similar to: ERROR! Out of connection structures

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches similar to: "ERROR! Out of connection structures"

2000 Feb 15
0
samba 2.0.6 breaks domain validation (for me)
Hi, Recently i moved from samba 2.0.5a to Samba 2.0.6 on 4 machines. Samba 2.0.5a ran quite smooth except for oplocking problems, so i decided to upgrade. I compiled both releases myself and used the same ./configure options both times (but i compiled on different machines: v 2.0.5a was compiled on a HP 9000/715/50, 2.0.6 was compiled on a HP 9000/800/K360) I used binutils 2.9.1 and gcc 2.8.1 on
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1 localhost
1999 Dec 18
1
MultipleUsersOnConnection, WTSE
There is a new regedit file in Samba 2.0.6 for Windows Terminal Server Edition that sets a MultipleUsersOnConnection value to 1. I can't find any documentation about this regedit in the source package or using a search of the Samba website. In Micro$oft's knowledgebase articles Q190162, Q233082, Q231798 and Q191370, it would appear that the value should be set to 0 rather than 1 for the
2001 Dec 19
2
Out of connections: here too
Hi samba fans, We run samba on Solaris SunOS 5.8, samba 2.2.2 and are plagued by failing connections for a while. We have about 150 people at max usage connecting simultaneous to 1 samba server, mostly from within Win NT Terminal Server Sessions (this might be related, as these sessions occur from only from four different IP's namely our four TS servers) Symptom: user cannot mount one
2003 Apr 18
0
[Fwd: Xinetd 2.3.10 Memory Leaks]
I just submitted a PR for this (haven't even gotten the confirmation email), but since not everyone tracks the GNATS CVS distribution, I figured that I'd send it here as well. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: Steve Grubb <linux_4ever@yahoo.com> > To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com > Subject: Xinetd 2.3.10 Memory Leaks > Date: 18 Apr 2003 16:18:36 +0000 > > >
2001 Nov 19
1
Win2k terminal server and "MultipleUsersOnConnection"
On NT4 terminal server it is possible to change a registry setting to make it create one connection to samba per user .... I know there has been a lot of discussion around this but I can't find a definative answer in any of the posts: How do you do this with 2000? The fact that it only runs one smb process is causing serious problems on my samba server. Anybody? Andre -------------- next
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface. This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd
2000 May 10
0
patche for samba-2.0.7/source/smbd/conn.c
Dear all, I have made patch for samba-2.0.7/source/smbd/conn.c This will, instead of using by-directional link, use array for managing connections. # The patch does seems to work on my RHL6.1Ja(fixed) version of # Linux machine. I don't know about other OS/Architecture. This should work better then original because: 1) The original code used bitmap.c for looking empty area. But using
2001 Nov 13
2
NT terminal server
I'm running a NT4.0 Terminal Server with 50+ peopleon it. All the users' home directories / data etc. is located on a samba server (2.2.1a) on a RedHat7.1 box. All the users on the server are shown in samba under the same connection as they're all on the same machine... this means samba only runs one copy of smb for all these users. Everything seems to be working / set up fine but
2011 Nov 08
2
match first consecutive list of capitalized words in string
Dear R-Helpers, this is my first post ever to a mailing list, so please feel free to point out any missunderstandings on my side regarding the conventions of this mailing list. My problem: Assuming the following character vector is given: names <- c("filia Maria", "vidua Joh Dirck Kleve (oo 02.02.1732)", "Bernardus Engelb Franciscus Linde j.u.Doktor referendarius
2008 Aug 19
1
[Bug 17204] New: Support Netbeans.tv player
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17204 Summary: Support Netbeans.tv player Product: swfdec Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://netbeans.tv/community/NetBeans-IDE-6.5-Beta-Java- Debugger-New-Feature-376/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:
2005 Dec 05
1
Strange automount problem with samba & LDAP
Hi all, I've installed samba-3.0.21rc2 on a solaris 10 machine (latest patches applied) by compiling from source: #uname -a SunOS newton 5.10 Generic_118844-20 i86pc i386 i86pc User's home is mounted using automount without any problem. But when I try to mount using samba, it can not access the users home directory when it 's share is not mounted and gives following error:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
<<<<<<<<<<<<< I connect my homedir from the testserver and start Lotus Notes. Lotus Notes is infamous for it's sensitivity for 'non-optimal' network connections. Notes tries to lock certain files and complains immediately if that fails. > 3. does the log message always fail at the same offset/count: > (fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
remove unix password sync = yes Reply on a question.... http://www.mail-archive.com/redhat-devel-list@redhat.com/msg04223.html Good Luck, Ries Return-Path: <ries@franksintl.nl> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6771C4AC8 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 17
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
and that access to the client should be denied. > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client? > > > > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by