similar to: Race Condition cont'd

We have 600 PCs - PIII 450 - with NT4SP4, 10BaseT Full Duplex SMC9432 NICs, 64MB. Server is RS/6000-H50 1GB Memory and 4-way SMP. It serves 64GB of student storage and 8GB shared programs (Read Only). Samba 2.0.5a is configured with 4MB shared mem, TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072. We've moved 200 of the 600 PCs from Novell/Samba combo to all Samba shares. Does

I've been reading many of password sync problems from both this list and the NTDOM list and have come up with a solution that seems secure enough although I had to modify some samba code to make it work. This potential solution is for sync from Unix to smbpasswd and has nothing to do with "unix passswd sync". What I've done is literally rewrite the unix "passwd"

I know in 2.0.5a, level2 oplocks were broken. Can I safely use them in 2.0.6? I recall getting a performance increase when using them. Bill -- /------------------------------------------------------\ | | | William E. Jojo, Jr. | | | | Senior

I just thought I'd throw this out there because it doesn't seem normal to me. We have 2.0.5a on AIX 4.3.2. We initially tried to increase the shared mem size to 4MB. This would not happen until we rebooted AIX. Then smbstatus reported a 4MB shared mem size. Now we are trying to decrease it because we will only need about 2MB and it won't reduce. I suspect it will when we reboot

Well, since alpha 0.0 this has been there.... Any ideas Luke? Using LIBS = -ldl Compiling rpc_client/cli_login.c with libtool "include/sam.h", line 31.41: 1506-243 (S) Value of enumeration constant must be in range of signed integer. make: The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. IBM AIX 4.3.2. IBM C compiler 3.6.6. Any idea when this will be fixed? Bill --

We have 4200 users on 2.0.5a as a PDC. Everything works great, except. We somehow overlooked 300 users from our summer sessions and these people's UID are in conflict between /etc/passwd and /usr/samba/private/smbpasswd. Also why is there no option to REMOVE a user with smbpasswd? I could solve this live if this option existed. I cannot simply edit the file because I could cause machine

This is the second posting of a TNG compile problem on AIX 4.3.2 - this time with alpha0.5 this has been there for some time...can anybody explain why - it's just an enumeration constant problem. Compiling rpc_client/cli_login.c with libtool "include/sam.h", line 31.41: 1506-243 (S) Value of enumeration constant must be in range of signed

forwarding this for AIX people...forgot to CC list.... D'oh! ----- Original Message ----- From: Antonio Sosa To: William Jojo Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:05 PM Subject: RE: SAMBA on AIX 5.1 Thanks William - I'll try it out. Antonio Sosa C.E.O. Ansotech Inc. "We Design Technology Around You" Tel: 877-389-8728 Cell: 773-406-3663

Just thought I'd pass this along....compiling TNG code from CVS on AIX 4.3.2 using IBM C/C++ compiler 3.6.6: Compiling rpc_client/cli_login.c with libtool "include/sam.h", line 31.41: 1506-243 (S) Value of enumeration constant must be in range of signed integer. make: The error code from the last command is 1. The alpha 0.0 code does this: Compiling tdb/tdb.c with libtool

Since I didn't receive any replies to my questions or observations, we were forced to try new things... We upgraded NT4SP5 (which does everything we want it to do) to Windows 2000 Pro and magically it now authenticates against Samba 2.0.6 on AIX 4.3.2. We have some problems however...the logon script does not run and the "LogonServer" environment variable is no longer set to the

When I try to join the Win2k machine to a domain, I get the following message: The following error occurred attempting to join the domain "WIN2K": The procedure number is out of range. This is a Win2k PC attempting to join to AIX 4.3.2 running samba 2.0.7. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Bill -- /------------------------------------------------------\

I a have a problem resulting from a neat tool I developed through the use of the "root preexec" option: This is done in the [homes] section of smb.conf. I launch a shell script with the user name (%u) and machine name (%m). The shell calls a C program to check the users quota and returns a code as the percentage of quota used. Meanwhile, all output of the C program has been captured

Would there be any conditions under which this setting (default to yes) could cause an AIX 4.3.2 machine (samba 2.0.6) to suddenly have all processes (smbd or otherwise) become blocked? I've sent 5 dumps to IBM and they're stumped and this is the only thing I can possibly find from the samba stuff that could possibly cause it. Here is the exerpt from smb.conf: ole locking

AIX 4.3.3 w/ Samba 2.0.7 & IBM C/C++ 3.6.6 Printing problem info again. I modified printing/printing.c/print_file smbrun result from level 3 to level 1 and found the following: [2000/05/26 15:27:31, 0] lib/smbrun.c:smbrun(128) smbrun: fork failed with error Resource temporarily unavailable [2000/05/26 15:27:31, 1] printing/printing.c:print_file(120) Running the command `lpr -r -Phud147l

I've samba running an embedded linux system (2.6.x kernel with uClibc). I'= m trying to transfer some medium to large files (65-225 MB). I'm using simp= le windows explorer drag/drop to write the files to the embedded system. T= he file transfer dialog will show some progress then lock up for a few minu= tes. After this it reports with "The specified network name is no longer

After a brief stint offlist (thanks Bradley), I'm closer to getting SMB/LDAP working but now am encountering something very odd, which he suggested I bring back to the list for "further evaluation". :-) > $ smbclient //TESTBOX/testshare -U dballing > added interface ip=10.15.49.142 bcast=10.15.49.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > Password: > session setup failed:

Hi, What i said above is not true, i didn't realize that the reason the route disappeared was caused by a script that restarts tinc (and also resets the tap device), not by tinc itself. I compiled and installed tinc 0.3 today. It seems to work ok, even on a very slow 486 that caused to crash earlier tinc version. -- Hans Bayle - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon

>I am trying to compile R-0.65 on a Sparc 20. I have gcc 2.7.2.2 and I >have SC4.0. I used gcc to compile R-0.64.2 in July with no problems. >Now when I run configure for R-0.65 I get the following message: > >>checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no >>configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. > >and

Hi Alexandre, Am Montag, den 24.03.2014, 17:42 +0900 schrieb Alexandre Courbot: > Hi everyone, [...] > > A few lines of hacks (not included here) are still needed to deal with cached > mappings triggering external aborts and CPU/GPU memory coherency issues, but I > hope to understand and address these issues next. For the coherency issue part you may want to look at my Nouveau on

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Jon Sargeant wrote: > Ugh, this isn't what I wanted to hear. Passing "complex" differently > than a structure containing two doubles is a bad design, but alas, > calling conventions are beyond our control. How many special cases like > this are there? If "complex" is the only special case, LLVM could There are a huge number of special