similar to: Slowww access from Win9x to Samba Shares

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Slowww access from Win9x to Samba Shares"

2005 Dec 20
1
compaq v2000 working with correct boot options and compaq r4000 still SLOWWW
Hi, I have a v2000 compaq laptop. The realtek network and USB on this machine was not working. After adding to grub.conf "acpi=off apci=off noacpi noapic" the v2000 realtek started working and the USB worked fine... Fantastic! So I thought I would try those same options on my r4000 laptop. they had no effect.... This AMD turion 64 4000+ rating laptop is still running SLOWWW...
2005 Dec 20
0
compaq v2000 working with correct boot options andcompaq r4000 still SLOWWW
Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote: >/ So I thought I would try those same options on my r4000 />/ laptop. they had no effect.... This AMD turion 64 4000+ />/ rating laptop is still running SLOWWW... />/ /proc/cpuinfo has the cpu Mhz running at 2393 / Yes, the 4000+ is 2.4GHz. >/ below is my dmesg output for
1999 Aug 06
2
Solaris 7 5/99 and samba-2.0.5a
anyone running samba-2.0.5a on a solaris 7 5/99 system and noticed this problem? this samba was built on a solaris 2.5 system and was running fine on a solaris 7 3/99 system. when i installed the solaris 7 5/99 maintenance update something broke. log.smb: [1999/08/06 11:04:41, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) smbd version 2.0.5a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [1999/08/06 11:36:49,
1999 Oct 23
3
semaphores and Solaris 7 8/99
I just installed the 8/99 release of Solaris 7 on three Sun Ultra 10's and it seems to have broken Samba. I am running Samba 2.0.5a and it works fine on an Ultra 10 running the 5/99 release of Solaris 7. All of the Ultra 10's are using the 64 bit kernel. This is the errors that I am getting. [1999/10/22 21:09:56, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(597) ERROR: root did not create the
1999 Nov 15
2
Problem with socket options after upgrading to Samba 2.0.6
Hi there everyone, Again another slight thing I noticed since I upgraded to Samba 2.0.6 from 2.0.5a. I'm using RedHat Linux on a Celeron 400 with kernel 2.2.13. My socket options in smb.conf is set to "TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192". However I've started getting the following everytime I SIGHUP to reload the configs and stop-start:
1999 Nov 12
4
Oplock
Hi Does any one has idea if Samba supports client side oplocks. i.e if we are using "smbclient" If yes how to enable/disable it. Where can we get the details. Thanks Pankaj
2000 Jul 27
1
Sun Solaris 5.8 Beta-Refresh i386
Samba 2.0.5a worked great on my earlier Sun Solaris 7 (5.7) Intel version. But with Solaris 8 (5.8), smbstatus reports that root did not create the semaphore; failed initialize share modes . . . . Is there a samba version out there that has been tested on above platform? And if so, where. Thanks much. Cole Ragland Systems Interface Analyst Phone: 619-938-7116 Pager: 877-727-2856 FAX:
2000 Jun 14
2
Slow initial connect
Hi, I'm running samba on several systems, two redhat 6.1 systems and one Solaris 7 system. On all three there's about a 5-10 second wait upon the first connect before it logs in. This is causing a problem, as on occasion it fails to connect at all - gives no error or anything, just does nothing, especially when double-clicking on shortcuts from the desktop. And the icons for said
1999 Aug 12
4
Samba High Availability
We're using Samba, and it's working very well, however I'm interested in finding out what approaches would work for having some sort of redundancies in place in case the main server crashes. Is there anything in place for Samba in order to have some sort of backup in place in case the main server crashes. The reason is that the server is critical to the company's business, and
1998 Sep 16
2
Performance on solaris 2.5
Hi all, I've installed samba on a sun sparc-station with solaris 2.5. But when i'm doing something that's using the network really intense (like mp3-files playing over the network) the feed is not constant. With mp3 files you can that because you have pauses during the playing of the song. Is this a configuration mistake or something ? cu, Patrick
1998 May 18
3
SAMBA and quotas on FreeBSD
Hi all, I've looked about and I can't find anything on Quotas and SAMBA with FreeBSD. The FreeBSD manual says that I can enable quotas and how to go about it, but I get the feeling this is just for shell accounts. Quotas would be useless in my situation if they did not work with SAMBA as well. All my SAMBA users have shell accounts as well and only save to their home directory - either
2000 Feb 15
4
Locking error in the installation of Samba
Hi! I m trying to install samba-2.0.6 on solaris 7. When i run configure script, it gives me an error checking configure summary ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config it also doesnot find "fcntl" What do u ppl suggest. What kind of locking is on my system. Thanks Regards Amer!
