Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[smbfs] Timing problems with kernel 2.2.x?"
1999 Jun 09
7
Do not use stock RedHat 6.0 kernels with SMBFS!
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text
Size: 570 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/19990609/78775f4b/attachment.bat
2000 Jun 28
1
Problem with smbmount and smbfs
I'm not sure if this has already be answered, but when I try to mount
something using smbmount I get an error that smbfs needs mount version 6. I
am running kernel 2.2.16-3 I was running 2.2.14-5.0 and I was still having
the same problem. Is there a fix to this. Or is it a bug. I have not been
able to find any documentation on the exact problem, just other people with
the same problem.
1999 Apr 18
2
SMBFS in 2.2.x
'lo all
Im wondering if anyone is getting the same problem with smbfs as i am
with the 2.2.x kernels
when i try to smbmount a share i get the following on the screen
"SMBFS: need mount version 6"
and also on the telnet shell or actual shell
"mount error: Invalid argument
Please look at smbmount's manual page...."
the mans have nothing
i revert back to 2.0.x and it
2000 Apr 11
1
smbfs support under Solaris8?
The smbmount man page states that the kernel must support the smbfs file
system for ambmount to function. I've been unable to determine whether
Solaris8 supports smbfs. I'd appreciate hearing from anyone who has some
experience here.
Regards,
Rick Wightman
rwightman@agfor.nb.ca
1999 May 14
1
Linux-2.3.1 fs/smbfs/inode.c
Hi. Trying to compile linux 2.3.1 fs/smbfs/inode.c seemed to have a
parse error, missing a semi-colon. Here is the patch for it. You were
listed as the maintainer for smbfs.
Adam
--- linux/fs/smbfs/inode.c Fri May 14 13:19:23 1999
+++ linux-2.3.1/fs/smbfs/inode.c Fri May 14 13:23:43 1999
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
result->i_op = &smb_dir_inode_operations;
else
result->i_op =
1999 Apr 10
1
linux-2.2.5 + smbd-2.0.3 + smbmount-2.0.x
hi ya samba-gurus..
I'm currently using Linux-2.0.35 to backup NT boxes...
linux-2.0.35 + smbmount-2.0.1 works find for things like
smbmount //NT/C /NT_mnt ...etc...
find /NT_mnt -mtime -1 | tar zcvf /backup/foo.tgz -T -
but it fails miserabley on linux-2.2.5 w/ smbmount-2.0.x w/ smbd-2.0.3
( smbmount from smbfs and samba-2.0.3 )
- some linux programs will change all your time stamps on
1999 May 31
1
smbfs: directory listing with duplicate entries
Hello,
smbmount from smbfsx-2.04b-1
kernel 2.2.7
I got a little problem with smbfs. Everything works fine, but sometimes
i get doubled directory entries (not all of them). I turned debug on in smbfs
and it looks that the doubled items come from NT server (4.0 server SP5 (PDC)).
Listing from smbclient is fine.
Here is an example from ls -l on smb share:
-rw-rw---- 1 root samba 848
1999 May 28
2
smbmount error
I posted a similar email recently regarding this. One thing has changed,
however; I have upgraded my kernel to 2.2.6 (hence I'm now using the samba
version of smbmount rather than the smbfs version).
I get the error "no such device" when trying to mount a network drive.
My command line is:
smbmount "\\\\susangra\\c-hd" -c 'mount /mnt'
the console text which
1999 Nov 17
4
2.0.6: HUP/charset/profiles/smbmount/logging
This is the list of problems I had with samba-2.0.6 so far. Can anyone
tell me if he can reproduce them and if he considers them as problems?
2.0.6 on linux 2.2.13 or 2.0.33
1)
sighup/log reopening doesn't always work: connections that are already
active keep logging to the old logs; logrotate rotates/zip the logs and
samba stops logging completely till restart.
2)
Localized chars.
I have
2001 Sep 29
1
smbmount won't work for normal user
Can't mount share on my linux boxes as a regular user.
I have no trouble mounting shares as root.
This problem occurs on both my linux boxes.
All the commands I show I have run as a regular user.
