similar to: Connection problems?

Running Samba 1.9.16p11 on Sun Solaris 2.5.1, cannot browse the Sun shares from PC's. Also tried the lastest version of Samba with same results. Went back to p11 for other reasons. At first I thought it was something wrong with the lmhosts file. Any suggestions? Garrett Curtis gcurtis@sermatech-lehr.com

I have two problems running Samba on Solaris 2.51, Samba version 1.9.16p11. 1) When browsing the CADCAM group, which is where the Sun group is, the CADCAM name shows up on Explorer, but when I click on the group to browse the contents, the '+' disapears and the group apears to be empty. We can, however, map drives using \\sun01\sharname' directly. 2) When we dial into the network

I am having broswer problems. Currently running 1.9.16.p11 on Solaris 2.51. I see the workgroup, CADCAM, in Explorer on a pc. But, when browsing CADCAM, the '+' sign goes away and nothing shows up under the group. PC's can still map the shares ok. My smb.conf entry is: browseable = yes workgroup = CADCAM Do I need to put something in the lmhosts file? Thanks, Garrett Curtis

Giulio Orsero wrote: > I've used > oplocks = no > for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I > decided to give 2.0.7 a try. > [ snip ..] > > - the server is linux 2.2.14/samba2.0.7; it's not the server where I > used to made oplock_break tests. It's another one on another lan. It's > used almost exclusively to store

I've used oplocks = no for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I decided to give 2.0.7 a try. I still get "oplock break" errors as before, but this time I got a new error too: [2000/05/02 10:04:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(976) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file XXXXX/xxxxxx/mailbox.pst

CORRUPTED MESSAGE This is the Courier Mail Server 0.40 on mail. I received the following message for delivery to your address. Unfortunately, the sender's mail software did not properly format the following message according to Internet mail formatting protocols, and I can only deliver mail which has been properly formatted according to Internet standards. Instead of returning the

subscribe

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Delivery failed for the following recipients(s): jtai@altera.com The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block. Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious software from being sent to the recipient in question. The name(s) of the blocked file(s) follow:

Hello, I have a strange problem with Samba 2.04b and M$ Outlook97 on NT 4.0 SP4. I am using a SCO OpenServer 5.04 system as mailserver (POP3) and nameserver as well as Samba Server. For backup reasons I have installed Outlook in such a way that its own mail file (postfach.pst) is on the Samba share. If the NT box and Outlook are freshly started I can retrieve mails from the POP3 or send

On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:30:34 +0800 (CST) yang.yang29 at zte.com.cn wrote: > From: xu xin <xu.xin16 at zte.com.cn> > > This creates six drop reasons as follows, which will help users know the > specific reason why bridge drops the packets when forwarding. > > 1) SKB_DROP_REASON_BRIDGE_FWD_NO_BACKUP_PORT: failed to get a backup > port link when the destination port is

From: xu xin <xu.xin16 at zte.com.cn> This creates six drop reasons as follows, which will help users know the specific reason why bridge drops the packets when forwarding. 1) SKB_DROP_REASON_BRIDGE_FWD_NO_BACKUP_PORT: failed to get a backup port link when the destination port is down. 2) SKB_DROP_REASON_BRIDGE_FWD_SAME_PORT: destination port is the same with originating port when

Hi, In my env we have quite a number of old PC which are running windows95. I have installed the thunderbird and outlook97 with the right configuration to dovecot. Everytime I starts the mail client it shows the following, dovecot: Oct 09 10:56:45 Info: imap-login: Disconnected: rip=172.24.65.60, lip=172.24.66.24 only then it shows the login screen. After submit the password, it doesn't

Hi Guys, I've already posted this to the postfix mailing list and they made sure the error as the title suggest was generated by dovecot and not the other way around. I have an almost perfectly working multi domain mail server running dovecot+postfix+mysql+postfixadmin behind pfsense, when we transferred office, issues arose, suddenly users using email clients like thunderbird/outlook

Hello, ive tried to send letters to samba list few times and every time i get a mail back with an error "Message status - undeliverable" from Mailer-Daemon at mthelen7.ballarat.edu.au. The contents of the letter is following: The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following: Mdelves (User account is expired) So i'm sending this test message to make sure my letters

The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets there. I know this virtually for sure because I'm tailing /var/log/maillog and nothing new has been added for the past hour. I'm thinking eventually my ISP will send the message back to me

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:02:29 +0200, you wrote: >Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2015, 11:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura: >> The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of >> delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a >> valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets >> there. I know this virtually for sure

Hello Everybody. I have problem with samba (debian potato 2.2.17 with samba 2.2.2), when I'am using samba to share "normal" files - everything was ok. But I must still use Microsoft Mail (messaging system) to deliver local messages in my network. Last time, I move this server to samba (before was on NT 3.51 :-)), and I have problem: When some part of my clients open MS Outlook with

On 6/16/2015 10:44 AM, Steve Matzura wrote: > The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of > delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a > valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets > there. I know this virtually for sure because I'm tailing > /var/log/maillog and nothing new has been added for the past

Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2015, 11:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura: > The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of > delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a > valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets > there. I know this virtually for sure because I'm tailing > /var/log/maillog and nothing new has been

can you: $ telnet yourhost.com 25 (obviously replacing yourhost.com with whatever your domain/ip actually is) from the machine you are sending the mail from? If not make sure the service is running and make sure there isn't a firewall rule preventing this. On 06/16/15 10:44, Steve Matzura wrote: > The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of > delivering mail