similar to: password compatability between nt&unix

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "password compatability between nt&unix"

2002 Feb 04
0
XTerminal issue
What does wine exactly trying to do when i run it remotely? I've got some XTerminals and I'd like to run MSOffice on them (on the app server, actually) but when i try to w(h)ine it starts up, makes noise on the net for some 5mins (doing the fonts). After that it dumps an error message saying that he's run out of resources (the X server I think). --
1999 Apr 15
2
Excel 'save as HTML' problem with Samba 2.0
Hello, Eversince I upgraded Samba to 2.0 version I've gotten so many calls from the users regarding Excel 'save as HTML' problem. What seems to be happening is that the users cannot save their Excel spreadsheet as html file when they were able to with the previous Samba version we had installed (Samba 1.9.18p10). According to MS 'knowledge database', this is a known MS Excel
2009 Mar 23
1
Iterative Proportional Fitting, use
Hi list, I would like to normalize a matrix (two actually for comparison) using iterative proportional fitting. Using ipf() would be the easiest way to do this, however I can't get my head around the use of the function. More specifically, the margins settings... for a matrix: mat <- matrix(c(65,4,22,24,6,81,5,8,0,11,85,19,4,7,3,90),4,4) using fit <-
2009 Jan 14
1
loglm fitting
Dear all, sorry to bother you all with this but I've been trying to use the loglm in MASS package (v2.8.0) and cannot get any sensible output. I'm wondering am I doing something very foolish or missing something obvious. For example, I tried the documentation help(loglm) example - here's the code # Case 1: frequencies specified as an array. sapply(minn38,
1999 May 06
1
spawning smbd daemon
Hello, Does anyone have problem with spawning smbd daemon (own by root)? I thought there should be only one smbd daemon running that is owned by root and any other smbd should be owned by users who is using Samba services. Description of my system: Samba-2.0.0 on Compac Proliant x86 running Solaris 2.6 -- --------------------------------------------------- Sunny Hwang Guzman
2001 Sep 25
0
AW: Antwort: Win 2000 Compatability issues
Hi, i agree with Stefan. I have the same problem with Win2K Client and SAMBA Server. But on my situation i have one PC that i can make a connect and all the other not. Alle workstation are on the same group, are all in the same SubNet; but i can?t see my SAMBA _ Server so well like on this machine that is working. So is there any other problems on SAMBA ? Kind regards Matthias
2010 Dec 21
1
adobe cs5 + System 32 .Dll for increased compatability
Heya I made 2 torrents one is to paste in the virtual c drive, it has all the windows xp .dlls so copy all the files (one in folders will have to be done by opening folder and copying into the folder now copy and paste system 32 folder) it should increase compatability: http://extratorrent.com/torrent/2346325/System+32+.Dlls.html Please Seed CS5 .DLLs needed to run adobe Cs5:
2005 Aug 01
4
Backwards compatability
In doing my testing I''m wondering if maintaining backwards compatability for existing applications is important. The question boils down to this: Are there sufficient applications that are using wxRuby (pre swig) that we should expect to have to support all/most without changes or should we expect that most applications will need to learn the ''new'' ways things
2004 Oct 11
0
Sun Forte 9 / configure compatability problem with 2.0/1.9.x (PR#7278)
Full_Name: Mike Pacey Version: 2.0, 1.9.x OS: Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (194.80.32.8) Symptoms: -------------- It seems the latest version of the Sun Compiler Suite (Forte 9) has compatability issues with R's configure script. Starting with a fairly vanilla configure (I'm using 1.9.1 here, but I've replicated the problem on 1.9.0 and 2.0.0): % export CC=cc % export F77=f95
2006 Oct 31
0
6389368 fat zap should use 16k blocks (with backwards compatability)
Author: ahrens Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 0fdac67554fe0f4938120fb4f0cb35cbbcd38c0b Log message: 6389368 fat zap should use 16k blocks (with backwards compatability) Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/dbuf.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/dmu_tx.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/dnode.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zap_impl.h update:
