similar to: Odd behavior w/ read raw and write raw under NT1

Headway Research is closed for the Christmas and New Year holidays. Normal work will be resumed Monday January 4, 1999. Your email will receive the appropriate attention upon our return. We wish you a safe and happy holiday season!! *************************************************************************** Headway Research, Inc. |Telephone: 972-272-5431 3713 Forest Lane

Hello, I am trying to figure out how the different values for "max protocol" and "min protocol" (as seen in the smb.conf man page under the "max protocol" section) correlate to the Microsoft jargon for the different logon protocols. Here is what I've determined. Could some please verify this for me? Samba Microsoft CORE

Hi. We have been using samba 3.0.11 for years and now we need to add some win7 machines to our domain. So I test up-to-date Samba versions (3.6.19, 4.1.0 compiled, and Centos today "native" binary package 3.6.something) and with all of them I run into the same problem. I get stuck with protocols when checking XP machines (which works like a charm in 3.0.11 domain) When max protocol is

Hello Gentlemen. OK, Tests were made. I got some errors only when using Samba48 (samba47 is still fine) IMPORTANT: I forgot to mention... This is being used with SQUID Proxy for SSO authentication. Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207 Got user=[user01] domain=[MYDOMAIN] workstation=[ADCONTROL01] len1=24 len2=338 Login for user [MYDOMAIN]\[user01]@[ ADCONTROL01] failed due to [{Access Denied} A

Hi Rowland, Thanks Much for the help, as usual! About Kerberos: Yes, I have implemented Kerberos and NTLM. I need both working. About winbindd_privileged: Not sure what you mean with " I think you might want to check that again, the 'winbindd_privileged' dir went away quite some time ago." Shouldn't that folder be there anymore? Everytime I install Samba47 or 48 it creates

hi folks, i have now a squeeze box, 2.6.39.3, xen 4.2 unstable running. for a remus sync, I need the disks (lvm) to besynced which I wanted to do with drbd protocol D. I downloaded the source from git://aramis.nss.cs.ubc.ca/drbd-8.3-remus drbd-8.3-remus page and made: (http://remusha.wikidot.com/configuring-and-installing-remus) git clone git://aramis.nss.cs.ubc.ca/drbd-8.3-remus drbd-8.3-remus

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 17:04:39 -0300 Kontrol-Suporte via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Gentlemen. > OK, Tests were made. I got some errors only when using Samba48 > (samba47 is still fine) IMPORTANT: I forgot to mention... This is > being used with SQUID Proxy for SSO authentication. > > Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207 > Got user=[user01]

hi all, coming finally to the end, remus, all works except some questions? 1) I protect 1 guest (remus -i 100 server01 10.41.10.42). how can I protect 3 guests? like to execute 3 commands like remus -i 100 server01 10.41.10.42 remus -i 100 server02 10.41.10.42 remus -I 100 server03 10.41.10.42 2) how can I see if remus works? are there any douc''s for command line switches? 3) does

Dear List, i''m experimenting with remus with the following setup. dom0: - Debian Squeeze - Jeremy''s 2.6.38.48 kernel - xen 4.1.2 recompiled from sid - DRBD for block device backend domU - Debian Squeeze Remus is working fine unless i try to give more than 1 core to the domU. Here''s the error from remus when i''m trying to enable it for an SMP domU:

Hello guys, First of all I need remus support for a Debian 6 system (kernel 2.6.32-5 : Xen-4.1.1). Debian-customized kernels don''t actually support remus. There''s a patch here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608988 that suggests adding the support for upcomming releases of the kernel, yet only in the wishlist. I have downloaded jeremy''s xen.git

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: wishlist [resending from another address since my ISP seems to be queueing emails for up to 25 hours and counting...] I did some experiments with the xen remus HA system. With overlord3:~$ debdiff xen_4.0.1-1.dsc xen_4.0.1-1lindi1.dsc diff -Nru xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real --- xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2010-08-02

Hi All, Does anybody have this problem when try to migrate DomU : Error: /usr/lib/xen/bin/xc_save 22 6 0 0 0 failed I use xen 4.2.2-pre compiled from sources and my machine is Ubuntu 12.04 Linux with kernel 3.2.0-29-generic. Its working perfectly, even remus with drbd support migration was running successfully before. However today after I kill the remus process with command pkill -USR1 remus

hi xen cracks :-) i managed sucessfully to install xen4 on a debian 6.0 squeeze amd64 box, running 3 hosts windows 2008r2 server and 1 host squeeze. i use a hp server dl 160g6 dual processor with 48gb ram and 2 tb disks with sw raid 1. i have an indentical hardware box to setup remus. now, the problem is, i cant find remus on my box, like i saw it in several descriptions: /usr/bin/remus!

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: wishlist I did some experiments with the xen remus HA system. With overlord3:~$ debdiff xen_4.0.1-1.dsc xen_4.0.1-1lindi1.dsc diff -Nru xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real --- xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2010-08-02 16:10:13.000000000 +0300 +++ xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2011-01-05 00:32:41.000000000 +0200 @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@

Hello, I am trying to set up a Xen/Remus test configuration on AMD64 hardware (HP DL380 G6) under SuSE 10.1 and am having trouble. I was able to run and configure the Xen 3 that came with SuSE fine, but as far as I can see, I have to use Xen 4 to get Remus. I managed to build Xen 4 from source and it seemed to install, but I am not sure how to get the proper kernel and/or initrd files in place

Hi everyone I've installed package xen-hypervisor-4.0-i386 (and related) on debian squeeze, using the available debian packages. According to the Remus website http://nss.cs.ubc.ca/remus/ and xen websites, remus (binary) should be available since xen 4.0.1. I can't find the binary though. I have installed: ii libc6-xen 2.11.2-7 Embedded GNU

Dear all, I have sent this problem earlier but maybe its not detail, here I try to write more detail. I hope anybody can help me to point out the problem. First of all I used Ubuntu 12.04 x64 both for domain0 and domainU with modification to run under xen hypervisor and work with remus. I follow and configured the remus with this notes

Hello, I have been playing around with Remus on Xen 4.0.1, attempting to fail-over for an HVM domU. I''ve run into some problems that I think could be related to tapdisk2 and its interaction with how one sets up Remus disk replication in the domU config file. A few things I''ve noticed: -The tap:remus:backupHostIP:port|aio:imagePath notation does not work for me, although this

hi xen cracks, i know that this formum might be the wrong one for my question but maybe the last and/or only one what can give me my questions answered. i know how to setup and run a xen infrastructure, i have several server in production. the new thing is, that i started to use the debian squeeze, cause of the native suport of remus (kernel support), as everyone say: hardware ******* hp dl

Hello I successfully upgraded to xen 4.0 on my Gentoo servers and I''m trying to use remus to enhance servers'' HA. first of all: I''ve tried remus with --no-net option just to test and it works fine, if I try to run it without that option it just stops claiming that no sch_queue module can be loaded. That module is present in xen 4.0 source tree, but my gentoo seems not