similar to: Unsubsribe

I have a problem with new version (1.9.18p8) of SAMBA and username mapping. Configuration: WindowsNT 4.0 Workstation + SP1 WindowsNT domain - NTEP01 is PDC Digital UNIX 3.2C Username on NT: Babor Username on UNIX: baborl In SMB.CONF I have following lines: [global] security = server password server = NTEP01 username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map username.map: baborl = babor

> Date: 30 Nov 1998 20:22:27 GMT > From: mathog@seqaxp.bio.caltech.edu > To: mlist-samba@nntp-server.caltech.edu > Subject: W95/98 connect to any SMB share as another user? > Message-ID: <73uuq3$s7j@gap.cco.caltech.edu> > > map H: as \\machine1\share1 as username=John, password=JohnsPassword map > M: as \\machine2\share2 as username=Jane, password=JanesPassword >

> Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 18:36:52 +0000 > From: Michael Anderson <mka@gto1.telmex.net.mx> > To: samba@samba.org > Subject: Advice needed for samba for school use > Message-ID: <37333257.7850176F@gto1.telmex.net.mx> > > Hi: > > I'm setting-up samba 2.0.0 on linux 2.2.1 as a file/print server > for a group of 24 Win98 machines in a mixed-age (K-12)

Hello, after upgrade Samba from 1.9.17p4 to 2.0.7 I have problems with name mangling. Changed parameters in SMB.CONF for new version: oplocks = no client code page = 852 local master = yes all other parameters are the same. I one directory I have these files: 0011_BAR_ISSUEAGRES.CSV 0011_MIR_STKGEN.CSV 0011_OLO_ISSUEMPSPEC.CSV 0011_RET_ISSUEAGRES.CSV When I look to these files (DIR /X) from

The shared mem size option is set to 102400 by default and change is discouraged: The man page (1.9.18p10) says: This parameter is only useful when Samba has been compiled with FAST_SHARE_MODES. It specifies the size of the shared memory (in bytes) to use between smbd processes. You should never change this parameter unless you have studied the source and know what you are doing.

Environment: Solaris 2.5.1 Samba 1.9.18p3 We run samba from inetd (no special reason - just how its been done in the past). Then on one server we got masses of Samba daemons running (up to 40 as a time trying to run - load average 40+!), giving following complaints: Sep 28 14:39:06 zeus.brunel.ac.uk smbd[10728]: standard input is not a socket, a ssuming -D option Sep 28 14:39:06

On our most heavilly loaded Samba server (running 1.9.18p10 under Solaris 2.5.1) we have got occaisional meltdowns with load average rocketing to 100+. The evidence indicates lots of smbd processes running. Syslogs indicate lots of: Nov 12 12:48:35 zeus.brunel.ac.uk smbd[21572]: Failed to set socket option SO_KE EPALIVE Nov 12 12:48:35 zeus.brunel.ac.uk smbd[21572]: Failed to set socket

Nguyen Cao Dat asked about this: ERROR! Out of file structures - perhaps increase MAX_OPEN_FILES? As it happens I have started getting them too - on a PC Application server - the cause seems to be lots of files needed to be open to run applications - Lotus apps seems to be a particular culprit, but experiments indicate that even opening help on Microsoft Word opens 13 files! MAX_OPEN_FILES

>> Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 16:50:55 -0400 >> From: Wolfgang Albrecht <Wolfgang_Albrecht@compuserve.com> >> To: Samba <Samba@Samba.org> >> Subject: Problem mapping drive names on Win95 >> >> in my Office, I'm trying to replace a Novell-server by a Linux-server. On >> the Novell-server, there is the SYS: volume. On this volume is a

We are moving from a PCNFS client to SMB client environment and hence moving from NFS for our Sun fileservers to Samba. I have seen figures indicating Samba is as good NT for SMB service. However what we are concerned with is: a) relative performance of Samba vs Sun's NFS b) loading on servers with lots of active connections (and hence lots of smbds). Do you need more memory than with

I realise that Samba is a voluntary effort and keeping Web Sites upto date may not be everyone's favourite occupation, but there appear to be a number of things missing or wrong: a) There is no contact info for the WebSite I could discern - hence posting here. b) There is still reference to samba-bugs@samba.org address - which I have been informed by it, is now dead. So may be this could be

Hi, in my Office, I'm trying to replace a Novell-server by a Linux-server. On the Novell-server, there is the SYS: volume. On this volume is a directory named DriveT. I did a map on it, so this SYS:DriveT was used as T: . If you link Excel sheets, which are stored on T:, to Word documents, Word unfortunately saves the UNC path, which is \\SERVER1\SYS\DRIVET instead of T: On my new Samba

Our usage of Samba is being questioned with regards to being "non-standard" as against Windows NT servers. As the Samba Survey has been defunct for a while, I wonder if: a) there is any suitable advocacy document listing large and famous users of Samba? b) If not I would be happy to summarise responses from those prepared to go public. I am especially interested in Universities and

[Apologies to sending to both samba & samba-technical lists - but I feel this is an issue to be aware of and an issue that may need fixing] This is what I have discovered with Samba 1.9.18p10 on Solaris 2.5.1: In contrast to smbd which checks its configuration files every minute or so, nmbd only does so on startup and on receipt of a HUP signal. This is not documented in the nmbd manual

I have just been upgrading my Samba servers from 1.9.18p10 to 2.0.6 So far as I can tell users have been happy (or at least not noticed!). Our clients are almost exclusively NT 4.0 (most at SP5). Our servers are Suns running Solaris 2.5.1 and 7. On upgrading 2 of our busier servers (for admin - home directories and NT binaries), I observed a considerable increase in server load. Home server

Current situation: a) lots of Windows NT 4.0 workstation clients b) quite a few Samba 1.9.18p10 servers running on Suns c) 1 Samba server running as WINS server d) NO Windows Servers e) 1:1 correspondance between Netbios names and DNS names f) DHCP currently tells the Windows machines the WINS server. Problem: If WINS server goes down, every Windows NT workstation can not mount anything

[The following is my understanding from doco and experiments - hosts Solaris 2.5.1 and Samba 1.9.18p3, client NT 4.0 - please re-use if wanted] Samba presents a DOS file permissions view to users. That is they can set the following attributes for files: Archive, Hidden and Readonly. As an ordinary user on NT 4.0 System attribute is not accessible. These attributes map as follows onto the

At the bottom of this page: http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast Den tors 29 okt. 2020 kl 11:21 skrev Varón <milongavaronnl at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I am missing beplow each mail how one can un-subscribe. > > Can that be added please? > > > thanks > > Op 28-10-2020 om 16:06 schreef Mayiani, Martin Martine - mayianmm: > > Thanks > > >

Hi, I've removed you from the list, as you requested. On 29 Oct 2020, at 11:41, IAM IAM wrote: > Hi, > Please for the third Times, i want to be unsubscribed. > Tnx > ________________________________ > From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at xiph.org> on behalf of Bananradion > <bananradion at gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 11:24:03 AM > To:

Good morning everyone, It seems the LLVM tutorial is not up to date anymore and doesn't compile as is... The function makeLLVMModule() function doesn't compile at all. Here is a fix: Module *makeLLVMModule() { // Caches the global context to share it with new Module() and IntegerType::get() calls LLVMContext &context = getGlobalContext(); // Module Construction