similar to: Interesting Setup

I am setting up Samba as a work-around for situation in a Debian/Mac OS X LAN. I have several Debian boxes and several Macs in a small LAN. A new addition is my daughter's new Mac laptop which came with Leopard installed. Older Macs connected to netatalk on a Debian Etch box, but I can't get Leopard to connect. So I'm trying to get Samba running and serving to Mac clients. The

I've just done a little "study" (well, nothing quite that pretentious) of the traffic hitting my router, that gets DROPped the router's firewall. there is a surprisingly (to me, at least) enormous amount of it. over about the last 3 weeks, it has dropped over 65,000 connection attempts. I finally got around to figuring out how to have the router's logging mechanism connect

I have been searching through the docs and on the web to no avail. I work at a university and we are moving our fileservers to new hardware. The problem is, nothing seems to integrate Mac's and Win box's happily. We have a large user base using samba already, but when mac's pick up the same share via CAP, CAP creates files to deal with the dual 'stream' nature of files from a

I forward this message, because, my problems, are the same: Ciao: Fonya Hi everyone, This has already been addressed a couple of times, but none of the solutions proposed up to now seem to help in my installation (I've already tried the samba settings suggested by =R= on 16 Jun 99, to no avail). I have a Linux box running SuSE 6.0 and kernel 2.2.10, netatalk-1.42b2+asun2.1.3, and

Hi, Since the fast track to replacing my NT domain controller didn't work out too well I'm starting with the basics. Right now I have the drafting office setup going from chapter two of the Samba 3 By Example book. My smb.conf is as follows: #########################3################### [global] workgroup = MIDEARTH security = SHARE [Plans] path = /plans read only = Yes guest ok =

I remember a while back seeing someone mention a device that would integrate an apple with a pcnetwork. basically it was a small box that had a samba server built in. you would connect your mac to it with the other side connecting to the hub of a pcnetwork. It would intern allow Apple shares to be viewed in network neighborhood, and macs to mount pc shares./ does this ring a bell with anyone.

Hi, i'm reading: samba-3.0.20a/docs/htmldocs/Samba3-HOWTO/NetworkBrowsing.html#id2564441 ... The election process is /fought out, so to speak/ over every NetBIOS network interface. In the case of a Windows 9x/Me machine that has both TCP/IP and IPX installed and has NetBIOS enabled over both protocols, the election will be decided over both protocols. As often happens, if the Windows 9x/Me

I just successfully upgraded a server from v 2.2.8 to v3.0.7. When I execute smbstatus or swat it correctly shows v 3.0.7. When I browse thru network neighborhood it still shows v 2.2.8. I stopped samba, and removed /usr/local/samba/var/locks/browse.dat & wins.dat. Then restarted samba. It still reports v2.2.8 thru network neighborhood. In viewing browse.dat it shows 2.2.8. Where is this

Hi, I've been following some of the posts (never received a reply to mine but found one similiar). I have a question that I hope you can clarify. Original question: I can see the server from my Windows XP machine using network neighbors, but when I double click on it I get: Path not found One reply: If you're using NT domains (not simple "workgroups")... What is the

I couldn't find anything like this in the archives, although it must be there. We are running Samba 2.0.7 on RedHat Linux 6.0 using Windows 95 clients. Our Network Neighborhood is filled with workgroups that no longer exist. In some cases, someone connected with a laptop that was in a certain workgroup and it was added to the list of our workgroups. Even that that person has been gone for

Hi, I've been following some of the posts (never received a reply to mine but found one similiar). I have a question that I hope you can clarify. Original question: I can see the server from my Windows XP machine using network neighbors, but when I double click on it I get: Path not found One reply: If you're using NT domains (not simple "workgroups")... What is the

Hi, I have a samba 2.2.1a (cvs-06.08.2001) running as PDC for my domain, and it is doing fine. But in the broadcast domain there are severeal other workgroups (no domains) with their own Domain Master Browsers. Additionaly there are always a lot of unconfigured computers not under my control, which build their own workgroups (e.g. mdkhome, workgroup...). My problem is now, how do I prevent all

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:46:49PM +0200, Frank Heldt via samba wrote: > Hello all, > > I’m trying to use samba 4.5.8 as a file server for my Macs (all 10.12.4 now), as a replacement for netatalk. > > I did setup smb.conf as suggested > > # > # Options for macOS > # http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS

Hi! First of all, i want to say thank you to all the people who helped me out the other day with the Mac question. In fact, Netatalk needed to be properly configured. Now i'm having another Mac problem :( and i've not been able to solve it. Well, it seems that although Macs are registering and functioning properly in the domain, they don't appear as such to the rest of the

Hi, I'm using samba 3.0.7 as file server and WINS server. We have a primary domain called BIKER which is working great. Anyhow, for some testing purpose we are using different Workgroups now and then. The problem is, those Workgroups stay in the "Network Neighborhood" although they are offline for quite a while. When I'm moving a Workstation from a workgroup to the domain, it

Hi there, In our Network Neighborhood I can see items for old workgroups and domains that no longer exist. For example, in /var/log/messages I see: Apr 13 04:02:04 ch1 nmbd[9227]: ^ICH(1) current master browser = CH1 Apr 13 04:02:04 ch1 nmbd[9227]: ^IBCH(7) current master browser = FIRE997 Apr 13 04:02:05 ch1 nmbd[9227]: ^IWORKGROUP(5) current master browser = SAFETYLAPTOP Apr 13 04:02:05

Hi, I've got a SuSE 9.0 running Samba 3.0.1 and Netatalk 1.6.3 Samba is a member server of a win2k domain, I'm using winbind to authnticate my users. Well, with the Windows users, everything is ok. But not with the Mac users I'd like to setup Netatalk to authenticate my Macs against the win2k domain as with Windows. Is this possible? I've sarched the web all around and

This one puzzles me a lot: [thba at vink layout]$ nc script/xw_functions.ample NEdit: getcwd() fails: No such file or directory NEdit: getcwd() fails: No such file or directory [thba at vink layout]$ ll script/xw_functions.ample -rw-rw-r-- 1 thba thba 16829 Oct 25 16:59 script/xw_functions.ample [thba at vink layout]$ pwd /home/thba/workarea/colibri/design/ana/layout [thba at vink layout]$

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After having upgraded my W2K clients with SP4, i'm unable to access the [netlogon] share. A look at the <machinename>.log file says: [2003/09/01 16:44:59, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(528) make_connection: connection to netlogon denied due to security descriptor. The netlogon share (if set browseable) is visible from clients, in

Hi! My problem: I have a network with many workgroups and my samba server 3.0alpha21cvs is the only member of one of that workgroups. If I went to the network neighborhood and tried to open the workgroup of my samba server I got an error message saying that the workgroup "mygroup" was not available. So I minimized the settings in the global section of my smb.conf and I was able to