similar to: nobody nobody

NT 4.0 workstation users are complaining that all of their drive letters are getting used up by what appears to be a rampant network-drive mapping situation. For example, normally I have three shares network-mapped. Lately, ceetain people are complaining that one of their shares get's remapped a number of times to take up all the drive letters (except drive letter Z). So suddenly they

I have a Samba 1.9.18p8 server running fine on a particular network: >From smb.conf: interfaces = 138.120.247.0/24 ..and all works well with PC's on that network accessing the Samba server. Now for the tricky part. I want to move all of my computers to a new Class C network: 192.168.164.0 I have the router setup with DNS working, etc. I migrated one machine over to that network.

Unknown recipient ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 1:02 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2158 > SAMBA Digest 2158 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) msaccess and samba prob solved -

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Sanborn, Ed.vcf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 453 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20000531/c022b23d/SanbornEd.obj

Hi, I'm debating purchasing a NetAppliance fileserver that does native CIFS. Below is a URL to a NetAppliance authored paper regarding performance. One of the sections compares NFS to CIFS and talks about Samba. Can anyone dispute any of this? Is there any reason besides price that I should stick with Samba? -Ed Ed Sanborn (978) 691-6496 Northchurch

Hi Can somebody help me concerning this problm with samba. I am using samba 2.0.7 to link clearcase DB files on server UNIX with NT clearcase clients. We have upgraded clients from winNT4.0 to win2000 . Now we have many trouble like : PC stuck performance very slow file not found ( it exists!) etc... I saw in the samba log file of users the message as follow: cbc0794634 (137.x.x.x) connect to

I've spent some time updating, upgrading and generally consolidating an old Samba AD. I've managed to remove a very old unsupported (4.2) Samba AD DC following migration to a couple of new DC's - that seems to have worked out OK. Workstation logons and GPO's working fine. I'm now left with one problem after joining a new Samba (4.5.12) member server to the domain for file

Many thanks Rowland. Yes, I don't understand idmaps, but I _think_ I'm getting it. I have added the gid of 60002 for Domain Admins and undertaken some 'chgrp' tasks. I've now got a domain member with shares that presents the correct ownership. All looks good. I'm still slightly confused why I have two ranges within my member smb.conf: idmap config * : backend = tdb

All, I've recently upgraded my Samba server from 2.2.8 to 3.0.1. I also changed the security option to "security=Domain" and added it to the AD domain. The issue that I am having is that some users cannot access a share that is accessible to group members only, even though they are in the group. It appears that certain users on certain machines have a hard time mapping the

Hi Jerry et al, I recently installed the 3.0.1 release, since then I can not install any drivers as admin user :-( I'm running on Solaris 9 with ads (mybe I missed anything): [2003/12/18 13:56:58, 0] smbd/service.c:set_admin_user(321) lp logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2003/12/18 13:57:27, 0] smbd/connection.c:register_message_flags(220) register_message_flags: tdb_fetch

On 8/29/2016 3:59 PM, Pat Haley wrote: > We are running a cluster under CentOS 6.6. We recently attached a new > NAS device, running CentOS 6.8 and rsync'd our user file system to > it. We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody > as the group). We copied over the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files > from our front-end server to our NAS server. If we

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:59:31PM -0400, Pat Haley wrote: > ... We > noticed that all the files were owned by nobody (with nobody as the group). If its NFSv4, then its most likely a problem with your idmapper. Make sure that the rpc.idmapd is running on your client, and that your server has appropriate ID mapping enabled. If its NFSv4, are you using sec=krb5*? -- Jonathan Billings

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:59:31 -0400 Pat Haley wrote: > We noticed that all the files were owned by nobody Here are my notes for dealing with this issue: If all users come up as nobody on a nfs mount: Add nfs server name to the Domain = line in /etc/idmapd.conf on both the server and the clients, i.e. Domain = nameof.server /sbin/service rpcidmapd restart /sbin/service nfslock restart

On 4/3/19 2:17 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Content of idmapd.conf: As long as idmapd is *running* it typically doesn't need to be configured specifically. > Now one more question.? The imap daemon is a mail server.? How is it > that I need a mail server running to make LDAP and NFS work?? Doesn't > seem to make sense to me. idmapd is not imapd.? idmapd (aka

Hey Y'all, For the last week or more I've been trying to get NFS and OpenLDAP to play nice with each other. I've pretty much worn the Google machine out trying to find a solution. I've found several that said "Solved" but none of those solutions solved my nobody:nobody problem. In the past I've used NFS in conjunction with NIS to share home directories from my

still trying to solve my domain-problems (from time to time I get 'domain controller cant be found' on a special sambaserver 2.2.3a) Why does samba complain about wrong password for user nobody ? I actually found "nobody" in smbpasswd, but I'm not sure if I put it in there and dont understand why nobody needs to be samba-user. imho nobody is the unix-account under which

I am unable to setup printers on my samba system any long after I updated to the latest Solaris 10 Patch cluster. What I get in my log files all the time is: [2007/03/07 11:58:19, 2, effective(60001, 60001), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(263) find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found: _spoolss_writeprinter: Invalid handle (OTHER:11687:16175)

Greetings, Perhaps someone can offer some advice on how to get this working. I will detail my process and whats been done. on the XP side of the house (client side) 1. XP_signorseal registry hack applied, value at 0 now. 2. following values set to disabled: domain member: Digitally encrypt secure channel data (always) domain member: Digitally encrypt secure channel (when possible) domain member:

On 4/3/19 5:29 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 4/3/19 2:17 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> >> Content of idmapd.conf: > > > As long as idmapd is *running* it typically doesn't need to be > configured specifically. > > >> Now one more question.? The imap daemon is a mail server.? How is it >> that I need a mail server running to make LDAP and NFS

Hi R folks, I am using R version 2.2.1 for Unix. I am exploring the rpart function, in particular the rpart.control parameter. I have tried using different values for xval (0, 1, 10, 20) leaving other parameters constant but I receive the same tree after each run. Is the10 fold cross-validation default still running every time? I would expect the trees to change at least a little when I