2002 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
Is the #include <endian.h> necessary for Linux or is that a leftover artifact from before? I'm trying to get this code to compile on MacOS (which is based on BSD), and stdint.h exists there, but not endian.h. --Vikram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VIKRAM S. ADVE Assistant Professor E-MAIL: vadve at cs.uiuc.edu
2002 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
ISSUE: In CommandLine.h, gcc 2.96 thinks that the apply() template function, when called as: apply("Some text string", x) should be expanded to applicator<const char[n]>("Some text string", x) instead of applicator<char[n]>("Some text string", x). ACTION: Duplicate the template specialization for applicator<char[n]> as applicator<const
2002 Sep 13
2
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
ISSUE: In Interpreter::getCurrentExecutablePath(), dladdr() is a Solarisism. Luckily, getCurrentExecutablePath isn't being currently used anywhere in lli. ACTION: Wrap the method contents with #ifdef __sun__ ... #else return ""; #endif. If this functionality is actually desired, it would be more portable to hack up main() to join getcwd() with basename(argv[0]) to find the
2002 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
ISSUE: In Interpreter::executeInstruction(), _sys_siglistp is a Solarisism. ACTION: Replace _sys_siglistp[signo] with strsignal(signo) which is more portable, maybe POSIX? PATCH: Apply from llvm top-level directory with "patch -p0." -- Casey Carter Casey at Carter.net ccarter at uiuc.edu AIM: cartec69 -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text
2002 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
ISSUE: ExternalFunctions.cpp::lookupFunction() calls dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, ...). In glibc, dlfcn.h does not make RTLD_DEFAULT visible unless _GNU_SOURCE is #defined. Unlike the evil money-grubbing non-free software pigs at sun, the FSF is trying not to pollute the C namespace. ;) ACTION: Hack the Makefile to #define _GNU_SOURCE while compiling in tools/lli. Yes, I know that this is ugly.
2002 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
ISSUE: Linux doesn't have any steenking SIGEMT signal, as referred to in lib/Support/Signals.cpp. ACTION: Wrap the use with a #ifdef SIGEMT / #endif. PATCH: Apply from llvm top-level directory with "patch -p0". -- Casey Carter Casey at Carter.net ccarter at uiuc.edu AIM: cartec69 -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
2002 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
> ISSUE: INT64_MAX undefined in InstrSelectionSupport.cpp and > InstructionCombining.cpp. I'm not completely sure where INT64_MAX comes > from on Solaris, but C99 says that INT64_MAX is defined in stdint.h, > but, for C++, only if __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS is #defined. Solaris (at > least in CSIL) unfortunately does not have stdint.h, but it does have > the old inttypes.h - and
2002 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
> ISSUE: In Interpreter::getCurrentExecutablePath(), dladdr() is a > Solarisism. Luckily, getCurrentExecutablePath isn't being currently > used anywhere in lli. It looks like under my linux box, the dladdr prototype is wrapped with a #ifdef __USE_GNU option... If so, perhaps the write patch is to add -DGNU-SOURCES (or whatever that option is) to the makefiles? Can you verify that
2002 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
> >Interesting. INT64_MAX is supposed to be provided by > >include/Support/DataTypes.h. Do you know of a reliable preprocessor > >symbol that can be used to determine whether we're on a linux box, or > Well, there is always __linux__, but that doesn't necessarily imply that > we are on a Linux box with stdint.h. Ok, I'll switch to that from the placeholder
2002 Sep 13
2
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
Chris Lattner wrote: >>>Interesting. INT64_MAX is supposed to be provided by >>>include/Support/DataTypes.h. Do you know of a reliable preprocessor >>>symbol that can be used to determine whether we're on a linux box, or >>> >>> > > > >>Well, there is always __linux__, but that doesn't necessarily imply that >>we