llvm dev - Sep 2002 - [LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability

ISSUE: In CommandLine.h, gcc 2.96 thinks that the apply() template 
function, when called as:

 apply("Some text string", x)

should be expanded to

 applicator<const char[n]>("Some text string", x)

instead of

 applicator<char[n]>("Some text string", x).

ACTION: Duplicate the template specialization for applicator<char[n]> as 
applicator<const char[n]>.

PATCH: Apply from llvm top level directory with "patch -p0":

-- 
Casey Carter
Casey at Carter.net
ccarter at uiuc.edu
AIM: cartec69

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20020913/8024e6f6/attachment.ksh>

> ISSUE: In CommandLine.h, gcc 2.96 thinks that the apply() template
> function, when called as:
> ACTION: Duplicate the template specialization for applicator<char[n]>
as
> applicator<const char[n]>.
>
> PATCH: Apply from llvm top level directory with "patch -p0":
Applied to the mainline tree.  Thanks!  Note that currently the CSIL tree
is out of sync w.r.t the mainline CVS tree.  I expect that they will sync
up again after MP1 is done, but I'm not sure.

Thanks again for the patches!

-Chris

http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/