similar to: Multi-homed interface name resolution

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Multi-homed interface name resolution"

1998 Oct 13
0
Bizarre multi-homed name resolution with nmbd?
Hi, I connected a multi-homed Win95 machine (carrot, see below) to two networks (ankh-net and morpork-net) which a multi-homed Linux machine running Samba 1.9.18p10 (or whatever the latest <2 is) was also connected to (vimes) and wanted to see which of the two interfaces Win95 would pick... --------------------------------- ankh-net 134.225.241.0/24 | |
1999 May 21
2
Suggestion for new 'dns proxy' feature?
Hi, Am I right I thinking that if I turn on 'dns proxy', I can do '\\smb.x.org' (if it fits into 15) letters? I'd like to use 'dns proxy' but only for local addresses in my domain. Would it be possible to do add a 'dns proxy local only = yes' or something (new option) which won't use DNS to resolve names which have a '.' in? (Alternatively, if
1998 Dec 17
0
SAMBA digest 1912 - browsing accross subnets
> From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> > To: "Samba Mailing List (E-mail)" <samba@samba.org> > Subject: Repost: Browsing across subnets (again) > > Hi All, > > this is probably a common problem and FAQ but I can't the solution. > > I've got two subnets, 10.1.1.0/255.255.0.0 at Leeds and > 10.2.0.0/255.255.0.0 at
1998 Jun 23
1
Browse list problem sorted
Hi, I posted a couple of times about a problem I was having with browsing, where smbclient (and other clients) showed nothing in the browse list, but wins.dat and browse.dat showed a list and the log showed the server becoming the domain and local master browser. Well, the problem turned out to be permissions on the .../samba/var and .../samba/var/locks directories; not allowing the
1998 May 05
0
WINS-only server? nmbd?
Hi All, I'm setting up a central WINS server on campus here and would like to use a Samba machine to do this (we don't have enough 'stable' NT to do it with that, yet). I don't really want to run the whole of Samba on that particular machine (since there is no need [I don't need file/print serving] and to keep someone happy with regards security ;-). Can I just run
1998 May 11
0
Browsing broken in 1.9.18p5?
Hi all, I've just installed 1.9.18p5 (although I've just got the mail about 1.9.18p6, so I'll be putting that on now) and am having a problem with browsing... [samba@suau1] ~> smbclient -L suau1 Added interface ip=134.225.16.5 bcast=134.225.19.255 nmask=255.255.252.0 Server time is Mon May 11 15:24:39 1998 Timezone is UTC+1.0 Password: Domain=[UNSEEN] OS=[Unix]
1998 May 20
0
Wierd browse problem
Hi, I'm running 1.9.18p7 in two places (two separate networks): one on Solaris 2.5 and one on Linux 2.0.33 (RedHat 4.1). The latter works fine, browsing included, 'smbclient -L server' lists the machines and workgroups/domains. However, this is on a small (two subnet) network. However, the Solaris installation does not appear to be working properly (for browsing... everything
1998 Jul 03
1
Cross-subnet browsing with multiple domains/workgroups
Hi, I'm trying to set up browsing across subnets to provide an 'enterprise'-wide (sorry for the MS term ;-) browse list / Network Neighbourhood. I've read BROWSING.TXT, but I can't see how machines on different subnets in different domains/workgroups sync up (using Samba, anyway). On my local subnet, I've set up a clunky old Linux 386 (Samba 1.9.18p8) as the browse
1999 Jul 08
3
Browsing only works when in Samba workgroup
Hi, We have a central Samba server which works fine. It also supplies WINS services which work fine. It also builds a browse list which seems to work fine. However, when I open 'Entire Network' on my W95 desktop machine on another subnet, I only see the workgroups / hosts on my subnet. The 95 machine is pointing to the Samba server as a WINS server. If I change the workgroup of
1997 Nov 30
2
nmbd crashing as domain controller
Hi, We've been over this before many times, I think... it's about nmbd crashing in 1.9.17 (all patchlevels, AFAIK). Various suggestions have been suggested (cron jobs to kill off / restart nmbd every hour) but no fixes to nmbd itself (I think). Do the Samba team know of a fix (or could they do one; if they know what the problem is)? A new [fast] machine added to our network recently
1998 Jan 23
2
SAMBA digest 1565 - Netlogon problems
Hi, > I have samba 1.9.17p4 running on Solaris 2.5 > I do not have a NT machine on the net > What I need to do is beable to login to the NT Domain from W95 > machines. > What I get is "No Domain Server was able to validate your > password...". > If I just login and reconnect drives/printers I get a login to login > to the server and I mount drives/printers
1998 Oct 20
3
SAMBA 1.9.18p10 problem
I have been using Samba 1.9.18p8 in a Solaris 2.6 machine for months but suddenly this week there is a problem. Nothing's changed. I have some persistent connection of my NTSP3 client to the samba share. When I login as usual, it fails to mount the drive. It either prompt for password but whatever password the samba rejects, or give a "Access is Denied" when you try to access the
1998 Oct 18
2
Changing "Shutdown" to "Log off" in Win95?
The Samba set up we're using to support 25 or so Win 95 clients is working well, but my users are usually not up to complicated tasks. Has anyone found a way to get logging out down to a single action (like, Start/Logout), instead of Start/Shutdown/Close all programs and log in as another user/Yes? I'm tired of explaining this already! :) Daryl Daryl Biberdorf darylb@superserve.com
1998 Sep 30
0
WINS multi-homed server resolution
I have a server here with 4 network interfaces (DEC Unix). All the Win95 clients are on the same 4 subnets as these 4 interfaces. One thing I noticed the other day is that the majority of the clients do not connect to the server's interface on the same subnet as the client. This is making unecessary use of our router. I'm wondering how I can force the clients to connect to the local
2020 May 18
1
Best practice multi-homed AD DC
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:44 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 17/05/2020 23:10, Michael Jones wrote: > > Why? > Amongst others, you may get: > > Slow / Failed logins > Replication issues > Group policy access issues > login script issues > > A multi-homed DC (for whatever reason) is a bad idea. > > Rowland > I
2006 May 02
1
[LLVMdev] Re: Patches and some potential bugs
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Domagoj Babic wrote: > These should add xIDs for several passes. Please let me know if there're > any problems with the code. I'm a very novice C++ and LLVM programmer, > so please bear with me. The patches look great, applied: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060501/034450.html
2020 May 18
1
Best practice multi-homed AD DC
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Michael Jones via samba > Verzonden: maandag 18 mei 2020 11:34 > Aan: Rowland penny > CC: sambalist > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Best practice multi-homed AD DC > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:44 AM Rowland penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >
2009 Oct 20
1
[Bug 616] New: Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 Summary: Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment. Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: iptables
2020 May 17
2
Best practice multi-homed AD DC
Dear all, as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. My current plan is to have one NIC for Samba services and a second one dedicated to management functions (e.g. SSH) on a separate network restricted to admin users. In a testbed scenario I already discovered that once both adapters exist, samba seems to
2008 Oct 14
1
GSSAPI Key Exchange on multi-homed host
>From a security standpoint, if the default keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab) contains only ONE principal, does it matter if GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck is set to "yes" or "no"? My company uses an internally built OpenSSH package that includes the GSSAPI Key Exchange patch. Because we have 1000s of hosts, we need to use a "standard" sshd_config file that works for the