Here is all the data I have:
smbmount \\\\JHAMMER6\\public /mnt/NetWork/JHAMMER6/public/ -o debug=6
mount.smbfs started (version 2.0.7)
Initialising global parameters
params.c:pm_process() -
1999 Mar 31
1
No subject
Can someone explain why smbmount under Samba-2.0.3 (compiled under GNU/Linux
Slackware, kernel 2.2.5, egcc 2.90.29) compiles smbmount, however, when I
run smbmount, it's really smbclient? If I can't use smbmount, then I can't
mount my NT server. smbsh isn't worth crap, it always segfaults on me. I'm
running libc5.5.46. Can anyone help me?
"There are 3 things to remember
1999 Jun 07
2
smbmount Directory permissions
Hello,
I?m having trouble with smbmount & WinNT 4.0 SP 4 Workstation.
Mounting shares on NT from Linux as root is no problem, but
if I try to mount shares as a normal user, the directory I want
to mount the share, becomes gid root and cannot be accessed by
a normal user.
Is there any configuration to do for this like setting permissions
in smb.conf ?
Thanks in advance
Andreas Klein
---
1999 Jun 22
3
smbmount -- what am I missing?
I wish to mount a Win95 share on my linux machine. I can use smbclient
to get to the shared disk, using this format:
smbclient //win95.machine/share <password>
The win95.machine is listed in my /etc/hosts file.
I've tried every permutation of the smbmount syntax that I've been able
to find in the documentation, dejanews, or this mailing list. Perhaps
I've missed some. I
1999 Apr 28
2
smbmount doesn't work
Hi,
Thanks for answering my question on the new smbmount not working. I tried
all variety of combinations on the commands you suggested, but they all
simply do this:
% smbmount -c //server/share 'mount /mnt/samba-share -n CLIENT -U user'
Usage: smbmount service <password> [-p port] [-d debuglevel] [-l log]
Version 2.0.3
-p port connect to the specified port
1999 Jan 27
1
Linux 2.2.0 and Samba client not happening for me
Dudes and/or Dudettes:
HEEELLLPPP! (such a newbie statement)
I can't get my remote SMB mounts to work on my Linux box.
duke was happily running Slackware Linux 2.0.36 and Samba 1.9.18p8 .
I upgraded to Linux 2.2.0pre9 (2.2.0final), which seemed to require
upgrading to Samba 2.0.0 . (I don't remember the exact errors)
Now i can't get my NT and '95 disks to stay mounted on
1999 Dec 29
2
smbfs problems in 2.0.6
I continue to have the same problems in Samba 2.0.6 with smbfs that I
was seeing in 2.0.5:
(1) After a mount (mount -t smbfs etc.), the volume is often not yet
fully mounted. For instance, if I write a Perl script like:
system('mount -t smbfs -o password=pwd //MACHINE/SHARE
/mnt/machine_share');
system('find /mnt/machine_share > find.out');
the 'find' may not find
2000 Mar 18
3
Samba 2.0.7pre2 snapshot released.
Hi all,
I just released Samba 2.0.7pre2, available from :
ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/alpha/samba-2.0.7pre2.tar.gz
This is the second snapshot of the code that should become
the official Samba 2.0.7 and is feature complete (ie. I'm
only going to accept bug fixes, not more features).
This is *not* production code, but should work well as a
file and print server, and contains fixes for all
2000 May 25
2
Errors with smbfs/smbmount
On Wed, 24 May, Todd A. Green wrote:
I've been working with smbfs/smbmount the last few weeks to allow my
linux log processing server access to the logs on our NT servers.
The
problem is that after a period of time all the smbfs mounts become
invalid with either one of two errors.
Yes. I have exactly the same thing. 'Mount' shows them still mounted,
but 'ls -l' on the
2001 Oct 04
2
Broken pipe on ls after doing mount -t smbfs
I have a problem with smbmount.
I have a linux server running E-Smith (or Mitel SME server as it is now) which
is basically a cut down version of RedHat 7.0 (running Kernel 2.2.19-7.0.8smp).
Samba version is 2.0.10. We are connecting to an NT server (service pack 3 - I
must upgrade that sometime soon).
We have quite a good tapedrive and backup software (3rd party) on the E-Smith
server, whereas
1999 Oct 13
2
Samba 2.0.6pre1 released
I've just released a snapshot of 2.0.6 in the alpha directory on
samba.org. This is intended for testing to make sure some of the
recent changes work well on a wider range of sites. I have also built
a RedHat Linux 6.X RPM and put it in the same dircetory.
If you are not running a mission critical site then we would
appreciate feedback on this snapshot.
If you have reported a bug in Samba