similar to: NT & Samba

samba@samba.org schrieb: > SAMBA Digest 1929 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) samba-2.0.0beta4 > by xuwenwei@163.net > 2) Re: SAMBA digest 1924 > by Rudolf Spreckels <Rudolf.Spreckels@mh-media.de> > 3) Problems connecting over

All, Is there any way of telling which machine is doing what job? i.e. Domain Controller, local master, wins server etc. I have two machines and two workgroups but they both appear on the same workgroup. I think it is something to do with which machine is doing what. I think machine1 is acting as Domain Controller & Master Browser for workgroup1 and Machine2 is loosing all the browse

Hello I am currenly trying to setup Citel Link with Asterisk. So far i don't have any luck in able to assign IP address to Citel Link channel but still thought not a bad idea and get some one's view about Citel channel bank. Please let me know your experience while setting up Citel and Asterisk. I will appreciate if you tell me the way to talk to Citel Link using Hyper Terminal. Thanks

Hi all, Is using a Citel gateway with Asterisk a good solution for reusing of the old Nortel digital phones? Would love to get some input from actual users. Any/all opinions welcome. robert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070510/bc5fc18f/attachment.htm

I use res_snmp.so with asterisk do you provide mib --- David Yat Sin <davidy@sangoma.com> a ?crit : > Hi Harry, > The Sangoma Card when used for TDM Voice will work > under zaptel, so you > would need to perform the SNMP through Asterisk. > > Regards, > David Yat Sin > Sangoma Technologies > (905) 474 1990 x119 > (800) 388 2475 x199 > MSN:

Hi. I wanted to set diskless win95 but I read the list archives and I decided not to do it diskless. So I tried diskless windows but I got a problem. I do this. 1.- I did booting images with bootware proms. 2.- I managed to install DOS clients from microsoft. That was painfull because the one I downloaded from MS didn't connected to my samba server. I used a dos clients that creates a NT

cirrus_drv.h and cirrus_ttm.c are unused since commit ab3e023b1b4c ("drm/cirrus: rewrite and modernize driver"), apparently I ran "rm" instead of "git rm" on them so they are still in present the tree. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_drv.h | 250 --------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_ttm.c |

cirrus_drv.h and cirrus_ttm.c are unused since commit ab3e023b1b4c ("drm/cirrus: rewrite and modernize driver"), apparently I ran "rm" instead of "git rm" on them so they are still in present the tree. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_drv.h | 250 --------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_ttm.c |

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:23 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > > Time to kill some bad sample code people are copying from ;) > > This is a complete rewrite of the cirrus driver. The cirrus_mode_set() > function is pretty much the only function which is carried over largely > unmodified. Everything else is upside down. > > It is a single monster patch.

Time to kill some bad sample code people are copying from ;) This is a complete rewrite of the cirrus driver. The cirrus_mode_set() function is pretty much the only function which is carried over largely unmodified. Everything else is upside down. It is a single monster patch. But given that it does some pretty fundamental changes to the drivers workflow and also reduces the code size by

Does anyone know of a way to make an originate request coming over the management interface (e.g. AstTapi click-to-dial) include the relevant Alert-Info SIP headers to enable the originating phone to auto-answer? I've tried setting up a custom context (see below), but the dial plan is only entered AFTER the originating call is answered, so the SIP header is added to the terminating call leg,

Time to kill some bad sample code people are copying from ;) This is a complete rewrite of the cirrus driver. The cirrus_mode_set() function is pretty much the only function which is carried over largely unmodified. Everything else is upside down. It is a single monster patch. But given that it does some pretty fundamental changes to the drivers workflow and also reduces the code size by

Hi all. I found the 'remote announce' option for smb.conf, but I'm not sure this is what I want to use. I think my circumstances are quite odd. I currently have 1.9.18 running on a sparc, serving my PC, on the same network, at work. My Linux box at home I use to dial into my machine. So the PPP interface has the same netwokr as the boxes at work. My Linux box also has 10mbs

I am observing the following behaviour with samba-2.2.12 (Yes, I know, it's old) and MS-Access XP on a Win2K box: The client opens a .mdb file and gets a level2 oplock. Then it opens the .mdb file again and loses the oplock (at least I assume it does: The server sends an SMBlockingX request to the client and waits for another SMBlockingX request from the client before sending the Reply to

Time to kill some bad sample code people are copying from ;) This is a complete rewrite of the cirrus driver. The cirrus_mode_set() function is pretty much the only function which is carried over largely unmodified. Everything else is upside down. It is a single monster patch. But given that it does some pretty fundamental changes to the drivers workflow and also reduces the code size by

Time to kill some bad sample code people are copying from ;) This is a complete rewrite of the cirrus driver. The cirrus_mode_set() function is pretty much the only function which is carried over largely unmodified. Everything else is upside down. It is a single monster patch. But given that it does some pretty fundamental changes to the drivers workflow and also reduces the code size by

On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:23:53 +0000 Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau at arm.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:21:53AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > +Akash with whom we've been discussing adding a 'REPEAT' mode to > > drm_gpuvm/panthor. > > > > On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 19:53:47 +0100 > > Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org> wrote: > >

Asterisk Users, Developers, Gurus, Etc., AstriCon Europe 2006 is only 20 days away! Sign up now to ensure a seat at the European Asterisk event of the year! Events will be held in Berlin (June 19 - 20), Paris (June 22 - 23) and London (June 26 - 27). Don't forget to hold the date for AstriCon 2006 USA in Dallas, October 24 - 27. REGISTER: http://www.astricon.net/ TUTORIALS: - Asterisk

On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:21:53AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > +Akash with whom we've been discussing adding a 'REPEAT' mode to > drm_gpuvm/panthor. > > On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 19:53:47 +0100 > Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org> wrote: > > > Hi Lina, > > > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 10:34:49PM +0900, Asahi Lina wrote: > > > Some

No users are left, kill it off! :D Conversion to the reservation api is next on the list, after that the functionality can be restored with rcu. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 25 +++------- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 6 -- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 16 +-----