > 'make clean;make' . > > -DGUEST_SESSSETUP=2 > > This allows people without a

Hello, I have the following entries in /boot/loader.conf: kern.ipc.shm_use_phys="1" kern.ipc.semmns="500" kern.ipc.semmni="40" kern.ipc.semmap="500" which are set correctly. Unfortunately, the following two entries kern.ipc.shmmax="512000000" kern.ipc.shmall="65526" do not change the corresponding values according to

I'm running the latest samba release (2.2.8a), and everything seems to be running fine. Except for something that does not look quite right. Connections to the IPC$ share are being left behind by samba once the user has logged off. And what's even more troubling is that the pid associated with the lingering IPC$ connection is picked up by the next smbd process, and then you have one pid

yesterday i saked for help because : - I set a valid guest account (suid to it permit me to use printer) - I defined a printer share publicly accessible - my server is in secutity = user and I need to stay it like that when trying to access to the server from an account not existing on the Unix part, Samba asks for a password for IPC$ what is wrong in my configuration? [global] ... printing

Hopefully someone can put my mind at ease... I have about 10 W2K boxes with account lockout threshold of 5 failed logins and Additional Restrictions for Anonymous Connections set to 'No access w/o explicit anon. permissions' (Administrative Tools -> Security Settings -> Local Policies -> Security Options) I've set up a Samba server this week and in the past few days

hello I am running Samba 2.2.8 (latest) that I downloaded the binary from the Samba site. I have this problem in older versions of Samba as well. I have under Redhat 8.0 security level = user works fine under NT/2000/XP platforms, but when I try to login from a Windows 95/98/98se/Me machine, samba prompts me for a password to resource \\netbiosname\IPC$ how do I prevent this from happening in

Back to this problem Here a proof of it: 1. smbd version 3.0.11 started yaberge2@sda6 ==> p smbd root 13820 20662 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf root 20662 1 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf yaberge2@sda6 ==> /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus Samba version 3.0.11

Does this look right? The places to look are wait and wait_for_multiple (which I modified to take the class as an argument, so that I could yield). Dan /**************************************************************************** * ipc.c - source for the win32-ipc package ****************************************************************************/ #include "ruby.h" #include

I am running Linux Kernel 2.2.18 which is upgraded from from RedHat 6.2 kernel 2.2.14 using standard kernel patches from kernel.org. I am running Samba 2.0.7 from RedHAT 6.2 upgrade/addendums. When I get more then one connection smbd will die and log.smb will read this - [2001/03/23 06:12:19, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(667) - Can't create or use IPC area. Error was File exists

Either I''ve been up too late, or the timeout value passed to Ipc.new isn''t actually saved anywhere. Am I wrong? Anyway, I''ve added docs and a test suite for win32-ipc. Feel free to take a look and make sure there aren''t any glaring errors. Thanks. Dan PS - I''m hoping to release win32-event 0.2.0 and win32-ipc 0.1.0 this weekend unless there are

Hi, Dovecot complains at start for the ipc listener not correctly configured. What is the configuration scheme ? Thanks JM

Hello: We have got 2 directors and three backend mailbox servers. I get the following error " Error: connect(ipc-proxy) failed: Permission denied". I have read the article https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-August/137349.html and we have done as signaled in the two director servers with no success, So, we have tried now to set it like this: service ipc {