similar to: SAMBA digest 1928

samba@samba.org schrieb: > SAMBA Digest 1929 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) samba-2.0.0beta4 > by xuwenwei@163.net > 2) Re: SAMBA digest 1924 > by Rudolf Spreckels <Rudolf.Spreckels@mh-media.de> > 3) Problems connecting over

There was an interruption in mail service and your memo was not sent. Please re-send your message. Thank-you -----Original Message----- From: samba@samba.anu.edu.au <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> To: Multiple recipients of list <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 1:24 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 1861 > SAMBA Digest 1861 > >For information on unsubscribing

Headway Research is closed for the Christmas and New Year holidays. Normal work will be resumed Monday January 4, 1999. Your email will receive the appropriate attention upon our return. We wish you a safe and happy holiday season!! *************************************************************************** Headway Research, Inc. |Telephone: 972-272-5431 3713 Forest Lane

Majid, On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:20:31 +1100, Majid Tajamolian wrote: >> >; hosts allow = *.bol.sharif.ac.ir >> >; hosts allow = .bol.sharif.ac.ir >> >; hosts allow = 194.225.42.* >> > hosts allow = 194.225.42. >> >2. As you see above, if I use a domain detector except with the format >> > "194.225.42." , clients on our LAN

Hello, Documentation states that one should set up only one Samba server as WINS server. While NT's TCP/IP setup has two entrys, one for a primary and one for a secondary WINS server I wonder why there should be only one Samba WINS server. Has anyone tried this with two Samba WINS servers? Did you suffer from any interferences. I did and the machines are running perfectly smooth. Did I

I have been using Samba 1.9.18p8 in a Solaris 2.6 machine for months but suddenly this week there is a problem. Nothing's changed. I have some persistent connection of my NTSP3 client to the samba share. When I login as usual, it fails to mount the drive. It either prompt for password but whatever password the samba rejects, or give a "Access is Denied" when you try to access the

Matthew, On Wed, 29 Apr 1998 10:30:19 +1000, Matthew Geier wrote: >> After stopping that still living nmbd and restarting it everything was >> fine again. >> >> It is perfectly possible that the link between subnet 160.18 and 160.19 >> was broken at this moment caused by a leased line maintenance done by >> our line provider. >> >> What still

Hello, I am using a Linux-Server with Samba 1.9.18p8. I have the problem that I can't see the directories [.] and [..] on DOS-Clients (MS-DOS Computer, DOS/WinOS2-Box from OS/2 and DOS-Boxen from Win95). That's very troublesome if your are in a Fileselectbox and want to change to the updir. Here is the part of my smb.conf for the share: [daten] comment = Daten path = /netz/daten

Hi, The name of the identity file defaults to what fill_default_options() in readconf.c does: SSH_PROTO_1: "~/%.100s", _PATH_SSH_CLIENT_IDENTITY SSH_PROTO_2: "~/%.100s", _PATH_SSH_CLIENT_ID_RSA "~/%.100s", _PATH_SSH_CLIENT_ID_DSA Identity files are always expanded by tilde_expand_filename() which gets the name of the home directory from

Currently I'm using a linux+samba+PPP I didn't had to do something special to disallow samba over the PPP connection. Must I do something to disallow samba over a second NIC (=not the LAN) or how must samba be bound to the nic of the LAN ?

OK. Maybe I was a little terse in the description. I have a CD we (Candle) created. It installs one of our products by executing the setup.exe program. I am able to execute the program off the CD with no problems. I then copied the contents of the CD to the Samba share. I try and execute the setup.exe file and get this error. If I then copy the files from the Samba share to /temp, I can

Hi all. I'm experiencing long connect delays due to password file locking errors. For each connection samba logs the following errors: do_pw_lock: failed to lock SMB passwd file. mod_smbpwd_entry: unable to lock file /usr/local/samba-1.9.18p10/private/smbpasswd In the archives I found some other messages reporting the problem (on May this year), but no solution. Did I

Hi. I have a samba install, samba-1.9.18p4, with security=server. Users are validated against the NT domain controller correctly, and user accounts do exist on the unix box (AIX 4.2.1) Problem is that while the uid of the files that users create is correct, the group id is always sys, even though the users have as primary gid STAFF. The definition of the share I am trying to create is: [cslan]

Hi, On 04/19/2013 09:40 AM, Unnikrishnan C wrote: > access to memory locations. > > example > suppose we have > A[ind1[i]=expr; (s1) > and A1[i]=A[ind2[i]] (s2) > > to find what is the probability for RAW dependence from s1-->s2 and WAR > dependence from s2--->s1 and WAW dependence from s1-->s1 > There exists the

Hi all, I do have a question to Andrews statement... https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-January/171054.html > You might be able to instead upgrade your Novell domain into Samba 4.0's > AD DC, if it currently backs a Samba 3.x 'classic' domain (or can be > made to), [...] I'm a little confused. I am probably able to run a Samba3 acting as a PDC with my eDir users

this isn't strictly a samba question, but it is related in that i'm trying to a samba server as my domain master browser and multiple samba servers as local master browsers for a workgroup across multiple subnets. everything seems to be working wonderfully except for one WfWG host which does not show up in the browse list as expected. i notice that this host is announcing itself as a

Hi all. Since I move on to 2.6 kernel , filter ingress policy based on nfmark won´t work. Sorry for my english. Simple example: iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 1 ${QDISC_ADD} handle ffff: ingress ${FILTER_ADD} parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1 fw \ police rate 128Kbit burst 10k drop flowid 2:11 # tc -s -d qdisc ls dev eth0 qdisc ingress ffff: ----------------

Hi, I solved it. From the ConstantStruct you can call getOperand() multiple times, so "mine" as deep as you can. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < alexandruionutdiaconescu at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > Thanks for the response. > > I already did this : > > I cast the entire annotated expression to Value*. Then, in

Hi Sebastian, Thanks for the response. I already did this : I cast the entire annotated expression to Value*. Then, in order to avoid ugly things like getAsString(), I check if V->getValueID() == Value::ConstantArrayVal in order to cast it to ConstantArray. Because it contains only array[0], I cast array0>getOperand(0) to ConstantStruct. Therefore, from ConstantStruct you can get all the

Hi, According to ChangeLog someone "(bal)" removed -{enable/disable}-suid-ssh from configure (dating from 2002/06/07). Don't know the reason, probably this has something to do with PrivilegeSeparation. Consequence is: Users with UID != 0 are no longer able to allocate privileged ports, sshd answers "Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be