similar to: bind failed

I'd like to take a moment to thank the samba team for a painless upgrade from 2.0.2/3 to 2.0.4. configure, make, stop, install, start. It was a joy. Woo woo! I've updated for 2.0.4 the patches for my auditing system, the close command parameter and smbwebstatus. Everything should be accessible at http://www.reac.com/samba/ auditing: http://www.reac.com/samba/samba-audit.html This

Bonjour à tous, Je développe une grosse application en Rails 3.2.7 qui est connecté à une BD Postgres 8.4 installée sur la même machine. L''application s''exécute sur Apache avec le module Passenger. L''application est constamment utilisée par une centaine d''utilisateurs et ne pose aucun problème pendant plusieurs heures puis, d''un coup, Rails ne

Hie all, I'm trying to use samba 2.0.4b on a SuSE 6.1 Linux box. What should I do with these two files : samba-2.0.0.dif samba.spec from the samba-2.0.4b/packaging/SuSE/6.0 directory. Is there any modification to do to have samba running without problems on SuSE 6.1 ? Thanks for help. Stephane FROMHOLTZ

I am install Samba on a New RS/6000 M 80. I am installing Samba 2.0.7. I have the services and inedt.conf files with the needed entries and have add a program check my entry. I get the following error in the log file and can not figure out what is wrong. [2001/01/17 12:31:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(863) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)

I have upgraded samba to 2.2.7a and cannot print to my printer attached to my BSD machine. I can use the share dirs, etc, but cannot print. My log file contains: [2003/03/17 16:17:19, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(804) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use [2003/03/17 16:18:02, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(252) 50163099sp (204.250.145.147)

Hi, I installed Samba on Solaris to enable me print from the solaris workstation to a windows print server. When I start smbd and nmbd , smbd does not run but nmbd runs

I can't figure out what is causing the error message of [1999/10/13 11:39:42, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(671) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use) in my logs and thus preventing smbd from serving up connections. How can I track down what is causing this? Samba has been working great and now I must have done something but I don't know what. The

I did a complete installation of Red Hat 7.2 on my Dell Inspiron 5000 laptop from RH6.2. I had SAMBA running on it fine until I wiped my hard drive and installed RH 7.2. So now I have to learn how to set up SAMBA with xinetd. I saw a newer version of SAMBA on the SAMBA.org web site so I downloaded it. After reading the INSTAll file and following the instructions it created an RPM in:

Hi, I've just upgraded an old samba 3.0.23 on an old Fedora Core 5 to samba 3.5.4 using an rpm built from the source. Everything works fine, but when i start the server i get some error messages(see below). Before i start the server there is no connection (tested with lsof and fuser) on the 139 and 445 ports, smbd or nmbd aren't running. With the old version i never had this

Hi, I am trying to install samba on the RHEL. The installation completes but after that I get the smbd dead message upon checking the status: [root@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# [root@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# service smb status smbd dead but pid file exists nmbd (pid 8078) is running... [root@usps-dc1-pc12 share]# The version of RHEL and samba are as follows:

I am getting errors when I try to start smbd which say that port 445 is already in use, but nothing else is using it. In the log, the full error is: -----start log.smbd---- [2004/02/02 11:03:53, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(662) bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use ------end log.smbd----- In my /etc/services file, I have these entries:

Greetings All: I'm a newbie at Samba and have been attempting to get Samba to run on a BSD box with little success. Looking at hte /var/log/log.smbd file I get some wierd error message: [2003/07/28 13:18:36, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(804) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use Also, in the nmbd: [2003/07/28 13:18:41, 0]

As soon as I start up the daemons using the following commands, nmbd dies. /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd -D When I view the nmbd.log it gives the following. We're trying to set up Samba to work over 2 subnets. Smbd is ok and we can still mount our shares. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks for any help. [2002/10/22 10:37:55, 0]

Samba was working well but I changed the host allow section of smb.conf and it stopped. I changed it back and restarted and got this error message in log.smbd [2003/08/17 12:15:26, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(789) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use I have a really simple smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost

Hello I'm a biginner on samba and mailinglists. But I desperate need same help. After updating my samba 2.2.1a to 2.2.2 I can't logon to the domain again. The log.nmdb gives out this information: [2001/11/02 01:22:28, 0] nmbd/asyncdns.c:start_async_dns(150) started asyncdns process 184 [2001/11/02 01:22:28, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(820) bind failed on port 137

Hi. Today I upgraded samba from 3.0.34 to 3.4.4 without changing anything in smb.conf but with changing local and domain sid: old samba 1) net getdomainsid and getlocalsid new samba 2) net setdomainsid and setlocalsid to ones (both the same) from 1) after restarting samba I can't log into domain: XP says : domain controller unavailable ... I tried to rejoin domain - and I can ;) however

On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:55 AM, Henning Brauer <hb-nut at bsws.de> wrote: > We have upd(4) attaching to these devices now. Either nut needs a > driver getting status from upd (trivial, will show up in the > hw.sensors sysctl tree) or we need some way for nut still being able > to talk to the ups directly, without upd and nut interfering with each > other. While a upd(4) driver

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:36:33 +0100 Artur Moor via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If I remove 'nmbd bind explicit broadcast = no' then 'smbd' can't > start because samba is running i jailed einvironment. You should still be able to start 'smbd', are any Samba deamons running when you try the join? Which Samba daemons are you starting ? >

Help please. I am in the process of configuring Samba 3.0.14a onto 4 AIX 5.3 systems. It seems to be working OK on 3 of the 4, but on the last one, I cannot start smbd. nmbd seems to start fine. The smb.conf file matches the other servers except that the server name is changed. Here's the error showing up on the log.smbd file. [2007/05/02 15:19:47, 0] smbd/server.c:main(835) standard

Hi, I'm not sure if it's rsync or Cygwin problem, but most probably both.. Here is a short description: I run rsync daemon on Windows machine (either latest cwRsync or Cygwin versions) and synchronize a Windows directory to Linux server as root: linux# rsync -avH --numeric-ids 10.0.0.1::test /export/test1/ receiving file list ... done created directory /export/test1 ./ 43524353.upd