similar to: Browsing problems in IP masqueraded subnet

I am using Samba v 1.9.18p10 on a RedHat v5.2 (Boxset - Server Install) I have set up to be a server on our small network (5 machines running win9x) Everything seems to be ok except i can only browse the network from one machine (pc 5) On all the other machines when i try to map the users drive (in /home/pc*) or another win9x machine on the network i am prompted for a password but no password is

Hi, Does this report ring a bell here? I didn't check, but the image should carry an isohybridized 4.02 version of isolinux. The working (lenny) version is 3.71. Thanks, Feri. -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Subject: Bug#604245: Syslinux fails Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:13:41 +0100 From: Gyorgy Jeney <nog.lkml at gmail.com> To: submit at

Hello! Our dormitory has a linux router w/ two DSL links to the Internet; we used ipp2p (http://ipp2p.org/) for filtering peer to peer traffic (as we can not tell whether the content transferred using such p2p tools has been obtained legally or not, so we block that traffic). Up to yesterday we were using kernel 2.6.10.11, which worked perfectly with ipp2p. Now we updated to kernel 2.6.17.4, and

Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote 192.168.1.20) from this server to another server without public ip and behind a router. I wanted to make the second server visible to the world, so

Printing to a samba print share from a client that is firewalled/ masqueraded is painfully slow. Seems the protocol requires the samba server to make an initiating connection back to the SMB server on the client which will of course fail on a firewalled/masqueraded client. The problem is that the a print job hangs till this operation times out causing printing to take several minutes for users.

Hello, I want to ask that if thee are some ATA decives that i can use to connect mutliple analog phone lines to my VOIP system.. I mean for example an ATA device with 24 ports with 24 independent SIP accounts. For example for some dormitories in my area, i want to put an ATA device and move existing lines to VOIP accounts. Only problem is, if i dont give seperate SIP accounts for all ports, i can

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1115 Bug ID: 1115 Summary: Not all packets leaving the system get masqueraded Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog

Hi, We are running asterisk 1.2.16 and need to connect two channels which are already established. We are currently using app_meetme to achieve that, but we are sometimes unhappy, as app_meetme provides functionality that produces load that we do not need in our two party conferences. I figured out that there is an alternative called app_changrab.

Why ping google ??? you should either ping your assigned external ip address ( make your config dhcp for your external ip address even if it is static ) ( If your dsl link is up you sould have an address if not you should not ) If for some reson you cannot do that, ping your isp''s default gw or someone closer. With google you never know what is going on. I do something similar with -m

Hello all, I wanted to share with you this announcement for an upcoming workshop on the analysis of neural data to be held this summer at woods hole, MA. The workshop has been extremely productive in the past years and we anticipate another good working group this year. This workshop is applicable for any working in time series analysis whether it involves point processes or sampled continuous

I don''t think this has anything to do with Shorewall but I am not too familiar with iptables stuff yet so I''m not sure. Running Shorewall shorewall-1.4.9 on Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 Kernel 2.4.22-37mdk. Run "nmap -sP 192.168.x.x/24" (for example), where 192.168.x.x/24 is the LAN. You can do this from a firewall/router, or even from a

Hi folks, We have tested SAMBA against Netware and found the performance better in all parameters including File Creation/Open/Close, although the creation speed was almost the same (is there any reason?). But the other day we did some stress test on an application with SAMBA (under Linux) as the fileserver. This will create a large number of files (about 10000), all of these files going to

hi list, i got a small problem. here is my setup: WAN | | | bridged $FW-------DMZ | | masqueraded | LOCAL my shorewall machine ($FW) got three interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 * eth0 is connected to the WAN * eth1 is connected to my DMZ * eth2 is connected to LOCAL network i manage a whole C class (public adresses) in my DMZ, let''s say X.Y.Z.0/24 * my router

Hello guys, normally, I try to avoid advertising my linux distribution in non-commercial mailing lists (even though it''s 100% open source), but yesterday''s story amazed me so much that I simply have to. What happened yesterday? My largest customer switched from multiplexed DSL-Lines (copper) to optics, and I did some quick measurements on the performance of Route Hat.

Hello Everyone! I am using shorewall-3.0.5 on suse linux. Recently we have implemented dansguardian running on 8080 and squid on port 3128. Previously (before dans guardian) masquerading was working fine but after the implementation of dansguardian masquerading is not working. My rules file has entry Previous entry was ACCEPT loc:192.192.192.3 net REDIRECT loc 8080 tcp

Dear all, I''ve the following problem with routing + NAT: If I''ve two ISP and I''m using two nexthop in default route with MASQUERADE on both ISP links, I see routing cache regenerated, but sometimes packets sent to a new link (after cache regeneration) uses wrong source address for masquerading. Here is the config. I''ve two links to outside via two

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Shorewall-3.0.3 RH9 (+legacy updates) eth0: loc: 192.168.1.0/24 eth0:0: loc: 192.168.20.0/24 eth1:: 69.70.32.8/29 I''m worked all day on an issue I found today and I just can''t find a way to fix my problem. So, basically, for now, my network looks like this: Internet ^ | (69.70.32.8/29) Firewall 192.168.1.1

Dear list members, Masquerading does''not work for me. This is a Mandrake Linux 10 system, but I use another kernel, that included in the original distribution (original: 2.6.3, now used 2.6.8 because of a lot of suck with OpenSwan with kernels prior 2.6.4). The problem seems to be similar or identical mentioned here:

Hi, I have a linux box which balances load between two interfaces ( say WAN1 and WAN2). I have masquerading on for any request coming from LAN to the outside world. The setup is in such a way that WAN1 drops packets with source ip belonging to WAN2''s network and viceversa. For some strange reason, I find that packet coming out from the WAN interface has source address of WAN2 and

Samba Gurus: I just upgraded from samba-1.9.15p8 to samba-1.9.18p8 on one of our Sun boxes (Solaris 2.5.1). When I try to connect to the samba server from another machine with smbclient I get the following error message: smbclient -L odin Added interface ip=192.10.11.32 bcast=192.10.11.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Server time is Wed Oct 28 15:17:47 1998 Timezone is UTC-5.0 Password: Session setup