Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "FAQ? Speed issue"
1999 Oct 25
0
SAMBA digest 2283
please take us off of the samba e-mail list for the time being thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: <samba@samba.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 5:44 AM
Subject: SAMBA digest 2283
> SAMBA Digest 2283
>
> For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/
> Topics covered in this issue
1998 Sep 22
0
File copy speed differences... writing to SAMBA is faster than reading from it??!
Here's an interesting thing I notice between NTSP3 and Linux 2.0.33+ w/samba
1.9.18p8 [TCP_NODELAY, read prediction on, SND and RCV buffers to 64k, though
I've tried 16k, 32K, 64k, max size 2k, 4k, 8k, 16k, no difference]
When I copy a file from any share to my NT's HD, I get perhaps 280KB/sec.
When I copy from NT HD to Samba share, I get almost 1MB/sec. Doesn't matter
where
2000 Apr 06
0
Please inform samba@samba.org Serge Gavrilov <serge@pdmi.ras.ru> Ed Schernau <ed@schernau.com> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> Cristian POP <cpop@compas.dntcj.ro> Ed Schernau <ed@schernau.com> John Evans <samba@kilnar.com> David Bullock
samba@samba.org
Serge Gavrilov <serge@pdmi.ras.ru>
Ed Schernau <ed@schernau.com>
Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com>
Cristian POP <cpop@compas.dntcj.ro>
Ed Schernau <ed@schernau.com>
John Evans <samba@kilnar.com>
David Bullock <davidb@loftuscomp.com.au>
Gunnar Lindholm <gunnar.lindholm.320@student.lu.se>
Junaid Iqbal
2013 Jul 30
3
SMB throughput inquiry, Jeremy, and James' bow tie
I went to the site to subscribe again and ended up watching some of
Jeremy's Google interviews. I particularly enjoyed the interview with
James and the bow tie lesson at the end. :)
So anyway, I recently upgraded my home network to end-to-end GbE. My
clients are Windows XP SP3 w/hot fixes, and my Samba server is 3.5.6
atop vanilla kernel.org Linux 3.2.6 and Debian 6.0.6.
With FDX fast
2000 Apr 06
0
Please inform samba@samba.org David Barroso <h4371719@alumnes.eup.udl.es> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> "Tulipant Gergely" <tulipant-gergely@dbrt.hu> Edwards Philip M Contr AFRL/SNRR <Philip.Edwards@wpafb.af.mil> Drenning Bruce
Steve Frampton [mailto:frampton@j-com.co.jp] of your address change
Content-Length: 7142
samba@samba.org
David Barroso <h4371719@alumnes.eup.udl.es>
Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com>
"Tulipant Gergely" <tulipant-gergely@dbrt.hu>
Edwards Philip M Contr AFRL/SNRR <Philip.Edwards@wpafb.af.mil>
Drenning Bruce <bdrenni@catholicrelief.org>
Glenn
1999 Nov 11
2
slightly OT Win98 DNS question
I've got a W98/Samba LAN running with a 3Com OfficeConnect LANModem for
shared internet access. Periodically, like every 10 minutes, it dials
out, due to a DNS request for the workgroup/domain (same) name.
Any fix for this? Can I just put a dummy address in all the host files?
Ed
--
Edward Schernau http://www.schernau.com
Network Architect mailto:ed@schernau.com
Rational Computing
2000 Jan 28
4
2.0.7
any prediction on its release?
--
Edward Schernau http://www.schernau.com
Network Architect mailto:ed@schernau.com
Rational Computing Providence, RI, USA
2011 Feb 07
1
Incremental backup with only delta into a separate file.
Hi All,
I am presently doing a small POC with rsync for incremental backup and
restore starategies.
I have come up with certain question down the line, can anyone help me with
the explanation.
Used the config and ideas from:
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/
The commands executed on two machines in sequence
Machine 1:
root at Andruil:~# vim testfile
root at Andruil:~# ls
2005 Oct 07
0
Parallel port access speed, cpu usage
Accessing the parallel port through wine is extremly inefficient:
I have heard of people with 2 Ghz CPUs were the speed of the
parallel port was still a lot slower than on windows. I have
tried on an old Pentium 233 MMX and an AMD K6-2+ 500. Parallel
port access is slow, CPU usage is at 100%. Parallel port
access speed scales with CPU speed.
I'm using the parallel port for an EPROM burner.
2000 Mar 08
1
username case
I've had several instances now on my mixed NT 3.51/4.0/Samba
network where clients on Win boxes would enter a username
such as "THisbites", and be denyed access. The account in
/etc/password was capitalized as "THisbites" and the NT
domain account shows in User Manager as "THisbites".
