similar to: ACSII vs BINARY transfers...

> On 11 May 2015, at 15:53 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/05/2015 9:35 AM, Tal Galili wrote: >> Hi Duncan, >> Thank you for the clarification. :) >> >> I ended up removing these files from being scanned in the updated version of installr. I would rather focus on supporting an MD5 scan that is based on what is listed in MD5

Hi, I''ve started learning about EventMachine right now and have some basic doubts. Hope you could clarify them. I''m developing a SIP server. For now I''ve started it from scratch but I expect to migrate it to EventMachine. SIP is a very complex protocol. For example: if I use a SIP proxy in front of my server then all the data will arrive to my server using the same TCP

Hi I have a problem accessing NT boxes which have a service (host) name which is purely numeric, smbclient insists on treating it as an ip number. For example:- /opt/samba/bin/smbclient \\\\06842\\BACKUP xxxxx -U xxxxx returns :- Connecting to 0.0.14.34 at port 139 Connection to 06842 failed I am using HPUX 10.2 and samba version 2.0.4b. Surely it should be possible to connect to NT

Morning... I'm having a problem that I'm finding to be quite disconcerting, but fear it might just be a misunderstanding on my part. I have Samba 1.9.18p8 installed on one of my Solaris 2.6 machine, and, for some reason, if I change my password on the Solaris machine, I can still map my drive without it re-asking me for my passwd. For instance, I turn on my computer and connect to

Is it possible to have a share within a share, or to force group on directories within a share? What I am trying to do is set up departmental shares, but find that having them all in the root list of shares looks messy (too many shares :P ) What would be preferable, would be to have a [departments] share, then put a share for each department within that share. Just using directories within

> The way I deal with this is to use SetGID. The way this works is that you set the setgid bit on a directory, and any file or directory created under it inherits it's group, rather than the primary group of the process creating it. Directories created under this directory also inherit the SetGID bit. This means that if you have one share, with all the top level directories in it.

Under Solaris 7/sparc, I get: Compiling smbd/connection.c smbd/connection.c:381: conflicting types for `utmp_yield' smbd/connection.c:30: previous declaration of `utmp_yield' 381 has 'int pid', while 30 has 'pid_t pid' ... I changed 381 to reflect 30 and she continues on its way ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems

git://git.zytor.com/users/genec/syslinux.git Branch handoff-mbr-for-hpa This is a piece of code that can be used in place of a MBR or VBR/PBR (master boot record; volume/partition) in order to examine the data handed to the respective boot code. AX, SS, and SP are destroyed before examining anything. I set an internal restriction that limits it to 420 bytes such that it could be used with a

Hi. I've made a strange observation. When having Dovecot (at least) with maildir and moving (via IMAP) mail received by some client (Evolution 3.4) into it the following happens: Regardless of whether the mail was originally(!) set with CRLF or LF (i.e. when I use netcat to submit the plain SMTP to the relaying MTA). When the client (Evolution) had received the mail via POP3 before moving

I installed Fixcrlf.exe from the Samba site. I tried it out on my NT 4.0 station, but it doesn't seem to accomplish anything. Specifically: - I bring up a file in Notepad - the text is one long line with black squares at the end of records, indicating that there are LF's but not CRLF's. - I drag the file icon from Explorer on to the FixCRLF icon and am rewarded with an

There are three fonts in c:\windows\fonts: stxingkai.ttf simsun.ttf and simyou.ttf If an application does not specify a font, then stxingkai.ttf is loaded in it to show the text. If I remove the stxingkai.ttf from c:\windows\fonts then it use simyou.ttf to show text. If I remove simyou.ttf again then it use simsun.ttf. But you know, I hope the simsun.ttf is the first choice. Then the first

Hi @all... Following configuration i used before samba 3: character set = ISO8859-1 codepage = CP850 I could read an write files with umlauts from my Win2k Client. Doing an ls at the linux console showed a ? (question mark) instead the umlaut, but using mc (Midnight Commander) shows the right char. I was quite happy with this setup. Now, with samba 3.0.0final-1 (from Debian/sarge), I tried

One of the recent 1.0 commits relating to CRLF handling (maybe 2006-06-24) has changed the behaviour of APPEND when using mbox files with ordinary plain text emails. When a client stores a new message using an APPEND command (eg. saving a draft or copy of a sent message), it uses CRLF consistently as a line-ending throughout the literal data block over the wire - both for the header and the

Hello everyone, I'm using the very good imaptest [0] tool to test my little imap server implementation. I've tried to use the dovecot-crlf [1] file, but it looks like there are some major issues : $ grep -n "In-Reply-To.*;" tests/data/dovecot-crlf 479:In-Reply-To: <20020806175441.GA7148 at linux.taugt.net>; from rueckert at informatik.uni-rostock.de on Tue, Aug 06, 2002

On 28/08/2020 01:11, Alec Moskvin wrote: > Hello, > > When connecting to Exim 4.94, dovecot submission logs this warning: > > dovecot[25235]: submission(alec)<25347><QNydV8+t+oMKAgAF>: Warning: smtp-client: conn localhost:25 ([::1]:25) [1]: Received invalid EHLO response line: Unexpected character in EHLO keyword > > Looks like it doesn't like the underscore

As a followup to my own email... We did some testing here today with connecting to the share from an NT box, where we connect to \\relay\marc as marc when log'd in as a seperate user...NT refuses to allow it. Is there a bug with the server that, using smbclient from Linux, allows you to connect to any share without a password? Can someone test this and see if its a local problem or not?

lvqcl wrote: > lvqcl wrote: > > > The patch does the following: > > Does the patch work for linux git? Windows git cannot apply a patch > that was created itself. It looks like that patch was created with the 'git diff' command and hence cannot be applied using the 'git am' command. It does however apply using the patch command. > (It writes LF in

> On 27 Mar 2015, at 10:19, Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > we are migrating from Cyrus 2.3.7 to Dovecot 2.2.13. We have ~7000 maildirs with ~500GB. Our goal is to do the migration without users have notice and with the shortest service downtime. The users use IMAP (with shared folders and ACL), POP3 and sieve filters. > > As a first

Hi everybody! I hope that you are not already "pissed off" of all the crlf/lf conversion discussion between dos and unix ;-) Concerning that topic I have a question / suggestion: This is what we have: We are using a Win NT 4.0 Server with Win95 clients. Additionally we have a Sun (Solaris 2.5) running in the same network. To access the Sun in character mode we use a terminal

Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following: http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the problems revolve around Linux's IP stack... Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set... Marc G. Fournier