similar to: Slow writes continued

My Samba-shared printers (v2.0.3) printers worked great until I updated several software packages last weekend. These printers are networked and can still be used by running lpr from the command line of my Linux (RedHat v5.2, kernel 2.2.5) server. Print jobs sent from the client machines (OS/2 and Win98) are not printed. A job sent from a client machine is apparently just lost. Nothing

Back to this problem Here a proof of it: 1. smbd version 3.0.11 started yaberge2@sda6 ==> p smbd root 13820 20662 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf root 20662 1 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf yaberge2@sda6 ==> /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus Samba version 3.0.11

Hi All, When I copied one file from NT4.0 to Linux through samba with 'copy' command in NT4.0, the file was always corrupted. Size of the file copied into Linux was always about 4G. If I copied it through Windows Explorer, it was OK. It seems samba cannot process the "Write Raw" request sent by 'copy' command correctly when file size is larger than 4G bytes. Thanks

Dear all, I have made patch for samba-2.0.7/source/smbd/conn.c This will, instead of using by-directional link, use array for managing connections. # The patch does seems to work on my RHL6.1Ja(fixed) version of # Linux machine. I don't know about other OS/Architecture. This should work better then original because: 1) The original code used bitmap.c for looking empty area. But using

I would like to be able to exert certain types of control over the plotting of dendrograms (representing hierarchical clusterings) that I think is best achieved by modifying the dendrogram object prior to plotting. I am using the "dendrogram" class and associated methods. Define the cluster number of each cluster formed as the corresponding row of the merge object. So, if you are

Using Samba 1.9.18p10 I have found a difference between Win95 and WinNT: opening 'Lotus Freelance' files from Win95 is really slow (about 17 kB/s only) vs fast (~hundreds of kB/s) from WinNT. Looking into the log (with debug level=4) I see using Win95: switch message SMBopenX (pid 33994) Skipping become_user - already user unix_clean_name [./PRIVATE/Goyal_Sep98.PRZ] Got dir cache hit on

Dear Sirs ! I succesfully setup samba 1.9.18p3 to work with domain logons of win95. Works perfectly. Also I tryed to compile samba with -DNTDOMAIN and configure NT to with domain logons. If samba compiled with-NTDOMAIN, NT can't work with samba in any way - w/ domain logons and w/o. Below log file that created by samba, when I tryed to setup NT to domain logon to samba. Note: I uses unix

Hi all: I am experiencing a problem where WinNT and Samba are dropping connections during file transfers. I have the following smb.conf settings: keep alive = 30 dead time = 1440 socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_KEEPALIVE (although I tried IPTOS_NODELAY with no apparent benefit). The client is copying a large number of files up to the server, then there is a pause at a random file,

We are having a problem with Microsoft visual C++ compiling source code maintained on a samba server. Occasionaly the compiler reports that it cant open the file vc50.pch. The samba server is running on a freebsd box. Taking a look at the log files it looks like when the operation fails the server is processing the command open (vc50.pch for exclusive use write setattrE write open (vc50.pch

I''m trying this: firmware.should_receive(:execute).with("ATZ").once.ordered.and_return(AT_OK) firmware.should_receive(:execute).with("ATE0V1").once.ordered.and_return(AT_OK) firmware.should_receive(:execute).with("AT+CNUM").once.and_return(AT_OK) But rspec does not complain that "AT+CNUM" is never passed as argument. Bug? Or did I misinterpret the

This is surely in a FAQ somewhere, but I can't find it. Latest ver. of samba on RH Linux 5.0, encrypt. passwds. My Win95 clients were happy. Then I used poledit to turn off password caching and now they are not happy. The problem is that they can't connect to their home directories. Guest shares are fine, and other shares that require passwords are fine, but when you connect to your home

Could anyone tell me what I may be doing wrong here? I'm using samba-1.9.18p8 on a Linux 2.0.32 box, RedHat 5.0 install. I can descend into this share from a WinNT box just fine, but get the following error messages from a Win95 box. Thank you all in advance, -Jon Charette --------- Start log at debug level 4 ---------------------- 1998/07/08 13:20:22 Transaction 52 of length 47 switch

I think you're making it far too difficult. What I do is something like this: [outgoing] include => internal include => longdistance ;Always include internal first, as matches from the first include ;will be used first. This allows you to make sure your internal ;extensions don't go out your trunks. [longdistance] ignorepat => 9; include => default; already included from

Hi Folks, I'm new to the list, and am writing because of some trouble I am having. An old version of Samba is involved, and I am not sure that I can upgrade. I am trying to explore the issue further. I am currently using Samba 1.9.18p10 (I can hear the smack of 1,000 hands slapping foreheads now -- please read on). The problem is that the Samba server hangs when I copy a large file (~100

> -----Original Message----- > From: David Gomillion [mailto:dgomillion@eyecarenow.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:27 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: Match a Numer - then continue with, > dialplan > > > I think you're making it far too difficult. > > What I do is something like this: > > [outgoing]

Greetings! We've got a neat little problem running Samba 1.9.18p8 on Solaris x86 2.5.1 and AFS on a dual-processor Dell PowerEdge 2200 w/ 128M RAM. The machine has 11M of free real memory and 417M of free swap according to "top". Every once in a while (there goes one now...) an "smbd" process will attempt to consume all available processing time it can. We recompiled

I just thought that I would put this out there and see if anyone else sees this problem with Samba 1.9.18p4 (under Solaris 2.6). It appears that after some reboots of Solaris, Samba printing is partly dead. What I see in the logs are below, and what happens is that the file to be printed is spooled to /var/spool/samba, like always, but when the lpr command is issued it croaks. I've been

Hi - A client reported this morning that the "Save As" function in some tax planning software they use "didn't work with the new server" (Samba 1.9.17p2 on intel/linux v 2.0.30). All client machines are Win95 OSR2. Essentially, when you type a name in the save as dialog and press enter, a backslash is added to the end of the new filename (in the dialog, that is),

Sorry that I will ask a kind of a vague question, but I don't really know how to proceed at the moment: Some of our Samba (1.9.18p10) users experience the following problem: they map a drive to a Samba share (pointing into AFS, if that matters) and see all files/dirs correctly after the password dialog. 'Some time' later (for one user usually about one hour) they try to use the drive

Hi All, I've finally found solutions for my previous problems. But since this includes changes in the shared files, I'd like to discuss them here. 1. Driver restart problem. When I start the driver for the first time, everything is ok. But when I want to restart it, problems begin. The driver fails to read Report descriptor for the second time (libusb_open is used to open the device).