similar to: Changing password from Win98 doesn't work with plain text passwords enabled

On 2018-06-15, rj coleman <rjcdevelop at gmail.com> wrote: > Am I the only one who just received this email from this group? Which came with my password in the email in plain text? This is a standard feature of GNU Mailman. You can disable the monthly password reminder in your user preferences (which is the same place you can change your password, if you are concerned that it was

WRT mailing the password in clear text .. how else would it mail it? Mailman does not store any kind of encryption keys for email, and frankly, most people don't know how to use encrypted email. This list probably has a (much) higher percentage of people who would know how to use encrypted mail (ie, Linux users .. who are more computer literate than the average person). But, I don't

Ah I see. That said, this email wasn't a password reminder. It was a "your membership has been disabled" email. On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Keith Keller < kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2018-06-15, rj coleman <rjcdevelop at gmail.com> wrote: > > Am I the only one who just received this email from this group? Which > came with my

Hello, this is my first post so hi to everyone! Situation: server: sun netra t1, solaris 8, running samba 2.2.8. ip address 10.10.10.220/24 client: windows 98 pc, 192.168.0.55, with samba server info in lmhosts file and a wins server that reads the samba info. problem: when i try to access resources on the samba server, i get an error, (can not find the server) so i started sniffing the

Am I the only one who just received this email from this group? Which came with my password in the email in plain text? Begin forwarded message: > From: centos-request at centos.org > Date: June 15, 2018 at 12:31:04 PM EDT > To: rjcdevelop at gmail.com > Subject: confirm a8e9e592b9d81e13e569ffa9f6f4267c3f2a8fe8 > > Your membership in the mailing list CentOS has been disabled

We're getting very close now to having our RH6.1 server as we want it. Just a few anoying things left to iron out so we can trial it properly prior to going live. One of them is the "veto files" option in smb.conf. We want to stop users on Win95 clients from seeing (or deleting) the dot-files in their home shares. I've tried the above option, I've tried "hide dot

Hi there everyone! I'm using Samba 2.0.5a-19990721 on a RedHat 6.0 machine with Linux kernel 2.2.12. My system generally works fine, however recently I've had some complaints about some files being corrupted. The latest and best-handled to enable a debugging happened at around the same time. Both clients were using Windows95 OSR2 machines with Excel 97 SP-2. Two users reported the problem

Hello, I had samba working fine with RH6.0 but now I cannot get it to work... I cannot even see the SAMBA machine in my network neighbor hood. TCP/IP connectivity is fine... Has something changed in this version?? Why does the smb.conf now have 'server string' instead of 'netbios name'??? I have attached smb.conf and smb thanks Ken -------------- next part --------------

Hi, I'm looking for some help to migrate from plain text to encrypted passwords. I'm using smbpasswd for authentication on a FreeBSD 4.9 server with samba 2.2.8. When we set up our server, we had Win95 clients with plain text passwords. As we introduced Win98 clients, we just kept with the plain text passwords. Now we are looking at XP clients and enctrypted passwords. My understanding

Hello, I have this big problem which bothers me for past week(s). I have setup a simple samba network on win95 only net and it worked fine. This time I try to setup a samba on a network having win98 WinNT 4.0 sp4 and WinNT4.0 WS SP 5. I believe all machines are on the same local net. I have tried both samba 2.0.5a (RH6.1 default) as well as samba 2.0.7. I can use 'smbclient'

I can think of several potential differences. ?You may miss any bridge specific traffic (STP, LLDP) using the interfaces generated by the bridge itself. If you have vlan tagged sub interfaces you might also miss that traffic if you were snooping a particular interface. Obviously you will miss any on-wire broadcast traffic specific to the layer1 connection a particular interface was connected to

Howdy all: I'm trying to use smbmount to mount a win9x share and copy some files for backup, eventually to run as a script invoked via cron. I have RH6.1/samba 2.0.5a, and the windoze box is win95b. If I do the standard mount (smbmount //winbox/backup /mnt/smb04) I have to be root. Also, after it's mounted, I can't create any files there as a normal user (even though the

Hello ! I'm having serious problems with Samba's writing speed (both 2.0.5a from RH 6.1 and 2.0.6 compiled from sources) on a 100Mbit network. If I write a file with block size 65487 or less, then the writing speed is about 7-8 MB/s - a very nice value, my bow to the Samba team :) If I change the block size to 65488 or more, then the writing speed falls down to 3 MB/s, which is not what

Does the same fix for windows 95 fix windows 98? Does anyone know for sure -------------------------------------------- You can tune a piano but you can't tuna fish - REO Speedwagon

Hi! I've installed RedHat 6.1 on a Pentium 233. I'm using samba 2.0.5a which came with RH6.1. On another PC (Pentiun-II 400) I've installed Windows NT 4.0. These two PC's are connected to the same network. I've configured Samba to share the home directories on the Linux System. I'm able to reach my own homedir from NT. Within NT I've assigned this share to drive L.

I just cranked up Samba 2.0.6 on NetBSD-sun3 1.4. The clients are Windows 98 (non-SE). I have had experience with earlier versions of Samba, so I was able to get 2.0.6 up and running without great difficulty. I exported a directory and was able to mount it on my Win98 machines fine. Using Explorer, everything looked like I expected it to: files were listed with their full names and I was able

I am trying to connect a Win98 SE (second edition) client to a Samba host. I am able to map the network drives, list directory contents and the like. However, when I try to actually access a file from the host, windows hangs for a while and then gives up (with a message like: resource no longer available). The samba logs say something like: connection reset by peer. The samba host is Redhat

Greetings, I have configured Samba 2.0.5a as the master domain controller in a Samba server / Win98 client configuration (no NT anywhere) and most everything works great. Users are authenticated and shares are browsable. I configured the [netlogon] share using the example from the Blair book. Right out of the block it worked like a champ. However, at some point the netlogon.bat stopped being

Hi! Just today, I managed to attach my Win98 client at home to my remote network which is controlled by a Linux samba 2.0.5a server. The TCP/IP connection is working just fine, I'm able to access all services like ftp, telnet, ... The Win98 client is connected to the network using the DialUp-Network. The option "log on to remote network" is activated and as far as I can conclude

Have been running Samba 2.0.6 on a RH6.1 box kernel 2.2.14 for two months now. It is the PDC and storage for documents. It is running on a 10Mb/s local network with 4 Win98 machines. So far there have been no glitches - I have kept to the defaults (just about). I am now thinking of moving a 'mission critical' shared database (currently on one of the Win98 machines) onto the share on