Nonetheless, Samba refuses them access, and claims (on
a debug level3 ) that
2000 Apr 03
2
sig 11
Linux 2.2.13
Intel
samba-2.0.7pre2 will Sig11 and die on me right after processing
NetBIOS name = FOO in smb.conf.
Not always, but sometimes I have to start smbd 2 or 3 times.
It always fails there.
Any reason why 2.0.7pre2 would do this, and 2.0.6 (from rpm)
never did?
--
Edward Schernau http://www.schernau.com
Network Architect mailto:ed@schernau.com
Rational Computing Providence, RI,
2000 Apr 23
1
directory mode + force directory mode = ???
Can anyone give a brief, english synopsis of how this
works? I must be missing something obvious, or maybe
there IS a need to have 2 similarly labelled config options.
Or maybe I'm lost in the goldbergian method that this applies
permissions (take the real perms, bitwise OR them with the
mask, then apply all the permissions NOT given, etc. etc.)
Help a dummy?
--
Edward Schernau
1999 Nov 21
3
SAMBA digest 2314
Well I figured it out..
did not know that I could make a host file on the winblows client. I knew
about the lmhosts file however..
this is a great list.. thanks to all..
*++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++*
* Les Higger ITAF ,
* Local Area Network Coord.
* lhigger@lausd.k12.ca.us
* Francisco Bravo Medical Magnet High School
* Los Angeles
2003 Nov 06
1
File xfer speed issues with MacOS X 10.2 and 10.3
Hi all,
I have a mixed environment of Windows 2000, XP, Linux, and MacOS X clients
connecting to various Samba servers. Our network is 100Mbit switched ethernet.
Originally, we were using samba 2.2.8a, with the socket options of TCP_NODELAY
SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096. However, the MacOS X clients (which were added
after the initial setup and testing), had horrible file xfer performance;
2000 Mar 30
0
samba/nmbd BUG?
I'll ask this again, as nobody has answered or addressed
this issue yet.
2.0.7pre2 (although it has never worked)
Intel Linux 2.2.13
Samba server serves as WINS server for 3 domains. It
joined 1 of the domains using smbclient. security=domain
I can see entries for the 3 domains in WINS.DAT, and entries
for the 3 PDCs in WINS.DAT. On the same subnet as the samba
server, there is an NT3.51
1999 Nov 20
0
Samba and client oplock breaks over WAN
This only happens with PCs on the other end of a bridged 56k DDS line.
It also affects DOS and W98 clients the same.
Clients can log onto the domain ok, and browse. But trying to drag
a file, or even right-click it in W98 explorer, cause the machine
to hang, and eventually blue screen with a VREDIR VXD error.
If I copy to Samba, sometimes it works, but then the file is zero bytes.
Copying from
2000 Jan 12
0
Browsing Question Here Too!
I've got a samba server, acting as 95 PDC, and WINS, on 1 subnet.
It is routed to another subnet. All PCs use the same workgroup name.
How can I get the PCs to all appear in Network Neighborhood?
They all register with the samba/WINS server.
"Find Computer" works, but only PCs in the local subnet are visible
when you open NN.
Any hints? I've tried "remote announce =
2000 Mar 22
0
WINS weirdness
I have a Samba server 2.0.7pre2 on linux 2.2.13, which has
joined a domain using smbclient. Security=domain, and all
works well.
It is configured to be the WINS server.
PCs and NT boxes in this domain, plus the DCs and PCs in 2
other domains are set up to use this box as their WINS server.
(this is Domain1) The PDC in Domain1 is the master
browser (local and domain).
Here is the problem:
2
2007 Jan 31
2
syslinux-2.11 boot, syslinux-3.20 fail
We used syslinux package on IPCop with success to install from floppy, from
cdrom, from usb key and pxe.
I upgrade the distribution nine month ago from 2.11 to more recent versions
(3.11, later 3.20).
We add one consistent report of a laptop machine that boot with 2.11 but
fail with 3.11 and 3.20
Symptom is that the machine don't display anything after loading the kernel
and initrd.
with
2013 Jul 09
1
rsync speed limited by read chunk size?
Is rsync speed limited to 160MB/sec read speeds due to the chunk read
size? Or, are we seeing just a coincidence and the limitation is
somewhere else?
Rsync (single process) is used to locally copy files from one raid
partition to another and we noticed rsync's read speed is limited.
Whether I setup an rsync between two raid disks or two ram drives,
rsync reads top out at around 160MB/sec.