Hi everybody! I hope that you are not already "pissed off" of all the crlf/lf conversion discussion between dos and unix ;-) Concerning that topic I have a question / suggestion: This is what we have: We are using a Win NT 4.0 Server with Win95 clients. Additionally we have a Sun (Solaris 2.5) running in the same network. To access the Sun in character mode we use a terminal emulation (Reflection). We do not access the Sun from the clients in GUI mode. This is what we do: We are supporting a software with a huge amount of single files (more than 7000 (7K) files!) running/laying on the UNIX machine. When we receive a patch we have to have to compare the patched file with the one on our Sun and then add the patched lines into it. Therefore we ftp the files to the Win clients and then use a windows tool (vdifmrg) to compare and patch the files. This tool creates a new file with the merged output. After all this we ftp those files back to the Sun. We thought that when using Samba we get rid of the "ftp steps" and simply access those files directly on the Unix machine. This works except of the generation of the output file because this is saved in DOS-format on the Unix file system. So we would have to convert those generated files manually to make them work. If we have to do this we prefer to use the former way. This is what we would like to have: Well, it is very simple to guess what we want to have: a CRLF/LF conversion ;-) and I know of all your thoughts and concerns about this. Because I read a lot of articles from the Samba web site especially the CRLF-LF-Conversions.txt file. But for us, it would be great to have a PERMANENT file conversion because we only "access" ASCII files. If we have to transfer binaries we will use the good old ftp protocol. What do you think about this? Is there a light at the end of the tunnel for us? Is it possible to implement this conversion into Samba or does anybody has another, perhaps better, solution for us? Best regards, Stefan Kappey TRW ISCS GmbH GERMANY
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:38:48 +1100, hai scritto:>What do you think about this? Is there a light at the end of the tunnel for us? >Is it possible to implement this conversion into Samba or does anybody has >another, perhaps better, solution for us?There are windows editors (I use TextPad) which can save in dos/unix/mac formats, and default to save files in the format they already are. See if your win prog (or newer versions of it) can do the same. Otherwise you can do a script that periodically checks the files and if they are in dos format converts them to unix. This would be a 2 steps solution. -- giulioo@pobox.com
On 0, stefan_kappey@trw-iscs.com wrote:> Hi everybody! > > I hope that you are not already "pissed off" of all the crlf/lf conversion > discussion between dos and unix ;-) > > < SNIP > > > What do you think about this? Is there a light at the end of the tunnel for us? > Is it possible to implement this conversion into Samba or does anybody has > another, perhaps better, solution for us? >Samba does not touch the contents of the files, which is good. Handling text files and html files is something, that we as users should take care about. One solution that was suggested to me was use freeware or shareware products on Microsoft platform. I downloaded GWD Text editor and use it in the place of Notepad. It converts text files from different platforms appropriately. You can choose wordpad, but IMHO it is a bit heavier than GWD. GWD is lightweight and does the job well. There is another circumlocuted way of converting the files, using programs like dos2unix and unix2dos. That is not worth it. You are better off using some good text editors on Microsoft platforms. Hope that helps. Subba Rao subb3@attglobal.net http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/ => Time is relative. Here is a new way to look at time. <http://www.smcinnovations.com
Stefan Kappey wrote: | We are supporting a software with a huge amount of single files | (more than 7000 (7K) files!) running/laying on the UNIX machine. | When we receive a patch we have to have to compare the patched | file with the one on our Sun and then add the patched lines into | it. Therefore we ftp the files to the Win clients and then use | a windows tool (vdifmrg) to compare and patch the files. This | tool creates a new file with the merged output. After all this | we ftp those files back to the Sun. Well, ther'es at least two ways to do this: 1) vdiffmrg on the Sun (the filemerge tool does just that) 2) change the whole share via the vfs written by Tim Potter (Tim.Potter@anu.edu.au) --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people 185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain Willowdale, Ontario | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb@canada.sun.com
Apparently Analagous Threads
- RE: CRLF << -- >> LF
- Guidelines when to use LF vs CRLF ("\n" vs. "\r\n") on Windows for new lines (line endings)?
- [PATCH] contrib/cygwin/ssh-host-config: Fix a CRLF/LF issue
- should dovecot store maildir files with CRLF or LF?
- Guidelines when to use LF vs CRLF ("\n" vs. "\r\n") on Windows for new lines (line endings)?