similar to: smbmount'ed fs "dies" after a short time

> On Dec 10, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 10.12.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Noam Bernstein <noam.bernstein at nrl.navy.mil>: >> I guess this is really a RedHat, not CentOS question, but I?m hoping that someone here will be familiar enough with the upstream policy to have some useful information. >> >> How does

Hi, all. I have OpenLDAP(+qmail.schema), Dovecot, Postfix installed on RHEL 5.1 (x86_64), and they works fine with mbox format. The problem is if i set 'mailQuota=0' in LDAP, postfix can't send mail to recipient user. But it works fine with 'mailQuota != 0', such as '10240'(10M). What's wrong with my mail server setting? How can i solved this issue? Thanks very

Hi group When I use [TAB] to finish the file name ls shows the file. When I repeat the comman with [UP] ls says there's no such file. Any ideas ? The same thing on Fedora Core 3 and FreeBSD 5.3,4.9 [root@vax ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n LANG="ru_RU.UTF-8" SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8:en_US:en:ru_RU.UTF-8:ru_RU:ru" SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16" [root@vax ~]# mount -t

I guess this is really a RedHat, not CentOS question, but I?m hoping that someone here will be familiar enough with the upstream policy to have some useful information. How does RedHat decide which versions to release patches for, e.g. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7613 <https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7613> which has only a RH7 erratum, not 6? And are

Is there a recent survey of that Linux distro and version people are using for the Asterisk installations? I recall seeing a pie chart over a year ago (I think on a wiki but I can't find it again)....also hoping for something more current. I suspect RH5 and RH6 are most popular...but I'm looking for facts -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6. I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what is minimally necessary go from RHel6 to another distribution. I suppose we could discuss "Paul Linux 6" instead of Centos, if that makes you feel more comfortable. (and not

> [jhg at helios RPMS]$ rpm -q dovecot > dovecot-1.0-1_42.rc21.fc5.at but: > dovecot: Feb 05 10:49:21 Info: Dovecot v1.0.rc19 starting up

RedHat 6.0 originally, with upgraded glibc. I just checked the machine again and I was off on the versions. glibc-2.1.3-22 glib-1.2.3-1 glibc-devel-2.1.3-22 Still, pretty similar. As far as I know, those are most recent for RH6. Upgrading the server to 7.x is not exactly easy since it's in co-lo 3 hours away. Plus, until now, I don't think anyone knew Icecast may be effected by this

This might have been covered before and I've missed it. If so, sorry in advance. The file sshd.pam.generic didn't work for me on Linux RH6, I guess it's a Solaris file. Instead I copied the file /etc/pam.d/rlogin to /etc/pam.d/sshd . I wonder if this isn't a good way to go about things anyway, have an install target that does just that? Perhaps the rsh file is more appropriate

Dear all I am trying to set up reports in foreman, but foreman tells me to configure it. What am I doing wrong? I have on the puppet master: /var/lib/puppet/reports/foreman.rb with $foreman_url=http://rh6-puppet-master Do I need the port? /etc/puppet/puppet.conf with in [main] reports = log, foreman I restarted the service service puppetmaster restart in /var/log/messages I find: No

Hello there, I have a serious file locking problem with samba on a RH6 based Linux machine. >From the exported share a database files are being requested. Problem is, only one client can access these - and even only one client can initialize the database query engine, which is btrieve 6.15 workstation engine. The same problem affects .doc files. If one client has an open document, the file is

I'm looking at tuning up a new site and the bonding issue came up A google search reveals that the gluster docs (and Lindsay) recommend balance-alb bonding. However, "team"ing came up which I wasn't familiar with. Its already in RH6/7 and Ubuntu and their Github page implies its stable. The libteam.org people seem to feel their solution is more lightweight and it seems easy

Hi, I'm trying to build samba 2.0.5a on Red Hat 5.2. It originally came with 1.9something, which seemed to have some bugs accessing large mounted directories. I downloaded Red Hat's updates package, but unfortunately it only comes with smbclient and smbd, and what I need is smbmount and smbumount. My binaries from my more recent systems (RH6 and OL2.2) won't run due to

Users are trying to cennect to their home dirs ... the request_oplock_break is failing: [1999/10/21 10:50:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) gpnte109i (137.94.128.183) connect to service s22350 as user s22350 (uid=22350, gid=34) (pid 27704) [1999/10/21 10:50:54, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1136) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 25867

The following shows up in the "orphaned page" list of the Wiki: http://wiki.dovecot.org/MboxLocking?action=show&redirect=MboxSoftwareLocks Does the description of Dovecot mbox locking still apply to current versions? If yes, it should be linked from the "Troubleshooting" page. -- Jim Garrison (jhg at acm.org) PGP Keys at http://www.jhmg.net RSA 0x04B73B7F DH 0x70738D88

Dovecot 2.0.9 on Centos 6.6 I have some local users and some Postfix virtual mailboxes. The config currently has: > # 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # OS: Linux 2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.6 (Final) > first_valid_uid = 190 > log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log > mail_access_groups = mail > mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u >

I have a Linux Samba server I access from a Win2K system. I want to allow a process started from a Windows "service" to access a share on the Samba server. The Windows service is set to run as "LocalSystem" instead of a specific userID. What userID do I need to define on the Samba server to allow "LocalSystem" to access files on a Samba share? -- Jim Garrison

Hi all. I'd like to look into using samba in conjunction with squid, to authenticate users before leaving the intranet thru the squid proxy. I'm using RH6, and thought there may be either a PAM module to do this, or the possibility of authenticating against a PDC or samba server for squid authentication? Thanks, Dave

SAMBA_2_0 CVS doesn't compile on linux rh6.x --with-utmp. Compiling smbd/connection.c smbd/connection.c: In function `utmp_update': smbd/connection.c:349: structure has no member named `ut_syslen' make: *** [smbd/connection.o] Error 1 Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.19446 (%build) David Lee suggested I posted my problems on the list, so here they are: 1) Could the

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 08:40:19AM +0100, Rowland penny via samba (samba at lists.samba.org) wrote: > On 27/05/2019 01:26, Jobst Schmalenbach via samba wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 03:45:31PM +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba (samba at lists.samba.org) wrote: > > > You should have looked before upgrading. ... > > I actually did, I remember now (after I read your