similar to: NT/UNIX/Samba passwords synchronization

I'm running samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.6. We've have terrific success for well over a year with samba until about a week ago I started receiving reports that users could not open MS Office docs saved on a samba share. The samba logs are full of information about oplocks like this: [2001/03/07 10:14:04, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1204) request_oplock_break: no response

Thanks to Nate Partenheimer <npartenh@butler.edu> I will try this. On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Partenheimer Nate wrote: > > Problem: > > -------- > > Maintaining two password databases for 6000 accounts > > > > Dave, > > This may or may not be something you want to consider... > We have been trying to give users one username and password which will >

An update on my problem with NT workstations accessing Samba running on AIX 4.3.2. I checked the www.redbooks.ibm.com website, and the IBM manual AIX for Windows NT: Solutions for Interoperability SG24-5102-01 states that they recommend a product called Passync by Suntunix. I tried to find their website (www.syntunix.com) and it seems they've gone out of business! Does anyone know

I am trying to use Samba 2.0.3 with encrypted passwords. I have everything set up according to the instructions in encryption.txt, and can authenticate into NT 4 Server shares with smbclient. I can also attach to my smb server using either smbclient or Win95. But NT4sp3 won't browse or connect. That I can connect to external NT shares would seem to indicate that samba is correctly sending

This was in regards to a problem with ms applications hanging on trying to open a file. Turns out it was an nfs locking issue. Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Partenheimer Nate [mailto:npartenh@butler.edu] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:23 PM To: "MCCALLDON "@envelope.hp.com; HP-USA@envelope.hp.com; ex1 " Subject: RE: RE: Explorer & MS Office hang

I am trying to get Samba 2.0.3 up on MacOSXServer (which is BSD 4.4). I can't get NT to recognize samba shares. Samba is running as security=server, pointed to an NT PDC for security (using the netbios name; should this be by ip address?); passwords are encrypted. I can use smbclient to attach to my own samba shares. I can also attach to other NT shares as a client and view network lists. I

We're running Samba 1.9.18p8 (non-PDC) on solaris 2.5.1. Everything works well except that file permissions are inconsistently assigned. Specifically, we are sharing users public_html directories which are mapped automatically by a policy when they logon a WinNT 4sp3 workstation so that a users can, theoretically, copy web pages from a diskette or other server to their web directories using

HI, I am trying to migrate from windows to linux. For that i am integrating existing windows 2003 R2 64 BIT standard edition running ADS with Redhat Directory Server 8.0 runnning on CENTOS5 for user/group and password sync.I followed the step given in centos wiki and i sucessfully synced the users but password sync is not happening.In passync log its telling* "unable to load password

Hello, I have data in the following form age sex Int.Prev.Est.1 Int.Prev.Est.2 Int.Prev.Est.3 Int.Prev.Est.4 Int.Prev.Est.5 93110 93 0 23.75482 57.86592 9.755003 4.343534 4.280714 93610 93 1 53.36475 39.47247 4.381618 1.622119 1.159044 94110 94 0 23.47514 58.23936 10.789339 3.690415 3.805741 94610 94 1

I have Samba setup on a RedHat 9.0 box. Everything configured properly I can manually copy files etc with no problem. However when I try to use windows synchronization I always get an "access denied" on an or all files/folders changed or created. In smb.conf I have it as follows: [files] comment = files path = /file/ valid users = adm public

We are using a Samba domain controller with a Sun Directory Server 7 LDAP backend and we observed that when an account was locked out on Windows, it would not lock the account on Linux as well. We are using Samba 3.0.33 on CentOS 5.3 and this is the change I made: To configure samba to perform proper windows lockout in conjunction with a linux lockout,

Hi, I am executing a HTTP request for more number of times concurrently using Jemetr. I want each thread possessing one request at any cost. Means that when the first thread processing one request, the next request exist in another thread shouldn''t allow to go in .. until or unless the first thread completes the process. Please let me know your suggestions. My package details: Ruby

Found this looping Ubuntu installs with VMI. If unlucky enough to hit a vmalloc sync fault during a lazy mode = operation (from an IRQ handler for a module which was not yet populated = in current page directory, or from inside copy_one_pte, which touches = swap_map, and hit in an unused 4M region), the required PDE update would = never get flushed, causing an infinite page fault loop. This

Found this looping Ubuntu installs with VMI. If unlucky enough to hit a vmalloc sync fault during a lazy mode = operation (from an IRQ handler for a module which was not yet populated = in current page directory, or from inside copy_one_pte, which touches = swap_map, and hit in an unused 4M region), the required PDE update would = never get flushed, causing an infinite page fault loop. This

Hi folks, I am using Xen 2.0.7 with debian based dom0 and domUs on several machines. Every few days I find the clocks of dom0 and domUs on the same machine to differ between seconds and hours. I know this is mentionened every now and then on the list. What I want to know: Is this bug still officially not fixed? Is something done to fix it or is it left as is? I just have to know the state

Hi all, I got a segmentation fault in compiz and after some analysis have a question about synchronization in core compiz functions.

I just pushed a commit which reenables two tests for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576879 libguestfs protocol loses synchronization if you 'upload' before mounting disks http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc8e4b057ecd3984d7c27c8ece54048b6a06d662 This is a really long-standing bug which we thought we'd fixed, but then turned up again. It currently

There was some discussion in the summer on the mailing list about atomicity and synchronization primitives for LLVM. Is there any progress being made in that department? -- Pertti

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Pertti Kellom�ki wrote: > There was some discussion in the summer on the mailing list > about atomicity and synchronization primitives for LLVM. Is > there any progress being made in that department? Nope, not that I know of. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Hello, I understand there's no possibility to have asterisk configuration (sipusers, extensions, voicemail) in LDAP right now. I'm thinking about put the (sipusers, extensions, voicemail) info in LDAP and then run some synchronization script on the asterisk server which will build up appropriate configuration files and reload asterisk. I'm sure this script is already around. Can some