similar to: Problems with MS Word 97 and Samba 1.9.18p10

OK, med 19:00 sv tid /Lennart At 13:05 1998-11-07 +1100, you wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1867 > >For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: nis homedir troubles > by Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com> > 2) calling all Samba vendors! > by Andrew Tridgell

Hello all, We're having some odd issues with samba and MS Word (And presumable the rest of the office suite, but I haven't checked) running on NT 4.0 sp3. MS Word doesn't seem to obey the umask settings: create mask = 0775 directory mask = 0775 When a new word document is created, it is given -rwxrw-r-instead of the -rwxrwxr-x I'm expecting. I'm not sure whats happening

There was an interruption in mail service and your memo was not sent. Please re-send your message. Thank-you -----Original Message----- From: samba@samba.anu.edu.au <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> To: Multiple recipients of list <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 1:24 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 1861 > SAMBA Digest 1861 > >For information on unsubscribing

Hello all, I poked around the archives on this with out much success. Here's the issue: A user is in "explorer" on an NT 4.0 sp3 machine. The User right clicks on a file and says "copy". Then in the same explorer window ( I don't think it matters, but that's how we're doing it in the example) they select the samba share, find the correct directory and

We are having a problem with Microsoft visual C++ compiling source code maintained on a samba server. Occasionaly the compiler reports that it cant open the file vc50.pch. The samba server is running on a freebsd box. Taking a look at the log files it looks like when the operation fails the server is processing the command open (vc50.pch for exclusive use write setattrE write open (vc50.pch

Richard Whiffen <whiffen@ici.org> wrote: > We're having some odd issues with samba and MS Word (And presumable the > rest of the office suite, but I haven't checked) running on NT 4.0 sp3. > > MS Word doesn't seem to obey the umask settings: > create mask = 0775 > directory mask = 0775 We've had that prblem here: many pc apps rename the file to be

Hi everyone, We use samba 2.0.4 and are very glad of it. However, recently I had to add a backup facility on our network, so we plan to purchase Arcserve IT for NT, in order to backup our servers. We are using mainly 3 Linux servers and 1 NT server, which runs the backup service. However, as Itried to add a simple share on the file server to enable backup, later I encounter problems with

[2002/09/19 12:02:27, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) latitude (172.16.0.6) connect to service pagepro6 as user samba (uid=1006, gid=1) (pid 4857) [2002/09/19 12:02:27, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(582) samba opened file SAMBA.mZaiFj read=No write=Yes (numopen=1) [2002/09/19 12:02:27, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2387) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.

Sorry that I will ask a kind of a vague question, but I don't really know how to proceed at the moment: Some of our Samba (1.9.18p10) users experience the following problem: they map a drive to a Samba share (pointing into AFS, if that matters) and see all files/dirs correctly after the password dialog. 'Some time' later (for one user usually about one hour) they try to use the drive

Hi there ! I just upgraded (last friday night) our main Samba host to Samba 2.0.0 from version 1.9.18p10. This host provides access to our own file based database system. The number of Samba clients is around 60 (nearly all NT4.0's and few NT3.51's). The Samba 2.0.0 host runs 'uname -a': HP-UX vertex A.09.05 A 9000/720 65914162 two-user license After the upgrade change I've

Reading : http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_3.6_Features_added/changed it seems there are options not to check having consistant SIDs. Otherwise, I used the solution with : net setlocalsid and it worked for me. Jacky ------------------------------------------- Here, the details of what I did : BEFORE : j-carimalo at j-carimalo-desktop:~$ smbclient //172.18.220.10/test -U j-carimalo Enter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I see some strange errors on a samba-3.0.2a PDC and fileserver running under Linux. Every now and then users are not able to access some random file. Windows tells the user that the "file is already opened" or some similar error message (it's an error message in german) The files are varying, I see all kinds of filenames where

Hi all, I'm having a problem with share modes (at least I think it's share modes) on my samba server. The problems only seem to have manifested themselves since I updated to samba 2.0.0. This has coincided with an upgrade to our system, so it is conceivable that the problem may be with that, but I think it more likely that it is to do with samba (since errors are reported in the log

I just thought that I would put this out there and see if anyone else sees this problem with Samba 1.9.18p4 (under Solaris 2.6). It appears that after some reboots of Solaris, Samba printing is partly dead. What I see in the logs are below, and what happens is that the file to be printed is spooled to /var/spool/samba, like always, but when the lpr command is issued it croaks. I've been

Using Samba 1.9.18p10 I have found a difference between Win95 and WinNT: opening 'Lotus Freelance' files from Win95 is really slow (about 17 kB/s only) vs fast (~hundreds of kB/s) from WinNT. Looking into the log (with debug level=4) I see using Win95: switch message SMBopenX (pid 33994) Skipping become_user - already user unix_clean_name [./PRIVATE/Goyal_Sep98.PRZ] Got dir cache hit on

Hi! After more work on the oplock_break problem, I've found the following in my tcpdump-smb logging. It seems that when ost5 (pid=26339 in the logs that follow) requests access to the oplocked file comm.inf from ost6 (pid=5872) the oplock_break failes (this is NOT isolated to any one or two systems on our network, just using these two as an example, and the server reports no dropped packets

Hi all! I've got an OS X Server (10.3.7) running the built-in version of Samba (3 something). I've got one sharepoint set up ("Apps") with 2 DOS applications in it. One is an old DOS version of Q&A (4, if it really matters). The other is a custom application that is text based. (.bat files, for the most part. A couple of complied pieces done in Turbo Basic.) All

We have a customer system running Slackware Linux (kernel 2.4.25) and Samba. The customer was running Samba 2.2.8 but we recently upgraded them to Samba 3.0.13. The customer has a FileMaker database on a public share. Before the upgrade, the customer was able to have multiple concurrent access to the database. After the upgrade, only the first user to access the database was successful.

Ok, I think I'm making progress. It turns out that the share is working fine for two win95 machines, but not the one win98 machine in the office. The win98 machine can edit/save an existing file, but not save as a new name, or copy files to the server. When this fails, there is a delay, then they get a message saying the resource is no longer available. I feel like this might be a

hello there ! I have one problem. We have a catalogue on a CD which is being used frequently so it's copied on a Novell network. But now we have to move it on a Samba box. But when two (or more) users try to run it, the second user (and all the rest) gets a message that the program couldn't access one file. The first user runs it perfectly. Here is a snippet from a log file: =cut=