1999 Nov 05
1
strange Win9x-Problem with "case sensitve" - option
Hi, we've got a strange problem with "case sensitive = yes" using 2.0.5a with Win95/98 clients: Directorys directly below the share seem to be empty, if the dirname is lowercase !!? Below uppercase dirs everything is allright and the probem doesn't exist with NT4.0. If we choose "case sensitive = no" everything is allright. (with exeption of the problems we have
1999 Sep 30
2
How to measure performance?
My problem that I don't know a good practic way to measure performance of my system I need fileserver for Win9x machines with files share with dos applications Friendly speaking I need to choose between WinNT and Linux I know there are a lot of parameters in for ex in smb.conf but how to play with it? may be there are some utilities or etc. Any help will be appreciated Thanks in advance
1999 Sep 29
3
AIX 4.32 install (PLEASE HELP)
I've been having problems installing Samba on AIX 4.32. I have spent well over two weeks on the issue and have not had any major success. I can get samba 1.9 series of source code and binaries to work fine but the new Samba 2.0 series code is causing me problems. I have the following system and problem. I have a H50 with 2 NICs; one is ether and the other is token. I can't seem to browse
1998 Sep 24
2
machine name lookups
We have been looking for a way to notify our users when they are running low on disk quota, without sending them mail. WinPopup actually seemed like the best way, so my partner began looking at feeding quota output into smbclient -M when quota was getting tight. The only problem is that smbclient -M frequently fails to find the client's host name. The -I parameter will often fix it, but I am
1998 May 13
3
HELP: SAMBA eats too many Unix resources!!!
Hi all, I've a BIG problem on a Unix SunOS 4.1.4 running SAMBA (samba-1.9.18p3) in order to export some file systems to WindowsNT client machines. The client are using Visual C/C++ 5.x for compiling files (source are remote, but binary are generated on local disks). The problem is that the CPU time and the IO goes... too UP (I've a load average of 8)!!! I traced the clients (with log
1998 Oct 10
5
win98 vs win95 with TCP/IP
You wrote: I have been disappointed that I can't use Linux+Samba as an alternative to a Win9x or NT server for our GP medical practice. The software we need runs in win9x. We crave stability. But Linux+Samba is just much slower as a file server. It's normally quite fast: are you running over a dial-up network, requiring you to adust MTU's for speed??? If not, try ``socket
2002 Mar 14
4
posix me harder
People might find this entertaining and/or useful: http://www.gnu.org/manual/autoconf-2.52/html_chapter/autoconf_10.html With the help of Jos Backus I just discovered the answer to http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync-cvs/2002-January/001271.html is that Sun's test(1) is breathtakingly broken when passed a dangling symlink: $ ln -s /nowhere bad $ ls -l bad lrwxrwxrwx 1 josb
1998 Sep 08
2
Slow VC++ builds from Linux fileserver
We're using Samba 1.9.18p10 on a Linux 2.0.35 box as a fileserver chiefly for software development under VC++. Builds are done from the command line, not the IDE. I'm seeing rather slow build performance under NT4SP3. Build performance is fine under Win95. Build performance is also good when building from Samba 1.9.18p8 running on a Sun UltraSparc. To give some concrete figures, building