similar to: backup PC client

Hi Aki, Thanks for your reply. Sorry, hit the reply to and not the reply to all option. So, even when a folder is a public folder I'm still needing to use the acl plugin? The public/TestFolder is showing up, the public/TestFolder1 is not. Thanks. Dave. On 4/14/17, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > Please keep responses on the list. Thank you. =) > > Without ACL

Hey Guys and Gals, I'm wondering if the quotas.c file is supposed to fix the problem where a Linux x86 system running with the quota software causes corrupt files to be written by Windows clients. I compiled it in and it didn't seem to make a difference for the following problem. In other words, if I enable quotas on my RH6.2 / 2.2.16-22 kernel box and then write a file via Samba/Windows

Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.29 on a freebsd 10.3 system. I'm wanting to optimize how the system is running and have a few misc questions. First ssl, is my cipher list good? I'm trying for pfs and wanting to ensure these cipherlist is appropriate: ssl_cipher_list = EECDH+AESGCM:EDH+AESGCM:AES256+EECDH:AES256+EDH Next, a new feature that I'm trying for is virtual folders that

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 Summary: GPFS ACLs are not copied by rsync when copying between two GPFS filesystems Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Can you try turning mail_debug=yes and posting logs? Also if possible, can you try telnetting to the server and issuing a LOGIN username password a SELECT public/TestFolder1 with debug turned on? ACL plugin is needed *iff* you want to *restrict* access. Aki > On April 14, 2017 at 11:53 PM David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Aki, > > Thanks for

Hello, Thank you for your reply. Here's my acl files: public/TestFolder dovecot-acl anyone lr user=user1 akxeilprwts -user=user1 user=user2 lr public/TestFolder1 dovecot-acl user=user1 lr user=user2 lr public/dovecot-acl user=user1 lr user=user2 lr and I have another dovecot-acl file in shared/office folder: user=user1 at domain.com lrwstipekxa user=user2 at domain.com lrwstipekxa

Hello, I'm running Dovecot 2.2.3, and am having issues with my public folders, shared folders, and virtual/ALl folders apparently ACLs are on that list as well. I was debugging an unrelated problem with my smtp server and got the following dovecot debug log output. Below is also a doveconf -n output as well as my shared-folder definition file and my global-acls file. What I'm trying to

Please keep responses on the list. Thank you. =) Without ACL plugin there is no way to restrict access, it's free for all. my site is a very tiny few user site, but ... auth_mechanisms = login plain mail_attribute_dict = file:%h/Mail/dovecot-attributes mail_location = sdbox:~/Mail mail_plugins = stats quota fts fts_lucene namespace inbox { inbox = yes list = yes location = mailbox

Since you have obfuscated your data it is hard to tell what's going on, especially as in your previous log you have 'user=user' and now you have user1 and user2. You can try doveadm rights -u victim folder to see what sort of rights dovecot thinks it's seeing. Aki > On 15 February 2018 at 18:11 David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello,

Hi! It seems you are running 2.2.33.2 =) Also, Feb 12 08:48:40 imap(user at example.com): Debug: Mailbox 'public/TestFolder' matches global ACL pattern 'public/TestFolder' Feb 12 08:48:40 imap(user at example.com): Debug: acl vfile: reading file /home/vmail/public/TestFolder/dovecot-acl Feb 12 08:48:40 imap(user at example.com): Debug: acl vfile: reading file

Hi. I''ve got here the following configuration: (turn on fixed pitch font to be able to see the scheme in a more accurately way) Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.0.0/24) (192.168.0.229) NAT Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET (192.168.1.0/24) (192.168.1.229) NAT [if doesn''t really

I am the sysadmin in an office with an overabundance of Win95 machines and a few NT 4.0 workstations. All installs went relatively easy for logon scripts, wins, etc. I have run into a semi-serious problem with 2 of the 3 NT workstations. (All running the same service pack - 1). When trying to make a share from one of the 2 remaining workstations, I will recevie an error message saying that:

I have a problem I can not identify. Two firewalls with OpenBSD 2.8 sshd version OpenSSH_2.3.0 I do a ssh root at 195.84.181.91 -v SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090581f). debug: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config debug: ssh_connect: getuid 0 geteuid 0 anon 0 debug: Connecting to 195.84.181.91 [195.84.181.91] port 22. debug: Allocated

Hi, I've used Samba several years without any problems. Last week I added a new disk to my system, and Samba started to behave very strange. It's slow in terms of establish a connection and time to list directories. I've tried to resolve the problem without success. No other daemon has problems, both ftp and http works fine as well as internal communication. Below I've attached

Hi, I have Asterisk set up on Fedora with a single SIP trunk, with a few handsets configured. The Asterisk box has both public and private addressing, so "canreinvite=no" is set on both the SIP trunk and handset configurations so I can get around the nasty NAT issues. One odd behaviour I am seeing is certain destinations are resulting in different SIP codes being sent back to Asterisk,

Two simple build fixes for libldm. Well, the first isn't a build fix as such, but a code improvement. Rich.

Hi, I have problem with a windows application called RAmicro (Lawyer software). In a programm module I get an error message from the program, can not open file. The corresponding logfile is here: [1999/04/12 21:38:23, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(327) dos_ChDir to /samba/vol1/ramicro [1999/04/12 21:38:23, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(346) unix_convert called on file "\RA\ZVT\44Z"

Failure for me is always: SMB PACKET: SMBsesssetupX (REPLY) > SMB Command = 0x73 > Error class = 0x6D > Error code = 49152 (0xc000) > Flags1 = 0x80 > Flags2 = 0x3 > Tree ID = 0 (0x0) > Proc ID = 12056 (0x2f18) > UID = 29165 (0x71ed) > MID = 3 (0x3) > Word Count = 0 (0x0) > NTError =

The attached patch adds an option (off by default to preserve current behavior) to set a timeout on the select() statement that waits for input in clientloop.c. This fixes a timeout issue for me (explained below) and probably also fixes the timeouts mentioned in last month's thread "Idle time out". The patch is also available by http from:

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:38:50AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > > In case you don't want to do it I can send the patch for the Xen > > variants. > > I might've opened a whole new can of worms here. I'm not sure we > can/want to fix the entire fallout this release :/ > > Let me