similar to: Create Mask = 0750

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "Create Mask = 0750"

1998 Apr 23
8
Login problem
Hi , I have a problem with NT 4.0 workstation with service pack 3 cant able to login to hp system. From FAQ what i understood is to modify the registry but even after modifying i couldn't able to login from NT 4.0 workstation. Can anybody can able to help me in this matter. Thx Ramesh -- ___________________________ Ramesh Ragineni Ilog (s) Pte Ltd Systems Engineer
1999 Oct 18
2
ACCESS mdb on Samba
hello there. I posted a message like this last week. I still got no answer though. Am I alone in this samba community? Anyways, I have samba working on my openlinux 2.3. I had it up and running (smbd /nmbd). I successfully mapped the shared resource from a win95 box. I started my vb program that gets data from an MS Access mdb file. The program did went on adding new records, deleting and
1998 Jun 26
1
ACCESS
Hi All, I upgraded to samba-1.9.18p7 recently. I am having some major problems with this version It will not allow access to some directories. I am not able to logon . any suggestions. Nadine Hunt
2016 Aug 22
0
File Create Mask - did something change since the update?
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:42:08 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > After updating Samba last Friday (from 4.3.3-1 to 4.4.5-1), some > issues appeared that weren't there before. > > Consider the following share (on a domain member): > > [sharename] > path = /srv/samba/sharename > guest ok = no > writeable =
2016 Aug 22
0
File Create Mask - did something change since the update?
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:25:11 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for finding this for me. I admit, I don't see how my issue is > connected to the described "traverse folder" right, so I am not > exactly clear on what I'm supposed to do now. Are you saying the bug > fix created a new bug that I'm affected by,
2005 Oct 23
0
Problems with 'create mask' and 'security mask' in SAMBA configuration
Hi guys, I am mounting the homes of my users via samba. Both server and clients are linux boxes running Debian Sarge. My samba package (server and smbfs) are 3.0.14a-3. What I would like to do should basically result of: directory mask = 0700 force directory mode = 0 directory security mask = 0777 force directory security mode = 0 create mask = 0600 force create mode =
2007 Jun 10
0
create mask vs security mask
Hello, I'm using samba 3.0.24 on ubuntu 7.04 I'm using the 2.6.20 cifs-driver on my linux-clients. samba has posix-cifs extensions turned on. I want to be able to use the cifs-shares as if they were local. locally I normaly use umask=022 for all files/directories that are created. So I figured I have to set the create mask = 644 and directory mask = 755. Now when I want to make a file
2016 Aug 22
2
File Create Mask - did something change since the update?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:42:08 +0200 > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > After updating Samba last Friday (from 4.3.3-1 to 4.4.5-1), some > > issues appeared that weren't there before. > > > >
2003 Sep 24
2
Part 2: What is the meaning of create mask / directory mask
What we are trying to do is something like where; User A User B User C User D whereby User D's files can be read-write by only C,B ,A whereby User C's files can be read-write by only B,A whereby User B's files can be read-write by only A. that is we want some hierachy . How do we do this ? How do we set the permissions on the actual folders on the Hard Drives and how do we set
2017 Feb 01
3
create mask, create vs copy file
Hi, I have an issue whereby when I create a new file it obeys the create mask defined for the share but when I copy a file from within the same directory the file is created without write permssions for the primary group. Ie: directory has permissions 770, existing file has permissions of 770, create mask is 0770. When I copy a file its permissions are 750. However when creating a new file
2016 Mar 06
1
Map hidden can only work if create mask includes octal 01 (S_IXOTH)
This is probably something simple, but I couldn't find the problem addressed in this maillist. I've upgraded to Samba 4.x from Samba 3.x. I'm just using this for "classic" sharing, not AD/DC. I'm getting an error when I run testparm which I didn't with the previous version (or didn't notice). "Invalid combination of parameters for service public. Map
2004 Aug 11
2
wrong create mask on files
Hello, I have a question regarding Samba 3.0.5: i use samba as pdc for a windows domain. i have builtin acl support and reiserfs with builtin acl support. acl's work fine. the only problem i have is that files are not created with the proper permissions set. i have a user "lilly" who creates files. these files should have rwx for the group "users" (mapped to
2007 Feb 04
1
per-directory create mask
I have set a "create mask" that works well for most uses, but there are some directories inside my shares where I need to make files read-only, and my create mask makes every new file world-writable. Is there a way to specify a different create mask for some specified directories? I thought about making several shares with different create masks, but I'm only allowed to make
2006 Mar 16
1
Values for Create Mask?
We're running Samba 3.0.4.0 on AIX 5.2 and I am using the create mask value in the smb.conf to try and set the default permissions but I can't seem to get the values right. I want the default permissions to be rwxrwx--- Setting the mask to 770 gets me rwxrw---- I've tried several options but can't seem to get the execute value on the group. If someone can either let me know
2003 Jul 25
1
"create mask = 0660" and "map archive = yes" ?
hi all if i define a create mask of 0660 in global, i can't seem to set the archive bit . isn't the archive bit set by setting the execute bit for the users perm ? how do I get around that ? -ipguy
2014 Sep 19
1
create and directory mask ignored for profiles?
On our old 3.6.x PDC profiles are created the way we want (mode 700/600). I am upgrading the hardware and putting OpenSUSE 13.1 with samba-4.1.11 on it. In testing I have found that no matter what I do, profile directories are created mode 770 and files mode 670. The profile share config: path = /local/samba/profiles # this dir is mode 1777, old and new profile acls = yes browseable = no
2003 Sep 25
1
Per-directory "create mask"?
Hi all Please CC me any replies. I am currently running samba 2.2.8a under Slackware 8.1 (kernel 2.4.18) to provide fileserver services to a number of windows 2000 boxes via a single "resources" share. One of the things stored in this share is a collection of Protel libraries used in electronic circuit design. The problem is that protel implements its own access control mechanism for
2010 May 06
1
create mask not fully working?
Hi I have Debian/stable and samba 3.2.5. I have set this (smb.conf): ... create mode = 0770 directory mask = 0770 ... and the files created have those permissions: drwxrwx--- 2 piotrlg piotrlg 22 2010-05-06 14:51 nowy3 -rwxrw---- 1 piotrlg piotrlg 10752 2010-05-06 14:51 nowy3.doc please note the lack of x bit for group file permission (for directory it works as expected). I have to use force
2014 Jan 03
2
create mask for specific files
Is it possible to set a create mask and/or a force create mode with exceptions for specified file extensions? E.g. I want shell scripts (*.sh) with the executable bit set, but other files should not be executable. AFAIK, this is currently not possible, but maybe I'm wrong. Regards, Evert
2001 Dec 05
2
Adobe Photoshop uses wrong permissions when saving, default ACLs and create mask being ignored.
One of our employees is having an odd problem with Adobe Photoshop. Files he saves with Photoshop are saved with permissions 777, completely ignoring both the create mask and the default ACL for the directory. Files he creates with other programs have the correct permissions. This has me stumped. It appears I can reproduce the problem at will. Client is Windows NT 4.0 SP6a and Adobe Photoshop